there are so many layers within all the labels. for quick reference we tend to categorize and generalize. not me though, just everybody else
Okay, let's really look at it:
You'd said:
I responded: We self identify through broad labels often enough (Baptist, Hindu, Atheist, conservative, etc.) without that complaint attaching.
Most people identify themselves with fairly broad labels. So the we is most people. Christian is fairly broad. Conservative too, by way of example.
Your results
Personality: INTP
Variant: Turbulent
Role: Analyst
51% Introverted
55% Intuitive
64% Thinking
87% Prospecting
25% Turbulent
We differ then, to some extent. I think that labels are helpful, provided we recognize what they can't tell us about others and use them as general indicators subject to clarification that comes through experience and the particular hash outs that will happen in the exchange of ideas among people inclined to it.Yes, I know, and I think the reason we do it is intellectual laziness and I think this gets worse as time goes on. As we move from reading books to reading articles to reading posts our attention span as it concerns getting to know others has followed suit I fear and I don't see this as progress.
We differ then, to some extent. I think that labels are helpful, provided we recognize what they can't tell us about others and use them as general indicators subject to clarification that comes through experience and the particular hash outs that will happen in the exchange of ideas among people inclined to it.
INFP, but I'm better at it than the two above me. I say that because I think such personality tests are hokum.
I tested as INFP too.I'm INFP, too
I find it fascinating. INFP fits me so well, as does Highly Sensitive Person or High Sensory Processing Sensitivity.
Told ya I was weird :chuckle:
I tested as INFP too.
Except usually these tests are taken by people wanting to know themselves better. They're not for identifying traits in others so much as ourselves.
It's interesting how people can live their whole lives and not know themselves at all.
In an odd way, the opposite of narcissism isn't a positive, it's another negative - Too much navel-gazing vs. not even being able to find the navel.
Yes, I know, and I think the reason we do it is intellectual laziness and I think this gets worse as time goes on. As we move from reading books to reading articles to reading posts our attention span as it concerns getting to know others has followed suit I fear and I don't see this as progress.
It's the old problem. The unexamined life against the life overly scrutinized, after a fashion. Neither allows for much living.
I think part of why people like to put others into categories or boxes is because humans need a point of reference with which to understand something; something familiar that we can measure it by.
Or something....
So for me I'm a solid/pure on really everything but the feeling/thinking, where my 29% F is likely subject to a situational appraoch?Extroverted perceives the possibilities who then act with contemplative compassion.
Type topology
We may say type topology leads to conclusions about personality traits, that would be most true with pure types.
To be a pure type you have to have a preference over 66% on the time, and it should be fairly consistent over time.
Seems closer. I'm terribly sentimental, but rarely ruled by emotions when I'm thinking my way to a conclusion...though how I voice one can often be mitigated by my appreciation for someone. There are, after all, a number of ways to skin a...n animal. See what I mean?yes, it would indicate you might consider feeling and values in making logical decisions.