The lesser of two evils is still evil.
For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Um, nope. The forecasts were already in place on all manner of news outlets as to how Trump's lead was going to diminish once mail in ballots were counted and lo and behold, that's what happened. Nothing mysterious about it...you keep deluding yourself that Trump had the election stole from him if you like.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I don't have 'shifting standards' of evidence. The only sort worthwhile is the substantial kind, that's it. Not the 'scanty' sort.
What article? Cite? Clinton conceded the election once the results were obvious. No bleating about it being stolen by the republicans and aided the transition of power without acting like a petulant kid as Trump did when he lost in 2020.
Derf
Well-known member
Um…I already posted it, and I think you replied to it to get to this post. Do you really cite articles that you want others to read, and then don’t read what others cite?
That’s called shifting standards.
Then why did every swing state shut down the count at the same time ? Why were observers run out and cases of votes pulled from under a table and counted with no observers present ?
At least their are a few Republicans that aren’t criminals unlike the demon rats their all thieves and communist.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
They weren't.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Link to it again and I'll address it if I haven't already. I don't actually expect everyone to read through the cites I supply and I usually quote part of the salient source material anyway but I'll provide the whole link regardless. Up to folk if they address them or not.
So, no shifting standards on my part and there never was any in relation to what constitutes worthwhile evidence anyway.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
About as much rationale going on "their" as there is with spelling and grammar.
Lol, sure they did you just are such a political hack you can’t believe your lying eyes.
You have nothing else so by all means divert from the truth.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
By all means, continue to believe that Trump had the election stolen from him. I doubt anything would convince you otherwise. Completely irrelevant to actual reality but hey, that's how it goes.
Derf
Well-known member
I’m not read that interested in you addressing it, but this is it:https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...195d5a-e099-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html
It was in this post of mine to you:https://theologyonline.com/threads/...t-there-was-election-fraud.55334/post-1803470. Hard to miss, since I wasn’t very loquacious in that post, and you did reply.
This was your reply, asking for the very thing that was in my post.
it’s pretty frustrating to give information to a fool who won’t read it and then asks for it again. And you won’t find me using that word often or lightly.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
So, you could have just linked to the post in question then couldn't you? Now that you have then Clinton conceded the election, fact. There was no ridiculous posturing about it being stolen or baseless allegations of fraud either, fact.
As to your latter, of course you use the word lightly and it's just as immature as when others fling 'tard' about and the like.
Clinton didn't posture about fraud because she knew there wasn't any.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Sure, no argument there. A shame Trump couldn't have followed suit.
Indeed … his ego can’t handle the fact that the majority of Americans either hate him or strongly dislike him.
Proud rebels against God and country think everyone thinks like they do, which is stupid. If as many Americans had hated Trump as lying leftists claim, he would have never stomped Hillary in 2016, winning most of middle America and the most electoral votes because of that. Hillary had a very strong showing in big democrat meccas where rumors of voter fraud surface after every election.
Derf
Well-known member
Well, she knew there wasn’t any on Trump’s behalf. And if she asked for audits, her side’s fraud would become evident.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
There's never been any sort of credible accusation that Trump won by fraudulent means in 2016, so that's no surprise.
Just as there hasn't been a credible accusation that he lost in 2020 by any such either. A whole load of posturing, blustering, conspiracy garbage and the like and wow, wouldn't it have been better for Trump just to concede as Clinton did? Months into a Biden presidency and this belaboured stuff is still going on...