IRS Admits Targeting Conservative Groups; Apologizes
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
WoundedEgo
New member
Just to be clear, Ms. Lerner's decision to consider whether these groups were violating the tax code (which many are) did not come from the White House. This is another bogus "Obama scandal" that the Right Wingnuts and racists use inappropriately to sling mud at the President.
What Ms. Lerner's concern is the way Teapublican groups act as "fronts" for the rich to grab seats in government (well, their stooges that is).
Your concern is misplaced. The IRS was doing their job, Obama was not involved and while you go on a witch hunt, the real villains are getting away with tax evasion and political manipulation.
What Ms. Lerner's concern is the way Teapublican groups act as "fronts" for the rich to grab seats in government (well, their stooges that is).
Your concern is misplaced. The IRS was doing their job, Obama was not involved and while you go on a witch hunt, the real villains are getting away with tax evasion and political manipulation.
I know.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/09/16/charlie-rangel-trouble-again-funny-money
Hes racist too, i agree:
Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY) made some colorful remarks in a Daily Beast interview released Friday. Most notably, he called Tea Partiers and other Republicans "white crackers."
"
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/taylor...el-calls-tea-partiers-white-crackers-n1655110
WoundedEgo
New member
These policemen are whom your quote has him calling "crackers":
http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/greatworks1/files/2013/02/segregation.jpg
Here's what your quote:
"It is the same group we faced in the South with those white crackers and the dogs and the police."
The term seems to derive from those who "cracked a whip" at slaves and blacks in the process of enslavement, control and systematic suppression of their race. It is an appropriate word for the discussion.
That you would go on a witch hunt to find this singular mention while keeping a deaf ear to the overt racism in the Teapublican movement is telling.
http://blsciblogs.baruch.cuny.edu/greatworks1/files/2013/02/segregation.jpg
Here's what your quote:
"It is the same group we faced in the South with those white crackers and the dogs and the police."
The term seems to derive from those who "cracked a whip" at slaves and blacks in the process of enslavement, control and systematic suppression of their race. It is an appropriate word for the discussion.
That you would go on a witch hunt to find this singular mention while keeping a deaf ear to the overt racism in the Teapublican movement is telling.
WoundedEgo
New member
You cant read can you, he said todays teaparty people are the same as them and he called them ALL crackers.
At any rate, theres a wholly corrupt and racist democrat for you.
WoundedEgo
New member
IRS
IRS
What a witch hunt this whole IRS "scandal" is. The IRS was doing its job. Obama was not involved. Yet you delight in suggesting that he was. Wicked man.
IRS
What a witch hunt this whole IRS "scandal" is. The IRS was doing its job. Obama was not involved. Yet you delight in suggesting that he was. Wicked man.
Yes.
I'm waiting for the Obama contingent to blame Bush for the IRS shenanigans.
The Gestapo, alias the IRS, does it's job with a vengeance and a specific vendetta against those not in power.
They destroy people just because they can!
WoundedEgo
New member
When one is addressing an idiot one must rant in an idiot's language.
:yawn: Ad hominem
WoundedEgo
New member
I've re-posted without the evaluation of your character (which is not what ad hominem is about).
"Obama was not involved. Yet you delight in suggesting that he was."
Ad hominen is when you say that one's position is disqualified by character flaws. What I was suggesting is that you opinions were the reflection of your lack of character. Very different.
I often like to suggest that people brush up on logical fallacies.
"Obama was not involved. Yet you delight in suggesting that he was."
Ad hominen is when you say that one's position is disqualified by character flaws. What I was suggesting is that you opinions were the reflection of your lack of character. Very different.
I often like to suggest that people brush up on logical fallacies.
:yawn: Ad hominem
WoundedEgo
New member
Do you think Obama was involved? Why?
WoundedEgo
New member
Do you think there was wrong-doing? Why?
Where is your proof that Obama was not involved? Other than the fact that he is an indecisive, spineless wimp?
WoundedEgo
New member
"Innocent until proven guilty".