De nada. With quotes. The easiest way I've found to divide a thing up is to leave the opening tag alone then type in [/ quote] (without the space, of course) to end the first part you mean to respond to.Wow ,
Really appreciate the response,
From that point on all you have to do is drag and click over each part you want to respond to and, leaving it highlighted, then click the quote bubble directly above where you're typing that looks like a dialogue bubble from a comic book or strip. It's just to the right of the icon that resembles a post card.
Eras the stuff you don't want to respond to, of course, and always give a quick look by clicking Preview Post button before you click on Submit Reply to check for mistakes. Makes a difference. I only offer because I can see you were making the attempt but a lot of it went awry.
Okay, but you're using fairly negative descriptions of them throughout and either that's you looking back and applying a context or, taking it as written, it's you being more negative than you realize and maybe they saw that as well. Else, as I said, they seemed more eager than prepared, but that happens.I do and have given your point careful consideration , yes i would say it was that way instead of the guys offering views , i was being told firmly that God has decreed this and that and that these guys interpretation of these decrees are correct , when i tried to offer alternative interpretation i was waved off.
I like how you couch it, but skepticism is a bit different, as definitions go and so my attempt to clarify on the point. I appreciate your response though. As I said, if you're open to truth it has a way of finding you. Can't ask for more at this point.Ok you can decide... i have called myself a skeptic , however i am quite open to the suggestion of God , in fact would welcome his existence and try to live my life in a way that reflects Christian values .. not because they are Christian but because i think they are good values.
I generally find that whenever I make myself the complete hero of my narrative (and that's about as human as can be) I'm usually at least a little mistaken. At the very least I've failed to consider the other narrative and that whoever runs it is likely the hero of theirs too.So maybe skeptic is not a valid description .. but thankyou for the response some thought provoking questions and i had to question my behavior and honesty to respond.
It can change things when you reflect on it from that perspective. Thanks for the consideration and response. :cheers: And welcome aboard, again.