End of Roe Vs Wade?

The Phoenix

BANNED
Banned
The degree of stupid of the leftist has been stripped bare and exposed to view like never before:

So now they are okay with horse medicine if it makes them able to kill children.

The madness to which evil drives people is frightening and amazing.

End of the Holocaust
God sent Donald Trump to save the children.
He put three judges on the court, and we can thank him for saving lives.
Donald Trump is the greatest American in history. He brought to a close the most evil, sick, satanic chapter in American history, the LEGAL slaughter
of millions of innocent helpless childrens lives.

Now the sick, demonic forces of the Left will do all they can to keep being able to murder children, but I believe this is a turning point in history


Had to repeat that
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
When I mentioned ivermectin to my lefty sister when my mother had covid, she sneeringly referred to it as horse medicine.
You should tell her that it won the Nobel prize for use in humans.

I should try asking about this one.
Good luck
 

The Phoenix

BANNED
Banned
711683c1638a309e.png
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Apart from the leak itself, all of this is consonant with just normal electioneering. There's a reason there are only two parties of any importance here, and being at the ready with fund raising and campaign narratives at the drop of a hat is part of that. They know how to win and how to keep winning, none of the other parties do, because they aren't all ready at the drop of a hat to launch fund raising and platform narrative roll-outs, in part.

Electioneering is not a conspiracy, with the proviso that neither party openly advertises that they're basically solely in the electioneering business, full stop. Apart from that (which is just a trade secret that both parties have every right to protect), there is no conspiracy. Dems want to win. Repubs want to win. They are actually working hard to do it though, where every other party here is just reclining and hoping that one day the dream candidate will, against their own best interest, choose to identify as one of the third parties. That will just never happen, which is why there are only two parties that win here, in part. Because Repubs and Dems both work very hard and unendingly to win the next elections. Promising candidates think, "Yeah, I want to win, that sounds good," and go with one of the two big parties. Mr. Ron Paul did this in 2008.

Electioneering. Like mountaineering, or engineering, or profiteering, it's the profession that knows all about (winning) elections.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
BREITBART

Nolte: Left’s Lunatic Embrace of Infanticide Helped Kill Roe v. Wade​

Marlowe Obst, 11, speaks during a protest outside of the U.S. Courthouse in response to leaked draft of the Supreme Court's opinion to overturn Roe v. Wade, in Los Angeles, Tuesday, May 3, 2022.

If the obscenity that is Roe v. Wade is overturned, you can blame Democrats for two reasons. The first is that for 50 years — despite countless opportunities — Democrats did nothing legislatively to legalize abortion. (Why would they when solving the issue would dry up fundraising and ginning up the base?) Secondly, rather than agree to limits on abortion, limits a vast majority of Americans see as reasonable, Democrats instead demanded the legal right to commit straight-up infanticide.

Back in the 1990s, abortion was nowhere near as controversial as it is today. Why? Because former President Bill Clinton and the Democrat party pushed the idea of abortion being “safe, rare, and legal.” Now, that was not my opinion of abortion at the time, nor is it my opinion today. I want all abortions outlawed — and I am allowed to say that because, as I write this, I’m identifying as a woman — a black woman, actually; a lesbian black woman with a harelip.

Where was I?
So, despite my own beliefs on the issue, a wide swath of America was pretty comfortable with the abortion issue.
We had a national consensus around “safe, rare, and legal.”

Then we didn’t…
Most civilized countries place limits on abortion, anywhere from 12 to 20 weeks. This is why in most civilized countries, abortion is not a galvanizing issue. Most people agree abortion should be legal, most people agree that there must be time limits, and the abortion laws reflect that consensus.

The same is true with Americans. Regardless of my own opinion of the atrocity of abortion, there’s no question that 1) a majority of the public want abortion to remain legal and 2) an even bigger majority want limits placed on abortion.

But Democrats don’t want limits on abortion, and by “Democrats,” I mean Democrat politicians because a whole lot of everyday Democrats do want limits.
The problem is that the Democrat party is now fully owned by its extremists, and so we now have a Democrat party that went from “safe, rare, and legal” to “give-birth-to-a-healthy-baby-and-let-it-die-of-exposure.” That’s not an exaggeration. Who said the following? Was it Herman Goering or former Gov. Ralph Northam (D-VA)?

When we talk about third-trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of obviously the mother, with the consent of the physician—more than one physician, by the way—and it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities. There may be a fetus that’s non-viable. … If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.
Even Bill Clinton was eventually pushed into openly championing the outright horror that is partial-birth abortion, a procedure that is exactly what it sounds like: slaughtering a living baby that can live outside the womb after it’s been born.
Partial birth abortion is infanticide.
But it wasn’t just the fact that Democrats began to openly demand legalized infanticide, there was also the matter of their rhetoric.

No sane person, no decent person, not even someone who is pro-abortion, sees abortion as anything other than an unfortunate event. And that’s how Democrats and their corporate media allies used to discuss abortion, as an unfortunate but sometimes necessary thing. Their tone around abortion was solemn and thoughtful; this was not something to be taken lightly.

The only way to describe the left’s tone around abortion today is demonic.
What was solemn has become strident and boastful. What was not taken lightly is now championedincluding the harvesting of dead baby organs. The murder of the unborn is now outright celebrated and cheered. It is beyond grotesque, and how can any person of good conscience sit back and allow such evil against helpless innocence to carry the day?

 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Biden goes off script, forgets to call the baby a clump of cells, refers to "aborting a child"


 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond


the left is willing to destroy every institution of American civic life to preserve their abortion regime. The day after the leak, the president of the United States, a man who once pushed for a constitutional amendment to overturn Roe but has since surrendered to the demands of his party’s ascendent left wing, took the extraordinary step of weighing in on an undecided Supreme Court case. (While he was at it, he spouted exactly the kind of nonsense we have come to expect from him.)
 
Top