You started this by stating rape is not possible in a marriage.
Yes, the criminal offense of "rape" never included any form of sex between two married people until the definition of rape was changed in the 1960s.
By extension, you must be okay with it when it does happen.
You probably believe that it is impossible for the "flying spaghetti monster" to appear above New York City and destroy the Empire State Building.
Should I assume that you must be okay with it when it does happen?
Or, should I be rational and assume that you would be very upset with it happening?
You are not speaking out against evil so you are supporting it.
I am speaking out against the evil that you are supporting.
Straight up yes or no: Is it okay for a husband to physically force his wife to have sex with him against her will?
I have repeatedly stated that it is not okay.
I have also repeatedly stated that criminalizing that act by redefining rape laws to include sex between a husband and his wife does greater harm to society than decriminalizing the act.
I also believe that criminalizing drug abuse is also more harmful than decriminalizing drug abuse.
I am not advocating for the decriminalization of rape committed by a man against someone who is not his spouse.
My arguments are not about the morality of the husband forcing his wife to have sex.
There are no moral arguments that can support that act.
My arguments are about the damage done to society by criminalizing the act.
Are you aware of all the things that happen in America when someone is charged with rape (even if never convicted)?
The accusation alone can destroy a man's life.
Just because of the accusation he will be forced to register as a sex offender for life, with all the restrictions in places to live, jobs he can hold, and ability to even visit his children.
Our current rape culture (created by feminists) makes him guilty even if proven innocent.