Mutations make people sick.
No two ways about it.
Wrong. There are people immune to HIV infection because of a mutation.
There are others that require far less sleep due to a mutation.
Are you lactose tolerant? People that can drink milk as adults can do so because of a mutation.
And there are different mutations depending on which part of the world people are from.
They never improve genetic integrity; they are always — 100 percent of them — bad for information.
There's no such thing as "genetic integrity", there is only useful or not in a particular situation.
Organisms that are clonal are evidence for the fact that mutations are always bad. Variation in the genome of a population — ie, within a kind — shows degradation. Genetic integrity is where a population has less genetic diversity.
Are you saying genetic variation is BAD? :dizzy: If this is really what you're saying you do not understand biology at all.
We know, we know: Cheetahs. They do not represent the population that their DNA came from. Thus they are evidence that diversity leads to reduced "fitness."
Huh? They have virtually NO genetic diversity. Cheetahs can receive skin grafts from one another due to lack of diversity in their MHC genes. That same lack of diversity makes them vulnerable to disease.
Darwinists accused a YEC of this tactic, unfairly calling it a "Gish gallop." However, it is them who use it all the time.
Not at all. He says evolution causes more disease. If he's arguing creation wouldn't cause disease, how did infectious organisms and parasites arise. If they are created, then there's not much of a difference between the two. Thus the question is quite related.
A Gish gallop is where you simply bring up dozens of unrelated items to distract from the question.