Follow Government guidelines for sex, or be labeled a rapist
- Thread starter GFR7
- Start date
GFR7
New member
Uh, no. Actually, it is when I ask that women be as accountable as men for their actions that I get labeled a sexist. Not easy at all.
GFR7
New member
Because it arose from liberal ideology, and owes its origins to liberal causes, that's why.
shagster01
New member
The bill was passed with conservatives voting 100% in favor.
GFR7
New member
I don't care. It's ill-conceived and wrong to its core. They are conservative in name only.
shagster01
New member
Of course you don't care that you are wrong.
You are as bad as liberals blaming Republicans for the Patriot Act. They all, save one, voted for it. It's the ideology of all of them.
On this we agree.
What are the odds that EVERY SINGLE Republican in this story is conservative in name only? And if that is true, why do real conservatives keep voting for them like idiots?
GFR7
New member
Except I'm not wrong. It arose from liberal, progressive, postmodern ideology.
It came from the GOP and is the fault of the GOP.
Any thinking person will agree.
The odds are high in a postmodern world. Because they're morons.
shagster01
New member
So you essentially blame the originator and not the people that go on to enable it and write it into law.
Conservatives are an accessory in this crime, my friend.
That is not why you wear that label ...
GFR7
New member
They are the secondary, but not the primary, cause.
GFR7
New member
Yes, it is.
What do you mean by there being a negative culture about consent?
Okay, there is that whole Patriarchy group on facebook that you participate in and borrow from.
Not to mention the way you trivialize the act of rape by taking focus off of the predator in favor of blaming the victim ...
GFR7
New member
I have a right to hold certain beliefs, and I neither trivialize or blame the victim. Your interpretation is all afoul.
You have more in common with aCW than you think (rigid and judgmental thinking).
No one stated otherwise. You do realize that the *right to believe* does not equal "the right to not be criticized" ... right?
Except for the fact that I am not the only one who has that interpretation.
That must be why I spend 95% of my time on this threads ... oh wait .... that would be you.
BTW, you are projecting.
GFR7
New member
Duh, no, I din know dat. :dizzy:
Many people can be wrong.Except for the fact that I am not the only one who has that interpretation.
You're the one who fed into his massive, twisted ego at my expense. :carryon:
:rotfl: That really shows you have no idea what you are talking about.
I noted the differences between the two of you in the way only an objective viewer could.
Quetzal
New member
They can, but it certainly shouldn't be blindly dismissed. I am not saying you are sexist, but some of the posts you made on this thread were.
GFR7
New member
:rotfl: :rotfl: Talking about how "sincere" he is, the very thing he is always trying to con people into believing.
Wrong. Believing he is more sincere than you is not proclaiming him a wonderful person. What makes you worse if that you are passive-aggressive and almost all of your threads focus (negatively on gays and women).