Take a star just 12,000 light years away, according to your notion the space between that star and us must have been expanded to at least twice it's original length (halving the frequency).
You seem to be assuming that the 6000 years since the expansion stopped has something to do with when the star was formed.
It has nothing to do with when the star was formed.
I repeat.
The Red Shift would be the same in either case because the Red Shift does not depend on the rate of expansion but instead on the amount of expansion, which is the same in both Guth's theory and mine.