7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Ah, keeping your election denial short and sweet, I see. Well, it makes sense, since you've no facts to present in support thereof.
Ah, keeping your election denial short and sweet, I see. Well, it makes sense, since you've no facts to present in support thereof.
When did Jill Biden have her hair cut sort like that? Is that a photo of Jill Biden?
She lost by the proverbial mile and you don't get to downplay the majority vote. She lost, plain and simple. Still, she's made plenty of dollars out of it all hasn't she?That was no doubt just a small percentage of the fraudulent votes cast for her opponent.
Denial is all you've got, sure ain't facts...Denials can never annul the fact of voter fraud.
I wonder when the MAGA brigade actually "think" America was previously 'great' and how far back that was?
"Dr." "First 'Lady'" Jill.That's Dr Jill to you, peon!
Yes.
ExactlyRepublicans can say whatever they want in words that dismiss the issue
Here, you've just pointed out how useless it is for Democrats to keep mindlessly chanting the word, "evidence", since rationally-thinking people know that Democrats have no evidence to accompany their chant.
Thomas Liddy, the division chief for the Civil Services Division of the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and a Republican, said in the letter that "no voter was disenfranchised because of the difficulty the county experienced with some of its printers.”
Republicans can say whatever they want in words that dismiss the issue, but the facts remain.
Um, @Stripe was pointing out that Thomas Liddy, the "Republican" @annabenedetti quoted as having said "no voter was disenfranchised because of the difficulty the county experienced with some of its printers," was, in saying that, dismissing the fact of election fraud and printer tampering that resulted in voter disenfranchisement. And, because of your hastiness and stupidity and addiction to displaying it, you just conceded @Stripe's point by saying "Exactly". Bravo, @User Name.Exactly
ExactlyUm, @Stripe was pointing out that Thomas Liddy, the "Republican" @annabenedetti quoted as having said "no voter was disenfranchised because of the difficulty the county experienced with some of its printers," was, in saying that, dismissing the fact of election fraud and printer tampering that resulted in voter disenfranchisement.
Kari lake lost by 17000 plus votes.Yes.
Republicans can say whatever they want in words that dismiss the issue, but the facts remain.
The printers were manipulated.
The tabulators could not read the ballots.
People left because of the delays.
Facts
The printers were manipulated.
The tabulators could not read the ballots.
People left because of the delays.
Facts
Exactly
Fact.
Since you agree that that "Republican", Thomas Liddy, dismissed the fact of election fraud, why do you not condemn him for doing so? Why do you consider it good for someone to dismiss fact (something you do constantly, @User Name)?Exactly
I commend her for her effort to overthrow the wicked and their fraud.
How much money have you ... donated to her legal efforts to overturn fraudulent election results?
America is fast becoming like Russia. Elections are not to decide winners but simply to give the appearance that the election is decided by voters instead of by crooks and fraudsters who control the elections.