Where's your answer to the initial question? Perhaps I missed it somewhere in your eloquent riposte?drbrumley said:Yes, I have an answer. Too bad folks like you don't care for it. Suit yourself I suppose.
Now where's your followup question.?
drbrumley said:Do you Callie really need that question answered?
drbrumley said:I would only say WHY should God stop crime when he has delegated that authority to us?
BillyBob said:I never said that we shouldn't question the government. I said that I support Capital punishment and I said that God isn't doing anything to stop crime so it is up to us as humans to do so.
Try reading my comments again and stop trying to change the subject.
Zakath said:Where's your answer to the initial question? Perhaps I missed it somewhere in your eloquent riposte?
Caille said:I never said that you said that we shouldn't question the government. I understand your point and agree with it. But, to those who depend on a literal interpretation of scripture (not you BillyBob), I want to know how they square Romans13 with the reality of the current capital punishment laws (or abortion laws).
As far as I can tell, the subject as started by Freak is whether capital punishment as sanctioned by the government is biblically defensible. If you read Romans13 literally, there doesn't seem to be any wiggle room. Whatever the government decides to do is OK with God.
I'm sort of surprised it's that lowdrbrumley said:It costs approximately $72.39 per day to incarcerate a Death Row inmate in Florida.
Is that the really good ammo?BillyBob said:It costs 50 cents to put a bullet in his head.
For a head shot at close range, why not use the cheap stuff... :Grizzly:BillyBob said:Jacketed hollow points!
Probably not. Just do the executions outside next to the compost heap and it reduces clean up time considerably.BillyBob said:I'd like to see what a hollow point will do to a head at close range.
[I'm guessing there won't be much head left....]
Because I'm a cheap Celt... a good axe would be even cheaper...Besides, 50 cents is a lot cheaper than keeping him alive for 20 years at $80 a day, why not spring for the best.
Whatever floats yer boat. :thumb:Tell you what, I'll buy the ammo!!! :banana:
So, I looked here...one4christ said:So far in this thread, I haven't seen one reference to scripture in regard to the justification of taking the life of a rapist...I'll bet I could find some of your posts elsewhere in TOL that back up your views using reasoned arguments from scripture -- and so I will look for those after my post.
drbrumley said:"He who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:12
"He who strikes his father or his mother shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:15
"He who kidnaps a man... shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:16
"He who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death." Ex. 21:17
"[If an unborn baby is killed] you shall give life for life." Ex. 21:23
one4christ said:1. The death penalty for ALL OT crimes that were punishable by death should still be enforced, and the NT covenant did not abolish the OT Mosaic law in regard to these.
Nope. I can think of one off the top of my head. Observance of the Sabbath.2. The specific OT Mosaic laws in regard to the death penalty were no longer applicable WHERE they applied specifically to the levitical (priesthood) laws. Other OT laws requiring the death penalty should still in effect.
That one is most definitely false. We are under the legal authorities, but should advocate the laws that would make this a better place. Including the death penalty for murderers, rapists, child molesters and homosexuals.3. The NT did away with all OT laws and requirements, but we are still under the civil and governing authorities, including the death penalty as defined in the OT if it is in effect.
This is untrue as well.4. The NT did away with the death penalty altogether, and some form other form of punishment could be applied, but not death. This would mean that governing authorities that institute the death penalty are in conflict with the bible.
I've already explained this is untrue.So, I am leaning toword #3 from what scriptures I have read, and fleshing it out a bit more -
Any law that is instituted by the governing authorities, where that law does not directly violate the standards of God's word, should be followed as an adherence to God's word.
Where does it say anything about teenagers, or hitting parents? And murderers should be put to death. And women who get abortions should be put to death.If this is true, then the following could all be true if our government instituted these as laws:
Murderers could be put to death, Teenagers who hit their parents, Child abductors (even the astranged parent), a child who curses their parent (curses as in condemns, as in damnation I believe), a woman who gets an abortion could all be put to death The operative word here is COULD be, doesn't 'have' to be. I would assume that rape would be included in the list but I haven't found any scriptural reference to that yet.
No doubt.By what some would call 'modern sensibilities', this all seems extreme. I haven't developed a complete position on this based on the scriptures yet. Since I am not that familiar with old testament laws and requirements, I will have to continue to look into this further.
There are plenty of explanations. Just look for threads on theonomy, and see what its supporters have to say.If anyone has any other thoughts on 1) other possible alternate positions than those listed above, 2) why they hold a certain postion, or 3) where I can find further info on this topic either on the web or elsewhere.
The laws that called for the death penalty that no longer apply are the ones that related to the laws that were only for Israel. No laws concerning the Sabbath are applicable. No laws concerning the priesthood are applicable. No laws that concern lineage are applicable.... or, perhaps if someone holds one of the above views, they could post their (complete) reasoning from the scripture here, since it seemed that previous posts were a smattering of bits and pieces of these different perspectives.
Thanks Lighthouse! They can post here if they like also. In the meantime I am exploring other perspecitves on this topic and would like to hear from others too.Lighthouse said:Talk to Jefferson, Bob Enyart, and Clete. They support theonomy, and can show you why, from Scripture, and logic.
Lighthouse said:women who get abortions should be put to death.
The laws that called for the death penalty that no longer apply are the ones that related to the laws that were only for Israel.
No laws concerning the Sabbath are applicable.
No laws concerning the priesthood are applicable.
No laws that concern lineage are applicable.
Talk to Jefferson, Bob Enyart, and Clete. They support theonomy, and can show you why, from Scripture, and logic.
fool said:Lighthouse: are you over here killing women who had abortions?
Didn't we cover this?
I think you might want to put some conditions on that.
Like "women who had unnesasary abortions should be put to death"
Lest you confuse any rational people who wandered in here.