Great news for me!

[Hoping]

You're afraid to read even news sources like Time, PBS, Salon, Science, etc... You might have to change your mind to fit your beliefs to reality. I find it really sad that your prejudice runs so deep you call MSM news sources "wingers" when they tell you what don't lwnt to hear. I hadn't seen it so many times before I'd say it was unbelievable.

Afraid...nah.
Uninterested in the "take" of the unclean is more like it.
BTW, it was you who called your cited magazine(?) Salon a "winger".

 

[Gary K]

Afraid...nah.
Uninterested in the "take" of the unclean is more like it.
BTW, it was you who called your cited magazine(?) Salon a "winger".

No, it was you. I gave you an MSN source, in fact several of them, and you said you weren't interested in sources from "wingers' so you consider the source a 'winger' even though you would normally read everything any of the sources I pointed out. So you think anything that agrees with a "winger" to be a "winger" as you'll ignore it no matter how true it is.

You're anxious to remain ignorant. Your prejudice is killing you .

 

[Hoping]

No, it was you. I gave you an MSN source, in fact several of them, and you said you weren't interested in sources from "wingers' so you consider the source a 'winger' even though you would normally read everything any of the sources I pointed out. So you think anything that agrees with a "winger" to be a "winger" as you'll ignore it no matter how true it is.

You're anxious to remain ignorant. Your prejudice is killing you .

If it is true, the "wingers" will diverge from it.
The truth is in the middle.

 

[Gary K]

If it is true, the "wingers" will diverge from it.
The truth is in the middle.

You have lived with you're eyes wide shut for decades.

 

[Hoping]

You have lived with you're eyes wide shut for decades.

Do you feel that a "winger" CAN present the truth?
The bias inherent in the "wing" concept makes it doubtful.

 

[Gary K]

Do you feel that a "winger" CAN present the truth?
The bias inherent in the "wing" concept makes it doubtful.

The bias is assumed as human nature guarantees we are all going to view events from different perspectives, different levels of intelligence, and to different levels of knowledge of the events and trust in those doing the reporting. Your assumption is that anyone who doesn't think MSM journalists are pure as the driven snow is a loon. I find that bizarre as the basis of your attitudes toward those who don't trust them is that they are brain damaged. Your entire attitude is a violation of human nature. If it wasn't you would at least investigate what they have to say to see if they know something you don't. Instead you assume you know it all and they can't possibly be correct. How is that possible if you don't assume that no one can possibly know anything you don't?

 

[Hoping]

The bias is assumed as human nature guarantees we are all going to view events from different perspectives, different levels of intelligence, and to different levels of knowledge of the events and trust in those doing the reporting.

Agreed

Your assumption is that anyone who doesn't think MSM journalists are pure as the driven snow is a loon.

I don't know anything about MSM or its journalists.

I find that bizarre as the basis of your attitudes toward those who don't trust them is that they are brain damaged.

I don't recall ever saying something like that.

Your entire attitude is a violation of human nature.

I thank God for that, as I left the "human" in the dust many years ago.
I now walk in and after the Spirit,...thanks be to God.

If it wasn't you would at least investigate what they have to say to see if they know something you don't. Instead you assume you know it all and they can't possibly be correct. How is that possible if you don't assume that no one can possibly know anything you don't?

By describing an entity as "wing" you automatically thrust them into the environs of the "not centered".
As I never see any centrists writing here, it stands to reason everything is "wing" oriented.
I don't trust any of it.

 

[Derf]

I just know an infusion of sodium is associated with increased blood pressure and if it is high to begin with it could be dangerous. I don't fall for big pharma or corp america. You should know that. Don't get on my bad side.

@ffreeloader
I'd like to give you my story. I was intrigued about the idea of alkalinizing ones body/blood stream, mainly because I've dealt with gout for over a decade. Gout is usually described as being caused by too much uric acid. So after I read ffreeloader's post, I decided to try Baking soda. I started with a partial teaspoon once a day and worked up to 2 per day. After an initial gout flare up, I haven't had any gout trouble for about 6 months. And that was after I went off my prescribed uric acid reduction medicine.

But there's more. I checked my blood pressure (i don't own a sphignomenometer, so I'd check it at a store that has one of those machines). It started to rise, from a healthy 120/80 to about 130/88. But then it began to drop, until it hit about 115/75--pretty decent!

But there's more. My wife and daughter both got some kind of respiratory virus, not once but twice this year, where they were sick and coughing for weeks. I had a little postnasal drip both times that lasted for a couple days.

I can't guarantee that all of that is from the baking soda, but I'm convinced there are some health benefits. And the gout had been driving me crazy.