Is calling Beanieboy a . . .

Is calling Beanieboy a . . .


  • Total voters
    81

Caledvwlch

New member
Lighthouse said:
It wasn't an accusation. That was why I used that word, because I did not want to falsely accuse him. And he confronted it, and it is taken care of. Get over yourself.
No way dude, I am un-get-over-able. Better men have tried and failed. I, unfortunately am doomed to forever be under myself.
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
The Edge said:
Lighthouse, just curious....do you follow Bob Enyart?
To an extent. Why?

When I first came to TOL, I thought Bob was nothing more than a hateful bigot, and full of himself, and full of other things, as well. After getting to know him, and read his material, and seeing what the Bible actually says, I changed my attitude.

I came to TOL, made my first post, in August of 2003.
 

Caledvwlch

New member
Lighthouse said:
It wasn't an accusation. That was why I used that word, because I did not want to falsely accuse him. And he confronted it, and it is taken care of. Get over yourself.
And, if that's the case, then why did you say it in the first place?
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
Because somebody had said it about him before, and I thought it was because he had said it. But since I hadn't seen him say it, I didn't say it was a fact.
 

On Fire

New member
Dave, I have a short memory so forgive me....

You said that H is a behavioral anomally. Do you think it is a sin?
 

On Fire

New member
Lighthouse said:
Because somebody had said it about him before, and I thought it was because he had said it. But since I hadn't seen him say it, I didn't say it was a fact.
Come on, Lighthouse, "apparently" is not a disclaimer. Admit it and move on.
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
No, it wasn't a disclaimer. But I honestly wasn't sure if Dave had ever done that or not. And that was the only thing I could think of.
 

The Edge

BANNED
Banned
Lighthouse said:
To an extent. Why?

When I first came to TOL, I thought Bob was nothing more than a hateful bigot, and full of himself, and full of other things, as well. After getting to know him, and read his material, and seeing what the Bible actually says, I changed my attitude.

I came to TOL, made my first post, in August of 2003.
Because, I think that Bob Enyart is very smart, and has some good ideas, but I still think he's full of himself. I agree with a lot of what he says though. However, I have never seen any of his followers be humble or admit they are wrong or be willing to accept correction or deal with their own sin (I'm not saying this of you, don't get me wrong here). And that disturbs me.
 

Ecumenicist

New member
On Fire said:
Dave, I have a short memory so forgive me....

You said that H is a behavioral anomally. Do you think it is a sin?

I'm going to answer your question
honestly (for me), "I can't judge." I've said it many times, there are so
many OT laws, and Christ upheld some and dismissed
others as "ritual purity," and the only fair metric I've
found for determining which laws have teeth and which
apply more to ritual purity are dependent on whether a person is hurting
self or others.

In some cases, yes, homosexuality is very harmful to
self and others. In other cases, like committed
relationships that are loving and not destructive or
harmful in any way, no one is harmed.

Like I said, promiscuity is the enemy, it spreads disease,
destroys families. and diminishes human dignity.

Dave
 

On Fire

New member
Dave Miller said:
I'm going to answer your question
honestly (for me), "I can't judge." I've said it many times, there are so
many OT laws, and Christ upheld some and dismissed
others as "ritual purity," and the only fair metric I've
found for determining which laws have teeth and which
apply more to ritual purity are dependent on whether a person is hurting
self or others.

In some cases, yes, homosexuality is very harmful to
self and others. In other cases, like committed
relationships that are loving and not destructive or
harmful in any way, no one is harmed.

Like I said, promiscuity is the enemy, it spreads disease,
destroys families. and diminishes human dignity.

Dave

So the only things you are willing to call outright sins are those things that hurt self or others? But that implies that you are able to rightly "judge" what things are or are not harmful.

How much credence do you give to God's creation and what it seems to imply about relationships and sexuality?
 

SUTG

New member
Poll: Is calling Beanieboy a faggot a Christ-like thing to do?


That is a tough one. Since no-one agrees on whether christ existed, who he was, or what he was like, the phrase "christ-like" doesn't seem to have that much meaning.

To me, a more interesting question would be to ask how many of those calling Beanieboy names for tolerating homosexuals are Roman Catholic. In light of the recent happenings in the church, these people could use a lesson in consistency.
 

The Edge

BANNED
Banned
Dave Miller said:
I'm going to answer your question
honestly (for me), "I can't judge." I've said it many times, there are so
many OT laws, and Christ upheld some and dismissed
others as "ritual purity," and the only fair metric I've
found for determining which laws have teeth and which
apply more to ritual purity are dependent on whether a person is hurting
self or others.

In some cases, yes, homosexuality is very harmful to
self and others. In other cases, like committed
relationships that are loving and not destructive or
harmful in any way, no one is harmed.

Like I said, promiscuity is the enemy, it spreads disease,
destroys families. and diminishes human dignity.

Dave
Dave,

Romans chapter 1 clearly states in the NT that homosexuality is a sin. Plain and simple.
 

Ecumenicist

New member
On Fire said:
So the only things you are willing to call outright sins are those things that hurt self or others? But that implies that you are able to rightly "judge" what things are or are not harmful.

In a way, I agree with what you're saying here, I cannot judge, and that's
one reason why I say, again, I cannot judge, and not judging means not
saying its either sin or not sin.

However, on the other hand,
I know people in loving, committed homosexual relationships who do no harm
to themselves or others. They're just sweet people trying to get along in a
world that hates them, and they're told every day of the week that God hates
them as well.

Whe I apply the golden rule, and wonder how I would feel if our roles were
reversed, teh only reference I have is my relationship with my wife. If someone
told me they hated me and God hated me because of my committed relationship
with my wife, I would not be a happy camper, in fact I would reject whatever
god they tried to sell me based on those criteria.

Now, when you talk about a gay lifestyle which includes promiscuous
behavior, absolutely, sin, evil.

How much credence do you give to God's creation and what it seems to imply about relationships and sexuality?

Alot, and that's why I agree that its an anomolly.
 

Crow

New member
Dave Miller said:
In a way, I agree with what you're saying here, I cannot judge, and that's
one reason why I say, again, I cannot judge, and not judging means not
saying its either sin or not sin.

However, on the other hand,
I know people in loving, committed homosexual relationships who do no harm
to themselves or others. They're just sweet people trying to get along in a
world that hates them, and they're told every day of the week that God hates
them as well.

Whe I apply the golden rule, and wonder how I would feel if our roles were
reversed, teh only reference I have is my relationship with my wife. If someone
told me they hated me and God hated me because of my committed relationship
with my wife, I would not be a happy camper, in fact I would reject whatever
god they tried to sell me based on those criteria.

Now, when you talk about a gay lifestyle which includes promiscuous
behavior, absolutely, sin, evil.



Alot, and that's why I agree that its an anomolly.

Dave, how can you make the statement that a gay lifestyle which includes promiscuous behavior is sinful and evil if you cannot judge?
 

aikido7

BANNED
Banned
Dave, how can you make the statement that a gay lifestyle which includes promiscuous behavior is sinful and evil if you cannot judge?
Now you're getting the idea of what "sinful behavior" really IS. And, by the way, all of us humans have judging, evaluating minds. That's our sin. Jesus was aware of that.
 

Agape4Robin

Member
Homosexuality is sinful and "evil" because God says so. He's already made the judgement. Not me.

It's my responsibility to tell of the hope that I have in Christ, not damn someone to hell for their behavior.
 
Top