Embracing the Gospel Alone as Your Only Means of Salvation

[aikido7]

The "Kingdom Gospel" is not the same Gospel that Paul preached.

The Gospel that Paul preached is the Gospel that justifies the ungodly, Romans 4:5 and reconciles us and the world unto God, 2 Corinthians 5:18, 19.

Jesus did not preach that Gospel. He left it up to the apostles.

Every one of the world’s faiths changed or added to the original vision of their founders.

This is the way of all worldly things. It’s all about interpretations of human beings of the inspired interpretations of the biblical authors.

 

[Bright Raven]

Did you actually expect a rebuttal from a sola scriptura Protestant website? :kookoo: :rotfl:

If you disagree with my source, feel free to actually disprove the information provided in Post #91 above. Give it a try.


If it were actually taught in the New Testament, and weren't a directly self-refuting proposition, I would be more than happy to embrace sola scriptura (again). As it stands, no one in the first fifteen centuries of Christian history believed or taught any such notion, nor is it taught anywhere in the Bible itself. (See Post #91 above.)



Gaudium de veritate,

Cruciform
+T+

I expected maybe something from you. well, nuff said about that.

 

[aikido7]

Many scholars already know that the people represented in the New Testament didn’t consider themselves Christians.

But instead of static theological interpretations about Jesus or God, the early Christian writings can teach us a number of creative and improvised ways of trying to make sense of who one is, where one belongs, and what God means in the face of loss.

 

[brewmama]

It is a verse that embraces Sola Scriptura which is unacceptable to the Catholic Church.

How do you POSSIBLY get that interpretation from that verse? It never ever ever ever says SOLA.

 

[brewmama]

The teaching I adhere to comes straight out of scripture;

2 Timothy 3:16 King James Version (KJV)

16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

And you do know that the "scriptures" referred to there are just the OT?
So to be the literalist that you are, you should only use the OT.
Especially since the NT came from that despised, evil CHURCH.

 

[Cruciform]

I expected maybe something from you.

...and you received precisely that in Post #93 above. Also, your inability to actually disprove the content of Post #91 is noted; thus, my statements stand exactly as posted.



Gaudium de veritate,

Cruciform
+T+

 

[beloved57]

All that you want to do on this Forum is to harass Christians, that is your objective.

Knight should give you the boot.

A Christian is one that believes the Gospel of Gods Grace in Christ, which you do not!

 

[Robert Pate]

A Christian is one that believes the Gospel of Gods Grace in Christ, which you do not!

A Christian is one that is trusting in Christ alone for their salvation. This leaves you and John Calvin out.

 

[chrysostom]

can we trust in pate?

 

[Robert Pate]

can we trust in pate?

No, but you can trust in the Bible that I frequently quote, that reveals we are justified by faith without works, Romans 4:5.

 

[beloved57]

No, but you can trust in the Bible that I frequently quote, that reveals we are justified by faith without works, Romans 4:5.

You dont believe that scripture, you teach that a person is Justifed by his work, by something he must do. You call it Rom 10:13, thats a work !

 

[aikido7]

The "Kingdom Gospel" is not the same Gospel that Paul preached.

The Gospel that Paul preached is the Gospel that justifies the ungodly, Romans 4:5 and reconciles us and the world unto God, 2 Corinthians 5:18, 19.

Jesus did not preach that Gospel. He left it up to the apostles.

That is the result of the fact that Paul’s theology was an interpretation of the meaning of Jesus’s death.

First came Jesus, then came the man-made theologies and meanings that were attached to him after his death.

 

[chrysostom]

No, but you can trust in the Bible that I frequently quote, that reveals we are justified by faith without works, Romans 4:5.

pate tells us what the bible says
that
makes him a religion
pate's interpretation of the bible is wrong
that
makes pate a false religion

 

[Ben Masada]

can we trust in pate?

Absolutely not!

 

[Ben Masada]

Many scholars already know that the people represented in the New Testament didn’t consider themselves Christians.

But instead of static theological interpretations about Jesus or God, the early Christian writings can teach us a number of creative and improvised ways of trying to make sense of who one is, where one belongs, and what God means in the face of loss.

True but, only after Acts 11:26. That's when Paul founded Christianity in Antioch and his followers started being called Christians for the first time.

 

[Robert Pate]

pate tells us what the bible says
that
makes him a religion
pate's interpretation of the bible is wrong
that
makes pate a false religion

The "Historical Gospel" of Jesus Christ calls your Catholic religion into question.

My interpretations are right. Whats wrong is your Catholic religion.

The Gospel justifies the ungodly, Romans 4:5 and reconciles the world unto God, 2 Corinthians 5:19.

What does your Catholic religion do? Besides deceiving millions.

 

[Robert Pate]

Absolutely not!

The law will not save you.

What the law will do is condemn you to hell, Romans 3:20.

 

[beloved57]

The law will not save you.

What the law will do is condemn you to hell, Romans 3:20.

You teach salvation by work's of the law too!

 

[Robert Pate]

You teach salvation by work's of the law too!

Your a liar and your father is the author of all lies.

 

[beloved57]

Your a liar and your father is the author of all lies.

Thats you, and a false accuser !