Feminist furious at funny kid video

[glassjester]

Hmm, a bit like the bizarre notion that folk can train themselves to enjoy Beyonce songs then?

lain:

My claim was (and is) that you are the author of your own musical tastes - that your own choices shape your taste in music.

Do you really want to bring this up again?

 

[Lon]

Perhaps it's not an all or nothing issue.

Some probably choose homosexuality as a rebellious lifestyle, a mere sexually experimental/anti-establishment phase in their lives. Others, due to sexual trauma....while some are simply born to it... obvious in their manner and actions.

All of them I know, have been abused. Stats are 97% of them have been, most of them sexually, prior. It is VERY high, even if even 10% of them weren't.

Honestly, we didn't and don't care and are calling that normal. "Well, they were audacious enough to parade." That doesn't change facts. It is unconscionable to portray that to children. The Horn was correct, it is as bad as putting murder in a Disney movie. We just don't expect such mature content for Children. We don't appreciate teaching kids to cuss in a Disney movie either. We come to expect Disney to be aimed a G subject matter.

Though who cares about the distinctions other than those self-righteous types who need to point fingers in a pious effort to elevate their own self-worth and/or disguise insecurities.4th

:nono: It is merely a warning: Don't go see this if you deem inappropriate material unfit for children's view. I do, so will not be supporting Disney whenever they choose this. It is as much about being a consumer, as being a Christian. I think even you would say 'rightfully so.' -Lon

 

[ok doser]

Hmm, a bit like the bizarre notion that folk can train themselves to enjoy Beyonce songs then?

lain:

artie?


http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...y-defensible&p=4955926&viewfull=1#post4955926

 

[Right Divider]

Perhaps it's not an all or nothing issue.

Some probably choose homosexuality as a rebellious lifestyle, a mere sexually experimental/anti-establishment phase in their lives. Others, due to sexual trauma....while some are simply born to it... obvious in their manner and actions.

Though who cares about the distinctions other than those self-righteous types who need to point fingers in a pious effort to elevate their own self-worth and/or disguise insecurities.4th

Again, nonsense.

 

[quip]

All of them I know, have been abused. Stats are 97% of them have been, most of them sexually, prior. It is VERY high, even if even 10% of them weren't.

Your "evidence" is merely anecdotal and circumstantial. There is simply no evidence that sexual abuse plays any major role in homosexuality. Link

Honestly, we didn't and don't care and are calling that normal. "Well, they were audacious enough to parade." That doesn't change facts. It is unconscionable to portray that to children. The Horn was correct, it is as bad as putting murder in a Disney movie. We just don't expect such mature content for Children. We don't appreciate teaching kids to cuss in a Disney movie either. We come to expect Disney to be aimed a G subject matter.


:nono: It is merely a warning: Don't go see this if you deem inappropriate material unfit for children's view. I do, so will not be supporting Disney whenever they choose this. It is as much about being a consumer, as being a Christian. I think even you would say 'rightfully so.' -Lon

The implications go much further than Disney movies.

 

[quip]

Again, nonsense.

Any supporting evidence..or just biased declaration?

 

[Right Divider]

Your "evidence" is merely anecdotal and circumstantial.

Perhaps it's not an all or nothing issue.

Some probably choose homosexuality as a rebellious lifestyle, a mere sexually experimental/anti-establishment phase in their lives. Others, due to sexual trauma....while some are simply born to it... obvious in their manner and actions.

Though who cares about the distinctions other than those self-righteous types who need to point fingers in a pious effort to elevate their own self-worth and/or disguise insecurities.4th

You're really one to teach about "evidence". :rotfl:

 

[Right Divider]

Any supporting evidence..or just biased declaration?

YOU made the claim. YOU need to provide EVIDENCE.

 

[quip]

You're really one to teach about "evidence". :rotfl:

Then I'll take the former as mere declaration.

 

[quip]

YOU made the claim. YOU need to provide EVIDENCE.

I've no such burden. It's a non issue to me whether homosexuality is innate or chosen. The haters are the ones drawing distinctions...so bone up on the evidence.

 

[Right Divider]

Then I'll take the former as mere declaration.

Like this:

Perhaps it's not an all or nothing issue.

Some probably choose homosexuality as a rebellious lifestyle, a mere sexually experimental/anti-establishment phase in their lives. Others, due to sexual trauma....while some are simply born to it... obvious in their manner and actions.

Though who cares about the distinctions other than those self-righteous types who need to point fingers in a pious effort to elevate their own self-worth and/or disguise insecurities.4th

You make a BOGUS claim WITHOUT evidence and then cry foul. You're a classic example of a HYPOCRITE!

 

[Right Divider]

I've no such burden. It's a non issue to me whether homosexuality is innate or chosen. The haters are the ones drawing distinctions...so bone up on the evidence.

You made a claim about something WITHOUT evidence and you complain about others doing the same.

 

[quip]

You made a claim about something WITHOUT evidence and you complain about others doing the same.

Reread my post full of "perhaps" and "possible".

You don't have evidence...because there is none. So keep your rants to a minimum.

 

[ok doser]

It's a non issue to me whether homosexuality is innate or chosen.

regardless of "orientation" engaging in homosexual activity is a choice


as is the choice to engage in any other form of sexual perversion

 

[quip]

regardless of "orientation" engaging in homosexual activity is a choice


as is the choice to engage in any other form of sexual perversion

Sure, I choose my right hand to do lots of things. Yet i didn't choose right-handedness. At least I don't remember doing so.

 

[Lon]

Your "evidence" is merely anecdotal and circumstantial. There is simply no evidence that sexual abuse plays any major role in homosexuality. Link

I don't believe it. I just read a couple of .gov reports from the US and Canadian census. Can anybody debunk those? :idunno:

The implications go much further than Disney movies.

Thus this thread and back on topic :up:

 

[quip]

I don't believe it. I just read a couple of .gov reports from the US and Canadian census. Can anybody debunk those? :idunno:

Then it seems you're confusing correlation with cause.

 

[ok doser]

Then it seems you're confusing correlation with cause.

wait


you think that because they're homosexual they get abused more? :freak:

 

[quip]

wait


you think that because they're homosexual they get abused more? :freak:

No. Where'd you dredge that gem from? :chuckle:

 

[ok doser]

then you think a 97% correlation is purely random? :freak::freak: