Ironic that Stipe is calling people morons, and then conflates "evolutionist" and "atheist."
Dumber than a ditch catfish, he is.
Dumber than a ditch catfish, he is.
People believe everything the scientist tells them...they used to teach the earth is flat.
I don't believe in the theory of evolution either but "People are fish" are you kidding me? That's not how the theory goes. And there's not "mountains of physical evidence against evolution". At least not yet. If anything there's mountains of physical evidence FOR it.
It's not 'total ignorance' to point out that the stringent peer review process would eliminate any 'theory' that simply didn't hold up to scrutiny.
Brainless, do you know what you're saying, 'cause I don't? Are you saying that it's the job of peer reviewers to automatically reject anything that doesn't fall within the generally accepted model? Or, are you saying that it's the job of peer reviewers to scrutinize the particular theories put forth within papers and then reject those papers of the reviewer doesn't think the paper has proven its theory?
People believe everything the scientist tells them...they used to teach the earth is flat.
Man's WHOLE history is just few feet under our towns and cities in layers back to the stone age...solid hard evidence in the form of bones and stone implements. They have drilled miles beneath this hard evidence and found nowt, BILLIONS of dollars they spend.
They also have PROOF that the population of earth has increased and spread out from a central point...there were only 5 million Britons in the 16th century now there are 70 millions...at the time of the Norman conquest it was less than a million.
Evolutionists are like detectives who find a body with a knife in it's back and a pool of blood but search the whole world looking for possible causes of death.
I don't believe in the theory of evolution either but "People are fish" are you kidding me? That's not how the theory goes. And there's not "mountains of physical evidence against evolution". At least not yet. If anything there's mountains of physical evidence FOR it.
Evolution vs God | |
Some folk still believe the earth is flat, there's even a forum for them: http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/
If evolution is so "incorrect" and the age of the earth is apparently only 6,000 - 10,000 years old then why is there no consensus among the scientific community on it? Why is creationism not taken even remotely seriously?
Banana Man? You are kidding, right?
What? When do you think scientists taught that the Earth was flat?
Some folk still believe the earth is flat, there's even a forum for them: http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/
They'd probably think you and Stipe are morons for not 'realizing' it apparently is...though what would you suppose their claims have to do with actual science?
Evolution and an old earth aren't the 'enemy' to anything apart from a rigid unthinking dogmatic belief system.
Who would 'they' be?Sure they did go read the history books, they used to burn folk at the stake if they stepped out of line...
For example? I have spent some time arguing with YECs elsewhere who argue precisely the opposite....the bible always did say the earth turns on it's circuits.
Citation?These days Nasa is telling folks that their underarm sprays are what causes the violent weather patterns we see.
So what are NASA doing, then?Yes that came from Nasa, they wouldn't want you to think anything THEY are doing is destroying the ozone. Man there are trillions of dollars at stake.
What makes you think they 'are the wisest people on the planet'?Such stupidity...these are the wisest people on the planet. God help us.
Well, that's funny because I live near to a number of Magdalen Culture sites (la Grotte de Niaux, for example) that date back at least 50% longer than that.Can't you deny that the hard evidence for man's whole history is there under our feet in solid bone?...it goes no further than 8, thousand years and probably less.
What do you mean by 'a single parentage'?Can't you deny that population and movement of people strongly support a single parentage?
Er, no, it wasn't (and isn't).This is scientific evidence, if you deny it you have to go into speculation which is exactly what evolution theory always was.
Simply reasserting your claim without the requested citation does not make it any more substantive than it was before. NASA's 2013 budget is about one-third what the US spends on pets every year. Just think how many more problems could be solved by getting rid of pets.Nasa are doing two things 1st they have been burning holes in the ozone for decades while blaming us for using underarm sprays...people are so gullible they believe everything the scientists say. 2nd they are burning trillions of dollars worth of honest hard working American's taxes. Cancel Nasa and cancel America's debt...at a stroke.
Well, I've just referred you to some that have been:There has never been any human remains dated beyond 10, 000 years old...
Um, the last time I checked out the palaeontology section of a natural history museum, this evidence was pretty much a central feature of its displays. How are your 'evolutionists' pretending it 'doesn't exist'?...there are plenty there, all in layers under our feet, every generation that ever lived, every age of man. It's all there compadre. How he has progressed is all there in hard solid form from stone age to the present day. It is this rock solid evidence which even schoolboys know about that the evolutionis must pretend doesn't exist.
Do you have a relevant citation?Single parentage is easily discovered because that is what the hard solid evidence shows...waal ok not single parentage per se but look here.
The population on every continent and in every nation shows the expansion of mankind from a central location. Everyone agrees upon that though they might disagree where that location is.
Maybe logical, but wholly wrong: populations evolve, not individuals.Britain today has a population of 70 millions, 500 years ago it was 5 millions 1,000 years ago 1 million so by reversing the evidence you can discern how the human race has multiplied from a tiny number and spread out throughout the earth. It is perfectly logical to think that this tiny number is two or a single parentage.
But there is evidence for evolution. Consider, for example, this site:Sure evolution is speculation, anything without scientific evidence is speculation.
But there is evidence for evolution. Consider, for example, this site:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/search/topicbrowse2.php?topic_id=46