God told me who HE wants for president '16?

[drbrumley]

Because eminent domain is a bad thing (or at least in the Libertarian world of people like brumley it is).

By the way brumley, did you know that eminent domain has been around since biblical times and that the 5th Amendment to the US Constitution allows it? (You Libertarians are constitutionalists aren't you brumley?).

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/eminent+domain

Nice pic Sherlock! And the Constitution allowed slavery. Will you defend slavery as well? Moron!

Well, there you have it folks. AcW believes it is ok to steal. Pretty cut and dried. And your a professed cop?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Nice pic Sherlock! And the Constitution allowed slavery. Will you defend slavery as well? Moron!

Well, there you have it folks. AcW believes it is ok to steal. Pretty cut and dried. And your a professed cop?

Here, let me help brumley:

So Chrys aCultureWarrior is a socialist, maybe even a fascist. ANY person who is in favor of the pipeline, you are no Conservative. You are to be labeled henceforth a socialist at least, a fascist at worst.

Ahhhh, that's better, I was beginning to feel left out.

(Pssst, brumley, it's not theft if you're paid for your property, and paid quite well I might add).

 

[drbrumley]

Here, let me help brumley:



Ahhhh, that's better; I was beginning to feel left out.

That's probably the most truth in one post you ever posted.....

 

[drbrumley]

(Pssst, brumley, it's not theft if you're paid for your property, and paid quite well I might add).

It just flys over your head. Not surprising. I'm glad your here to point out the obvious.

 

[chrysostom]

So Chrys is a socialist, maybe even a fascist. ANY person who is in favor of the pipeline, you are no Conservative. You are to be labeled henceforth a socialist at least, a fascist at worst.

Chrys here has no issue whatsoever of allowing a FOREIGN company to kick AMERICANS off their own property.

The fact that a government can force you off your own property shows that property rights are not secure, even in the U.S. As the great economist Murray Rothbard put it:



“Certainly no one can say that the inviolability of private property is protected by the government. And when government confers this power on a particular business, it is conferring upon it the special privilege of taking property by force.”

:up: Chrys, Take heed of Nick is telling you.

well I have to admit
he is making more sense than you are

 

[drbrumley]

well I have to admit
he is making more sense than you are

What doesn't make sense Chrys? You not supporting property rights of people?

 

[chrysostom]

What doesn't make sense Chrys?

abortion
divorce
same sex marriage
government run healthcare
islam
liberal propaganda
government union workers

 

[drbrumley]

abortion
divorce
same sex marriage
government run healthcare
islam
liberal propaganda
government union workers

So why don't you support property rights?

 

[chrysostom]

So why don't you support property rights?

I do

I do support property rights

 

[JosephR]

lol,,this whole thing is lolsuace...

 

[JosephR]

So why don't you support property rights?

here is you supporting property rights,,, you think you own your home? try not payng taxes on it,,and see whom owns whom..

 

[JosephR]

abortion
divorce
same sex marriage
government run healthcare
islam
liberal propaganda
government union workers

do you ,, a knowledgeable person in the end times,,, not know it will be like the days of Noah?

 

[chrysostom]

do you ,, a knowledgeable person in the end times,,, not know it will be like the days of Noah?

no I don't
so
how do you know?

 

[JosephR]

no I don't
so
how do you know?

a bird told me..

 

[JosephR]

no I don't
so
how do you know?

so..

did you rebuke the winds and waves..


or get on the ARK?

 

[chrysostom]

so..

did you rebuke the winds and waves..


or get on the ARK?

no

what are you suggesting?

 

[drbrumley]

I do

I do support property rights

Really? But yet you support a foreign company to kick people off their land by eminent domain when the property owner doesn't want to sell. So in truth, you do not support property rights. You think you do, but it doesn't pass the smell test. For if you were for property rights, you would not be for this pipeline at this time.

 

[drbrumley]

Duh!!!

Duh!!!

here is you supporting property rights,,, you think you own your home? try not payng taxes on it,,and see whom owns whom..

You think I don't know that already? I'm fighting to abolish these ridiculous laws.

 

[chrysostom]

Really? But yet you support a foreign company to kick people off their land by eminent domain when the property owner doesn't want to sell. So in truth, you do not support property rights. You think you do, but it doesn't pass the smell test. For if you were for property rights, you would not be for this pipeline at this time.

I figured that might be a trick question

I also support oil companies, canada, and whoever needs energy

sorry about that

 

[drbrumley]

I figured that might be a trick question

It wasn't. It is pretty clear where you stand.

I also support oil companies, canada, and whoever needs energy

So do I. But why can't a property owner say no to sell? I have no issues with a property owner selling if that is his decision to make. But under threat, why is this even remotely acceptable?