For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Saundra Kiczenski, a 56-year-old from Michigan, told Bender she was "confident" that former President Donald Trump won the 2020 election, according to the book "Frankly, We Did Win This Election," published earlier this week. In the book, Bender detailed former President Donald Trump's effort to overturn the election after becoming the first incumbent in decades to fail to win reelection.

"We weren't there to steal things," Kiczenski, who entered the Capitol on January 6, said, according to the book excerpt. "We weren't there to do damage. We were just there to overthrow the government." But when Trump took to Twitter to urge his supporters to go home, Kiczenski said she felt sad and confused, Bender wrote. "We were supposed to be fighting until the end," she said.

According to the book, then Vice President Mike Pence, who oversaw the congressional vote, refused to evacuate the Capitol despite the Secret Service urging him to leave. Tim Giebels, Pence's lead security agent, asked the vice president "twice" to evacuate the building, to which Pence said "I'm not leaving the Capitol," according to the book. "We need to get back tonight," Pence told top US officials on a call, according to the book. "We can't let the world see that our process of confirming the next president can be delayed."

 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Nobody should trust the Daily Fail frankly. Regardless of how you view Wikipedia it doesn't shy away from providing source material for its claims. Else, go ahead and explain how the page about Bitchute is erroneous. What false claims are being made? Do tell.
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Nobody should trust the Daily Fail frankly. Regardless of how you view Wikipedia it doesn't shy away from providing source material for its claims. Else, go ahead and explain how the page about Bitchute is erroneous. What false claims are being made? Do tell.
I think the co-founder of Wikipedia knows what he's talking about on the subject of Wikipedia.
 

marke

Well-known member
As deep investigations draw closer to a conclusion, proof of fraud is being found.


Garland Favorito, representing VoterGA, held a press conference this morning to outline new evidence as a result of a review of Fulton County, Georgia, ballots and tabulation results. VoterGA Press Release pdf available HERE
One of the more distinct findings was the double scanning of ballots creating multiple votes in favor of Joe Biden from the same set of ballots. The duplication of ballots creates the artificial impression of multiple votes from the same set of ballots. Double counting ballots is transparent election fraud.
 

marke

Well-known member
Arizona's ballots have been counted before and certified by the Republican governor. Much of the country has moved on, and yet Republicans are searching for evidence to support claims they already believe.

The 2.1 million ballots were already counted by Maricopa County election officials in November, validated in a partial hand recount and certified by Gov. Doug Ducey. Two extra audits confirmed no issues. No evidence of fraud sufficient to invalidate Joe Biden’s narrow victory in Arizona and Maricopa County has been found.

Despite their obvious partisan biases, the current auditors insist they can be trusted because they’re running an independent and transparent operation. Yet they’re recruiting from right-wing groups. They tried to block media access. They fought in court to not disclose written procedures they’re using to count votes and keep ballots secure. They lost.

Crooked elections officials counted the ballots more than once and still found themselves innocent of fraud. The investigators hired by Senate republicans are finding fraud, so who is right?
 

marke

Well-known member
The insanity should stop here, but unfortunately facts have never fixed crazy before:

Democrats play down their fraud for obvious reasons. Non-partisan investigators are finding ample evidence of fraud. Let's compare the techniques used by both sides to see which can give more reliable results. And let's examine every argument made by both sides to determine which arguments are more persuasive and logical.
 

marke

Well-known member
Only when wack job's like you post in it...

Democrats and lefties continue to slander Americans for demanding investigations to restore faith in elections. Democrats do themselves no favors by demonizing good Americans who just want the facts to be uncovered because they are not persuaded to believe at face value that crooked officials are telling the truth when they say they are not crooked and committed no fraud.
 

marke

Well-known member
Nobody should trust the Daily Fail frankly. Regardless of how you view Wikipedia it doesn't shy away from providing source material for its claims. Else, go ahead and explain how the page about Bitchute is erroneous. What false claims are being made? Do tell.
Nobody should trust men, especially men who show little respect for God. All men should trust God.

Jeremiah 17:5
Thus saith the Lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord.
 

marke

Well-known member
A Trump-appointed federal judge said he had standing to bring the case — a rare departure from other judges
Social media giants shut down conservative and republican voices in 2020 in order to give Biden an advantage. Judges did not want to ignite a race war by allowing voter fraud cases to go forward. There are many reasons government and private leaders refused to look into voter fraud. But that has not stopped some groups from hiring forensic experts to look into the allegations of fraud and those experts are finding enough fraud to claim fraud could have changed the outcome of the election.

If you Google this you will not likely find the facts listed because social media giants have taken it upon themselves to wipe all evidence of fraud and factual reports of fraud from their public reporting. That is called propaganda and it is wicked, but that is to be expected given the anti-God, anti-American, anti-civilization aspects of our modern democrat leadership.
 

marke

Well-known member
So, a Trump appointed federal judge said he had standing to bring the case. And?
A judge says Trump's cases have no merit. Now if only the judge would declare that he found factual evidence that no fraud occurred, but the lying judges and politicians have not yet gone that far in their support of the lying leftist communist democrat party.
 

marke

Well-known member
Saundra Kiczenski, a 56-year-old from Michigan, told Bender she was "confident" that former President Donald Trump won the 2020 election, according to the book "Frankly, We Did Win This Election," published earlier this week. In the book, Bender detailed former President Donald Trump's effort to overturn the election after becoming the first incumbent in decades to fail to win reelection.

"We weren't there to steal things," Kiczenski, who entered the Capitol on January 6, said, according to the book excerpt. "We weren't there to do damage. We were just there to overthrow the government." But when Trump took to Twitter to urge his supporters to go home, Kiczenski said she felt sad and confused, Bender wrote. "We were supposed to be fighting until the end," she said.

According to the book, then Vice President Mike Pence, who oversaw the congressional vote, refused to evacuate the Capitol despite the Secret Service urging him to leave. Tim Giebels, Pence's lead security agent, asked the vice president "twice" to evacuate the building, to which Pence said "I'm not leaving the Capitol," according to the book. "We need to get back tonight," Pence told top US officials on a call, according to the book. "We can't let the world see that our process of confirming the next president can be delayed."

One woman claims she was there to overthrow the illegitimate government so the partisan quack Merrick Garland arrests hundreds of conservatives who have voiced opposition to democrat voter fraud the left keeps dishonestly claiming they did not commit. Not smart on the quack's part.
 

marke

Well-known member
Ok! Here you go:

God-dishonoring leftists keep lying about voter fraud and there is no end to their false claims in efforts to convince Americans the elections were not corrupted. Wise Americans do not believe unproven claims, they want unbiased investigators to examine the facts and evidence to determine whether or not the leftists are lying about fraud.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Arizona's ballots have been counted before and certified by the Republican governor. Much of the country has moved on, and yet Republicans are searching for evidence to support claims they already believe.

The 2.1 million ballots were already counted by Maricopa County election officials in November, validated in a partial hand recount and certified by Gov. Doug Ducey. Two extra audits confirmed no issues. No evidence of fraud sufficient to invalidate Joe Biden’s narrow victory in Arizona and Maricopa County has been found.

Despite their obvious partisan biases, the current auditors insist they can be trusted because they’re running an independent and transparent operation. Yet they’re recruiting from right-wing groups. They tried to block media access. They fought in court to not disclose written procedures they’re using to count votes and keep ballots secure. They lost.

Sore LUser Name has to dredge up a hit piece on the auditors from May 10th, because he can see the truth in recent news.
 
Top