Gay marriage

[Hedshaker]

It doesn't matter who man joins together, what matters is who God joins. It's un-natural and it's not God's design. Hetero couples can have their own children, DNA from each parent by means of natural sexual relations. Homo couples can not have their own children, they have to have a third party involved or adopt. They're genitalia do not fit naturally and they're perverted sexual relations do not produce offspring because it's un-natural.

And yet, every single gay person enters this world via an heterosexual union. Your obvious bigotry aside, homosexuality appears to exist under nature. They are just different is all and, if you don't like that then so be it. They can now legally marry and there's nothing you or your God can do about it.

c'est la vie :carryon:

 

[turbosixx]

And yet, every single gay person enters this world via an heterosexual union. Your obvious bigotry aside, homosexuality appears to exist under nature. They are just different is all and, if you don't like that then so be it. They can now legally marry and there's nothing you or your God can do about it.

c'est la vie :carryon:

This is the only reason I don't like it.

4And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'? 6So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."

If God had wanted homos to have sexual unions, they would be able to have children.

 

[Hedshaker]

This is the only reason I don't like it.

4And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'? 6So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."

If God had wanted homos to have sexual unions, they would be able to have children.

Well, it looks like your God's opinion has been superseded in law on this issue, which, in a secular society, is all that really matters.

And, not all heterosexual unions are able to produce children, not to mention that some do not by choice.

 

[gcthomas]

This is the only reason I don't like it.

4And He answered and said, "Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'? 6So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."

If God had wanted homos to have sexual unions, they would be able to have children.

That passage reads as if every man and woman must marry, with no exceptions. Harsh.

 

[Rusha]

If God had wanted homos to have sexual unions, they would be able to have children.

So a heterosexual couple who is married and cannot have children should not be together?

 

[Angel4Truth]

And yet, every single gay person enters this world via an heterosexual union. Your obvious bigotry aside, homosexuality appears to exist under nature. They are just different is all and, if you don't like that then so be it. They can now legally marry and there's nothing you or your God can do about it.

c'est la vie :carryon:

And yet, every single sinner/pedophile/bisexual/polygamous/adulterous person enters this world via an heterosexual union. Your obvious bigotry aside, these things appear to exist under nature. They are just different is all and, if you don't like that then so be it.

Right?

 

[gcthomas]

And yet, every single sinner/pedophile/bisexual/polygamous/adulterous person enters this world via an heterosexual union. Your obvious bigotry aside, these things appear to exist under nature. They are just different is all and, if you don't like that then so be it.

Right?

I object to people who harm others. You object to people for what they are regardless of whether they cause any actual harm.

 

[quip]

If God had wanted homos to have sexual unions, they would be able to have children.

The only problem with the "natural" argument is, well...if God didn't want us to naturally die from polio...He would've created for us a natural resistance to the disease.

As it stands, we not only defy nature on a daily basis to fit our needs...we're quite proud of our accomplishments in doing so.

 

[Hedshaker]

And yet, every single sinner/pedophile/bisexual/polygamous/adulterous person enters this world via an heterosexual union. Your obvious bigotry aside, these things appear to exist under nature. They are just different is all and, if you don't like that then so be it.

Right?

The law appears to have more to say than you think. Are you really equating same sex relationships by consenting adults with paedophilia?

 

[turbosixx]

Well. it looks like your God's opinion has been superseded in law on this issue, which, in a secular society, is all that really matters.

Man can do whatever he desires but that doesn't make it right.

British Woman Weds Dog In Expensive ‘Romantic’ Wedding Ceremony – After Marriage To Man Failed

She can have sex with this dog, doesn't make it right.

 

[Hedshaker]

I object to people who harm others. You object to people for what they are regardless of whether they cause any actual harm.

Hear, hear :salute:

 

[turbosixx]

The only problem with the "natural" argument is, well...if God didn't want us to naturally die from polio...He would've created for us a natural resistance to the disease.

As it stands, we not only defy nature on a daily basis to fit our needs...we're quite proud of our accomplishments in doing so.

Apples and oranges.

 

[quip]

Apples and oranges.

Your bias notwithstanding...of course.

BTW apples and oranges are both natural. :chuckle:

 

[turbosixx]

Your bias notwithstanding...or course.

If God wanted us to all die from "polio", don't you think we would?

 

[Angel4Truth]

So a heterosexual couple who is married and cannot have children should not be together?

The purpose and intent of a leg doesn't change if it is blown off.

Just as intent and purpose of marriage and the womb doesn't change if it doesn't work.

 

[quip]

If God wanted us to all die from "polio", don't you think we would?

Don't you think we would find a way to defy it's natural effect....wait, we did! :idea:

 

[Hedshaker]

Man can do whatever he desires but that doesn't make it right.

She can have sex with this dog, doesn't make it right.

Don't hold back there. I'm sure there's more grime you could scrape from the bottom of that barrel :sheep:

 

[gcthomas]

She can have sex with this dog, doesn't make it right.

She didn't marry the dog and cannot legally have sex with the dog.

Don't believe everything you see on t'internet.

 

[turbosixx]

So a heterosexual couple who is married and cannot have children should not be together?

Children not the reason for marriage but a blessing, besides, zero homo couples can have their own kids. I would think any homo that believed in God would hate him. Why would he not allow them to have children with their "partner"?

 

[Angel4Truth]

The law appears to have more to say than you think. Are you really equating same sex relationships by consenting adults with paedophilia?

yes, and with adultery, polygamy etc.. its all sins of the flesh.