Free speech has become white supremacy
- Thread starter kmoney
- Start date
Because nothing says that true conservatives don't belong in the company of racists quite like the genuine horror and complaints relating.
Come on, dr. Really?
"a country will not last without patriots,"
Whatever the area in North America now called the U.S. is named, that area with some population,could still exist if the present day Marxists were able to help create a totalitarian world government and a collectivist society.
But the U.S. is defined as a country by its borders and its Culture, and also by its Constitutional Republic and its language. Putting the U.S. under a world totalitarian government with a fascist corporate ruling elite at the top and a Communist regime at the bottom, with a collectivist society would mean we no longer have a country and the patriots have lost.
Of the wars the U.S. has fought since the end of world war II, only one, even in part, helped to protect our country defined above from the threat of Communist takeover,
The U.S. was defeated in the Viet-Nam war and our forces ran out of Viet-Nam.
The Korean War to some extent was also fought for the sake of what Eisenhower was later to call the Military-Industrial Complex, run by the Neo-Cons. But though we fought to a standoff, we did not leave South Korea to the Communists and that was a small victory., It may have saved Japan from communist takeover and slowed down the Communists in the Cold War which ended in the nineties.
Are not the guys who fought in Korea the patriots, even though many of them were drafted into the Army, which the Air Force called the Ground Pounders. After the Red Chinese entered the Korean War, our ground forces were outnumbered. The small victory we gained in leaving South Korea free of Communist control, was due in large part to the Air Force, who, with the 8th Army Artillery, held back the hordes of Red Chinese.
Whatever the area in North America now called the U.S. is named, that area with some population,could still exist if the present day Marxists were able to help create a totalitarian world government and a collectivist society.
But the U.S. is defined as a country by its borders and its Culture, and also by its Constitutional Republic and its language. Putting the U.S. under a world totalitarian government with a fascist corporate ruling elite at the top and a Communist regime at the bottom, with a collectivist society would mean we no longer have a country and the patriots have lost.
Of the wars the U.S. has fought since the end of world war II, only one, even in part, helped to protect our country defined above from the threat of Communist takeover,
The U.S. was defeated in the Viet-Nam war and our forces ran out of Viet-Nam.
The Korean War to some extent was also fought for the sake of what Eisenhower was later to call the Military-Industrial Complex, run by the Neo-Cons. But though we fought to a standoff, we did not leave South Korea to the Communists and that was a small victory., It may have saved Japan from communist takeover and slowed down the Communists in the Cold War which ended in the nineties.
Are not the guys who fought in Korea the patriots, even though many of them were drafted into the Army, which the Air Force called the Ground Pounders. After the Red Chinese entered the Korean War, our ground forces were outnumbered. The small victory we gained in leaving South Korea free of Communist control, was due in large part to the Air Force, who, with the 8th Army Artillery, held back the hordes of Red Chinese.
Seemed like.
Don't go all dodge on me now. Are you referencing a federal ct. ruling on the 2015 law that "requires companies that hire or contract with drivers of taxis, for-hire transportation companies and app-based services to bargain with them if a majority show they want to be represented"?
So expanding the rights of workers to negotiate for a better wage is dictatorship and the companies ability to dictate terms absent the law is what, democratic?
lain:Then you need to distinguish between criminals and liberals, much as it might pain you.
An interesting point to debate outside the topic, where it remains at present.
Seriously, nothing funnier than some right wingers making light of racism between defenses of Confederate memorials.
And by funnier I mean, of course, illustrative of why you have that ring around your basin when you finish attempting to wash your hands.
All that time and you still have the one idea.
lain:
:up:
:up:
That's too distorted an analogy to be funny.
lain:
Statue hater.All that time and you still have the one idea.
Do you romanticize Nazi symbols? Would you think constructing a few monuments to Hitler is a good way for Germans to honor their past?
And a homo.
Interplanner
Well-known member
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/08/2...ck-clad-anarchists-storm-rightwing-rally.html
...so it is quite clear that "free" means PC allowed only. And is someone going to deny that the antifa seek the end of the US? "...no USA at all!"
Why isn't the expression of that on the property of the US an act of sedition? Because it happened in San Francisco, which wants to secede!
...so it is quite clear that "free" means PC allowed only. And is someone going to deny that the antifa seek the end of the US? "...no USA at all!"
Why isn't the expression of that on the property of the US an act of sedition? Because it happened in San Francisco, which wants to secede!
Interplanner
Well-known member
A thought on statues.
There are collections of antiquity in museums that have statues of some ridiculous people from the past. that would be the place to remove offensive statues. Have an informational display about it, but not in the middle of a public square.
Or there is example of the city of Sacramento, when they realized a park was named for a proto-Nazi who did research on eugenics in California under Sanger. They renamed the park. They guy was also popular for starting 'interpretive rangers' in Yosemite. Yet he actually wanted to liquidate the Myuk indians of the Yosemite area.
There are collections of antiquity in museums that have statues of some ridiculous people from the past. that would be the place to remove offensive statues. Have an informational display about it, but not in the middle of a public square.
Or there is example of the city of Sacramento, when they realized a park was named for a proto-Nazi who did research on eugenics in California under Sanger. They renamed the park. They guy was also popular for starting 'interpretive rangers' in Yosemite. Yet he actually wanted to liquidate the Myuk indians of the Yosemite area.
