Identity By Ideology

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Signs-Point-to-Yes-300x189.jpg

you are the walrus. i am the eggman. stuck in the middle with you. sweaty teddy:jazz:
 

resodko

BANNED
Banned
It's about Americans identifying themselves by the ideology they subscribe to.




what makes you think they do?


because you see them interviewed on tv in the context of their ideologies?


if you asked me at a scout awards meeting what i was, i would have said i'm an adult leader and the father of two scouts

if you ask me at school what i am, i'll say that i'm a freshman student

if you ask me at a tea party rally what i am, i'll probably say that i'm a conservative


if you ask me, absent any other context, what i am, my first response will probably be that i'm the father of two boys




do yourself a favor purex, and unplug
 
Last edited:

Quincy

New member
I don't think it's that simple. I have no doubt that the media inflames ideological argument for the sake of ratings, but that doesn't explain why we go along with it: why we allow ourselves to become 'inflamed'. It doesn't explain why we volunteer to become 'ideology warriors', ourselves.

And it's hard to ask this question here on TOL because this is a site designed for ideological warfare. The people who use this site tend not to be able to see themselves as the extreme ideologues that they are.

Perhaps some people grew up in families or churches where they learned to value exoteric ideals too much. Indoctrination, I suppose. Though that doesn't explain why people do that in the first place. It's probably some side effect of being a social creature. We have to establish those cliques and defend them, I guess.
 

PureX

Well-known member
People is past times did consider themselves republican or democrat, liberal or conservative, religious or agnostic, capitalist or socialist; however, they did NOT see this as identity! In many cases, they did not see it as ideology either, except utopian ideology, such as Walden- Communism-socialism, in minority in USA
So why do you think so many people are identifying themselves via their ideology, these days? What's changed?

(By the way, that was a great observation about utopianism. That has been a distinctly American ideological phenomena in the U.S. for many years, thought it's rare, even here.)
 

PureX

Well-known member
Perhaps some people grew up in families or churches where they learned to value exoteric ideals too much. Indoctrination, I suppose. Though that doesn't explain why people do that in the first place. It's probably some side effect of being a social creature. We have to establish those cliques and defend them, I guess.
I think we humans do sometimes use the 'us vs them' pattern of ideological warfare to establish and maintain our sub-group unity. But that doesn't necessarily explain why the sudden and dramatic increase in this phenomena.

In my dad's generation there were all kinds of social groups one could join for interaction. My dad was a member of the local Lions Club, the local Usher's Club, and he was a volunteer fireman. Yet although each of these groups had their own purpose and identity, they weren't based on any particular ideology, so much as they were based on a mutual desire for fellowship and community service. They didn't really care who was a republican or a democrat, or who was a liberal or a conservative, or who was sleeping with whom.

Now days, these clubs are all disappearing, because people don't join together simply for the sake of human fellowship and community service, anymore. They're too busy judging and condemning each other's behaviors and ideologies.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
That was before the wrongness of abortion took over your brain and left your head an empty shell.

are you saying feminists did not take over the democratic party
and
that abortion is not their number one issue?
 

The Berean

Well-known member
what makes you think they do?


because you see them interviewed on tv in the context of their ideologies?


if you asked me at a scout awards meeting what i was, i would have said i'm an adult leader and the father of two scouts

if you ask me at school what i am, i'll say that i'm a freshman student

if you ask me at a tea party rally what i am, i'll probably say that i'm a conservative


if you ask me, absent any other context, what i am, my first response will probably be that i'm the father of two boys




do yourself a favor purex, and unplug

In what context would you respond with, "Negro, please!" :p
 

Quincy

New member
I think we humans do sometimes use the 'us vs them' pattern of ideological warfare to establish and maintain our sub-group unity. But that doesn't necessarily explain why the sudden and dramatic increase in this phenomena.

In my dad's generation there were all kinds of social groups one could join for interaction. My dad was a member of the local Lions Club, the local Usher's Club, and he was a volunteer fireman. Yet although each of these groups had their own purpose and identity, they weren't based on any particular ideology, so much as they were based on a mutual desire for fellowship and community service. They didn't really care who was a republican or a democrat, or who was a liberal or a conservative, or who was sleeping with whom.

Now days, these clubs are all disappearing, because people don't join together simply for the sake of human fellowship and community service, anymore. They're too busy judging and condemning each other's behaviors and ideologies.

Hey, maybe more than just time is a flat circle. Maybe human behavior is cyclical and like many other empires, we'll just implode with nothing the cause of it other than instinct and a touch of fate.
 

PureX

Well-known member
One of the things I find puzzling about this phenomena is that one of the common tenets of the world's major religions is that the ego must be controlled, or subjugated in some way. Nearly every religion on Earth has recognized that the root of a great percentage of human suffering is the result of human ego: that auto-defense mechanism that develops and protects one's idea of oneself. Which makes it all the more odd, then, that so many religionists these days are confusing their idea of God and divine righteousness with their own ego-centric identities, and fancying themselves as divine policemen, and the spokespeople for God's own truth, will, and judgment. This would seem to me to be the height of egotism, rather than the subjugation of it.
 
Top