Drug Dealing and the Bible

[Nazaroo]

Scores rescued from Mexican drug gang

Mexican President Felipe Calderon's has led an aggressive army-led crackdown on drug cartels [Reuters]

Mexico's military has freed 61 men being held captive and
forced to work for a drug gang in a violent northern border city.

The army said on Sunday that the men were found in a safe house in Piedras Negras on Saturday.

Soldiers made the discovery during a security sweep in the area that also turned up an abandoned truck filled with 6 tons of marijuana.

A statement said one of the captive men is from Honduras, while the others are from various parts of Mexico.

Piedras Negras sits across the border from Eagle Pass, Texas, in the Mexican state of Coahuila, which has been the scene of ongoing battles between drug gangs.

Last week the army arrested a major figure from the Zetas drug cartel there.

The rescue mission comes a day after more violence hit Mexican prisons.

Twenty prisoners died and 12 others were injured on Saturday in a prison on the Mexican-US border town of Matamoros, after a dispute between two inmates turned into a melee that lasted almost three hours.
President criticises opposition
Meanwhile, Felipe Calderon, the Mexican president, said on Sunday that politicians in the main opposition party may consider deals with criminals, opening an inflammatory new front in the nation's presidential election campaign.

Calderon's blunt remarks about the centrist Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which is favored to win the July 1, 2012 election, are unusual in a country where the president is expected to stay largely aloof from party politics.

Centering on the policy that has dominated his presidency - an aggressive army-led crackdown on drug cartels -
his comments risk polarizing opinion on how to restore stability to
Mexico, where the drug war has killed 44,000 in five years.

Leading members of Calderon's conservative National Action Party (PAN), other PRI opponents and political
analysts have accused the once-dominant party of making secret deals with drug cartels in the past to keep the peace in Mexico.

In a weekend New York Times interview published a day after he said a state governed by the PRI had been left in the hands of a drug gang, Calderon was asked whether the opposition party might pursue a corrupt relationship with organized crime.

"There are many in the PRI who think the deals of the past would work now. I don't see what deal could be done, but that is the mentality many of them have," Calderon, whom the law prevents from seeking a second six-year term, said.

Analysts say Calderon is bitterly opposed to the PRI, which dominated Mexico for seven decades until the PAN won the presidency in 2000 under its candidate Vicente Fox.

The tide of drug war killings has eroded support for the PAN, and the PRI's main hopeful, Enrique Pena Nieto, is said to have around twice the support of his nearest rival.

 

[Nazaroo]

Try to understand the implications and reasoning.

(1) The European 'Church' fell into deep corruption many hundreds of years before the Reformation.

(2) This 'Church' adopted drug dealing as a main industry, namely alcohol manufacture and sales.

(3) The Inquisition is one of many evidences of this same corruption, and the real cost of such a horrific compromise. Violence follows drug dealing like wet follows water.

(4) The Church of England was simply Roman Catholic until at least 1500.

(5) The C of E fluttered and stumbled between 'Catholic' and 'Protestant' for another 300 years, all the while continuing to deal drugs and promote alcoholism.

(6) The Church of England remained essentially "Catholic" until it finally collapsed into total apostacy in the late 1800s, with half the priests defecting to Roman Catholicism, and the other half continuing to deal drugs independently as apostate 'Protestant' agnostics, deists, mystics, anti-supernaturalists, and atheists.

(7) It was at this time and in this state, that the universities Cambridge and Oxford, main suppliers of priests and religious clerics, were completely overrun by homosexual alcoholics and other drug dealers, communists, witches, Romanists, etc.

(8) Although there was a 'temperance' movement, it was clumsy and ineffective in England, worthless in Ireland and Scotland, and only temporarily effective in North America, due to an accidental alignment of interests with money-grubbing capitalist barons.

(9) As a result, the exponentially increasing 'drug combine', mostly run by international merchants and European bankers and freemasons, bloated into a Multi-Billion dollar industry, along with the prostitution/porn trade, and Arms dealing.

(10) This three-fold satanic Trinity of Guns, Drugs, and Prostitution represents most of the world economy.

This historical synopsis explains quite clearly why many Anglican priests are really witches, satanists, drug dealers, child molestors, and homosexual arms dealers who serve the God of War.

God will destroy it all soon.

 

[jeremysdemo]

so your saying God is a drug manufacturer?

Was it not him who said,

Genesis 1:29
And God said, Behold, I have given you every plant bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, which has seed in its fruit; to you it shall be for food.

that is illegal to do BTW here in the God bless America....when it comes to Marijuana, tho God declared it good and told us it shall be for food, staunch conservative not jobs like you made it illegal and classified it a "drug" (so drug dealers can make money off it and kill people over it) with no evidence of it having addictive properties or ill effects on the body no less.

Can't you see you are just perpetuating the stereotype that keeps what God made and called food illegal and keeps the killings over it going on?

There's really no reason for people whom enjoy what God made for food to be demonized (that they need to repent or some other hogwash), for his herb He gave for food to be criminalized or for drug dealers to make millions off selling it and kill innocent people in the process, all that is happening because of backward demonically induced thinking like this thread is full of, instead of having a staple Americas grasslands can produce that is cheaper and better than cotton in so many ways, produces legal jobs, taxes and revenue for America we have our current situation and more propaganda from those whom stand to loose the most (the cotton industry) and drug cartels all agree with Nazzoo that this is a dangerous and bad thing God made for us to consume and it needs to remain illegal so more drug cartels can make money and more people can die in the crossfire.



keep shinin

jerm

 

[Sum1sGruj]

Bible does not ban alcohol or drugs. The Bible warns of the trouble that can come with them. This is where proselytizers go drastically wrong. It i snot a sin to consume alcohol, it is a sin to be an alcoholic. It is not a sin to smoke marijuana, it is a sin to be a THC-saturated hippie. And so on. The message is clear. Drugs can lead to sin just as fried chicken can lead to gluttony, or provocative clothes can lead to adultery, and so on. The object of sin- some people should learn it.

 

[jeremysdemo]

Bible does not ban alcohol or drugs. The Bible warns of the trouble that can come with them. This is where proselytizers go drastically wrong. It i snot a sin to consume alcohol, it is a sin to be an alcoholic. It is not a sin to smoke marijuana, it is a sin to be a THC-saturated hippie. And so on. The message is clear. Drugs can lead to sin just as fried chicken can lead to gluttony, or provocative clothes can lead to adultery, and so on. The object of sin- some people should learn it.

unfortunately when you live in a country who's legislative branch is controlled by the religious right (and a bunch of money grubbing lobbies) you don't have that liberty to legally consume any erb God made (I'm talking eating for food like the scripture says not being some pot smoking hippy).

Nazaroo and his ilk are the types responsible for this type of social Unholy injustice, their inability to recognize the subtle differences has put America where it is now with the "Drug War" so the blood is on their hands.

keep shinin

jerm

 

[Gerald]

God will destroy it all soon.

Just think of the few, the precious, precious few, who won't be flung into the Lake of Fire when it's all over, and how you'll be among them.

It'll be like being a member of Noah's family right after they exited the Ark.

 

[Nazaroo]

Just think of the few, the precious, precious few, who won't be flung into the Lake of Fire when it's all over, and how you'll be among them.

It'll be like being a member of Noah's family right after they exited the Ark.

You seem obsessed with this issue.

But what is wrong with God destroying a large number of sinful persons?
They would surely have destroyed each other and themselves anyway.

When they build a building, they put up a lot of scaffolding.
But when the building is finished, they take down all the scaffolding.
It has served its purpose and is now of no value whatever.
Now the real building inside the scaffolding is revealed.

So it is with the Kingdom of God:
It has a messy and misleading appearance while under construction.
But when the chaff is burned away, the golden glory of the divine architecture is revealed.

Why should you be surprised, that the purpose of some people, perhaps even you,
is to be a mere 'foil' or necessary evil, so that what is everlasting and permanent can be completed?
Even worthless atheists have a temporary purpose in God's plan;
to train the true children of God in the way they should grow.
When the final creation is cast, the mold is cast away.

 

[Nazaroo]

so your saying God is a drug manufacturer?

Was it not him who said,

Genesis 1:29
And God said, Behold, I have given you every plant bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, which has seed in its fruit; to you it shall be for food.

that is illegal to do BTW here in the God bless America....when it comes to Marijuana, tho God declared it good and told us it shall be for food, staunch conservative not jobs like you made it illegal and classified it a "drug" (so drug dealers can make money off it and kill people over it) with no evidence of it having addictive properties or ill effects on the body no less.

Can't you see you are just perpetuating the stereotype that keeps what God made and called food illegal and keeps the killings over it going on?

There's really no reason for people whom enjoy what God made for food to be demonized (that they need to repent or some other hogwash), for his herb He gave for food to be criminalized or for drug dealers to make millions off selling it and kill innocent people in the process, all that is happening because of backward demonically induced thinking like this thread is full of, instead of having a staple Americas grasslands can produce that is cheaper and better than cotton in so many ways, produces legal jobs, taxes and revenue for America we have our current situation and more propaganda from those whom stand to loose the most (the cotton industry) and drug cartels all agree with Nazzoo that this is a dangerous and bad thing God made for us to consume and it needs to remain illegal so more drug cartels can make money and more people can die in the crossfire.



keep shinin

jerm

Your illogic is stunning and frightening.

You obviously want to legalize marijuana.
Whereas I couldn't care less about the legalization of marijuana.
You are obsessed, and imagine that everyone is your enemy,
in a conspiracy against the wonderful marijuana plant.
This is a sign of someone who smokes pot. They suffer paranoid delusions.

I am most assuredly against the enslavement and violence caused by hard drugs.
And the most harmful drug right now in terms of sheer numbers of victims,
is ALCOHOL.

But unlike you in your adolescent fantasy,
I don't believe that making drugs "illegal" has caused organized crime.
You are using the same illogic here that pacifists use against guns:
"Guns kill people, not criminals. Guns make people into criminals."
But this is just nonsense. Making guns illegal doesn't protect honest citizens.
Criminals get guns anyway, because guns continue to be manufactured for profit.
Disarming citizens however, and preventing them from arming themselves,
has a devastating effect on crime: it allows criminals free reign.

Laws against drug dealing do not cause criminal gangs,
any more than guns make people murderers.

People were committing crimes like murder and war for 6,000 years
before guns were invented. They killed with spears, arrows, swords, stones.

People were enslaving one another with drugs for profit long before Jesus' time.

Drugs were used to commit crimes like abortion, in 200 A.D.

There were no 'laws against drugs and drug dealing' for some 5,000 years.
But that did not create a peaceful society, nor did it prevent drug dealers,
and criminal organizations from exploiting the vulnerable.

Your argument for 'legalization' is just nonsense.
It won't create a 'peaceful world', nor will it end the profiteering of criminal organizations.

Criminal organizations flourished far more rapidly AFTER prohibition ended.
Without Prohibition, we now have more criminal gangs than ever.

Mankind is on a path of corruption and destruction,
and the only hope is Christianity.
And you can be sure that the only survivors will be Christians.

Getting rid of drug laws won't rid America of criminal gangs,
anymore than getting rid of prostitution laws will get rid of prostitution,
and the negative social and medical impact that prostitution has on society and community.

Get your head out of the sand, and out of the clouds.

You are in the middle of a war for the heart and soul of mankind.
Your enemy isn't drug laws;
Your real enemy is the ideology that recreational drug abuse is somehow safe and healthy.
That is the biggest myth of the 20th century.

 

[Nazaroo]

Bible does not ban alcohol or drugs. The Bible warns of the trouble that can come with them. This is where proselytizers go drastically wrong.

Why are you people such retards?

The issue is not the vague term "drugs".
Nor do statements like that above help solve the real problems of community caused by recreational drug abuse.

Instead of using the new knowledge that God has provided,
you seem to wish to return to days of ignorance.

Today we know alot more about both food and drugs,
and non-drugs and industrial solvents like ethyl alcohol.

Today we know that medically, biologically, and scientifically,
a true food supplies nutrients, and when consumed releases energy,
which becomes available for the body. A NON-food, by contrast,
destroys nutrients, depletes minerals and other resources, and
has a net COST in energy, energy that the body must expend to
break down, remove, and excrete it from the body.

Alcohol is NOT a food: it is an industrial solvent, one of many examples
of a class of CHEMICALS called alcohols, which are not foods, and
which cannot be consumed and converted into either useful building-blocks,
or used as a fuel by the human body to generate energy.

There are likewise many chemicals in the world, both natural and synthetic,
which are NOT FOODS, NOT nutritious, NOT healthy to consume,
and which, like ALCOHOL, are in both small and large quantities POISONS.

Poisons are chemicals which have no positive effects,
but only negative effects such as the destruction of tissue,
the interference with natural bodily processes, and
the loss of energy.

Alcohol is a POISON: in ANY quantity, because it is a harmful solvent.
Small amounts do small damage, and large amounts do large damage.
There is no amount of alcohol which is beneficial to an organism.

At their very best, alcohols can be used to clean the skin or wounds,
and they do this by dissolving harmful substances and KILLING other organisms which could be harmful.

It i snot a sin to consume alcohol, it is a sin to be an alcoholic. It is not a sin to smoke marijuana, it is a sin to be a THC-saturated hippie. And so on.

Again, here the logic is false.

Imagine if we used the same logic for fornication.

When the Bible says some 20 times, AVOID FORNICATION,
by your logic it means "have sex moderately. Engage in safe sex."
Sex outside of Scriptural bounds isn't bad;
the real issue is moderation.

But the issue isn't moderation at all.
An occasional drinker is a drug user,
just as an occasional adulterer is an adulterer.

An occasional gambler is a gambler.
This is because the mindset is sinful in itself.
An occasional gambler believes in chance, not God, or he wouldn't gamble at all.

An occasional adulterer has no respect for the Ten Commandments,
any more than a frequent adulterer has.

When Paul and the NT say "BE SOBER!" some 30 times,
These flakey interpreters would interpret Paul to mean:
"Drink moderately."

Why shouldn't we do the same with every other piece of advice?
"Be Chaste!" means have free uncommitted sex in moderation.
"Flee Idolatry!" means worship God on Sunday but eat and drink with your party-animal friends at the Hari Krishna temple during the week.

The word of God no longer has any authority or even significance, because
the behavior of the new 'tolerant Christian' is no different from any other sinner.

The message is clear. Drugs can lead to sin just as fried chicken can lead to gluttony, or provocative clothes can lead to adultery, and so on.

The message is garbled and leads into further darkness.
Recreational drugs cannot be compared to foods,
Because recreational drugs are harmful, and unnecessary,
while foods are beneficial and necessary.

Only an idiot would confuse the two.

 

[Gerald]

You seem obsessed with this issue.

Nope, I just like to point out the elephant in the room.

The fact that the volume of chaff is always vastly greater than the volume of wheat is something a lot of Christians would rather not think about.

Salvation is the exception, not the rule. Are we clear on that? By definition, the majority are not exceptional; if they were they wouldn't be the majority.

 

[some other dude]

.... is NOT a food: it is an industrial solvent, ....which are not foods, and
which cannot be consumed and converted into either useful building-blocks,
or used as a fuel by the human body to generate energy.

You just described water.

 

[Nazaroo]

You just described water.

Alcohol has one other property - its not essential to life.
That distinguishes them fundamentally.

The fact that alcohol is also a poison, while water is not, is another distinction.

 

[some other dude]

Alcohol has one other property - its not essential to life.

Neither is roast beef. :idunno:

The fact that alcohol is also a poison, while water is not, is another distinction.

Nonsense. Ethanol is not a poison, if taken in small quantities.

Water is indeed a poison, if taken in large quantities. It can send you into hyponatremic shock.

 

[jeremysdemo]

Your illogic is stunning and frightening.

You obviously want to legalize marijuana.
Whereas I couldn't care less about the legalization of marijuana.

which is revealing the beginning of your problem, if you are not involved or could care less about the laws of your own country and whether or not they are just according the scripture than you really shouldn't complain about the consequences of a such a law (eg, making criminals of otherwise law abiding people, gangs that thrive off of the profits, etc etc)

You are obsessed, and imagine that everyone is your enemy,
in a conspiracy against the wonderful marijuana plant.
This is a sign of someone who smokes pot. They suffer paranoid delusions.

actually it is a sign of a person who understands his own responsibility to not only know the Bible but to also know when society creates an atmosphere that is not allowing people to live righteous lives, the criminalization of Marijuana puts young adults in prison (whether they use it to smoke or not, simple possession of it) which then opens up their life to a world of other activity that actually is unrighteous according to the scripture (eg, stealing, homosexuality, etc etc)
We get it Naz, you could care less and anyone who does must be because they are paranoid and delusional.....:rotfl:

I am most assuredly against the enslavement and violence caused by hard drugs.
And the most harmful drug right now in terms of sheer numbers of victims,
is ALCOHOL.

But unlike you in your adolescent fantasy,
I don't believe that making drugs "illegal" has caused organized crime.

no it's just given them another product to make money off, money that could be being taxed and go toward all manner of beneficial things (eg. rehabs, schools,bridges ) I see you seem to just detach yourself from the reality of the drug war and the simple statistics of revenue lost in the last 70 years, not to mention the millions of lives that have been adversely effected by incarceration for something God said was food.

You are using the same illogic here that pacifists use against guns:
"Guns kill people, not criminals. Guns make people into criminals."
But this is just nonsense. Making guns illegal doesn't protect honest citizens.
Criminals get guns anyway, because guns continue to be manufactured for profit.
Disarming citizens however, and preventing them from arming themselves,
has a devastating effect on crime: it allows criminals free reign.

you just proved my point quite eloquently, just take the word Marijuana and substitute it in the places "guns" is in the above statements.

Laws against drug dealing do not cause criminal gangs,
any more than guns make people murderers.

again, detachment, laws (especially ones that make plants illegal) directly contribute to the finances of gangs, most people join a gang to make easy money, so again this revenue is directly related to the cause of gangs and there growth.

People were committing crimes like murder and war for 6,000 years
before guns were invented. They killed with spears, arrows, swords, stones.

we are talking about two different things, crimes (eg, sin, murder, theft etc etc) and consuming plants, the two aren't related unless you live in a society that has unjust and unholy laws then the two become directly joined by association.

People were enslaving one another with drugs for profit long before Jesus' time.

Drugs were used to commit crimes like abortion, in 200 A.D.

There were no 'laws against drugs and drug dealing' for some 5,000 years.
But that did not create a peaceful society, nor did it prevent drug dealers,
and criminal organizations from exploiting the vulnerable.

So you are confirming your belief that God is a drug manufacture?
you are classifying something God made and said to take for food as a drug? because that is the context of the post you are responding to, simple yes or no Naz.

Your argument for 'legalization' is just nonsense.
It won't create a 'peaceful world', nor will it end the profiteering of criminal organizations.

who said anything about a peaceful world, oh wait you did, anyway either it is a holy and just law or it isn't, the fact that it isn't is evident by the results it produces (eg. incarceration of innocent people, loss of revenue etc etc)

Criminal organizations flourished far more rapidly AFTER prohibition ended.
Without Prohibition, we now have more criminal gangs than ever.

are you talking about alcohol again? what criminal organization has flourish so much when Alcohol became legal? (were they the same ones that were making millions off of it being illegal?)

Mankind is on a path of corruption and destruction,

that is because they don't follow the Bible and purposefully write laws that prevent others from doing so as well, mostly people like you are involved in the propaganda that helps those laws get passed.

Getting rid of drug laws won't rid America of criminal gangs,
anymore than getting rid of prostitution laws will get rid of prostitution,
and the negative social and medical impact that prostitution has on society and community.

what exactly are gangs going to buy sell and trade for the type of profit they are making now off of Marijuana?

Get your head out of the sand, and out of the clouds.

You are in the middle of a war for the heart and soul of mankind.
Your enemy isn't drug laws;
Your real enemy is the ideology that recreational drug abuse is somehow safe and healthy.
That is the biggest myth of the 20th century.

my enemy is ignorant people like you, it's the very reason why we have the laws we have and why people are being forced into a penal system for doing nothing unrighteous according to Gods word, their souls never had a chance thanks to strict self righteous conservatist having such a heavy influence on legislation and steering it away from the righteous word of God, and then theirs those that just "could care less"...they have their part too.

keep shinin

jerm

 

[jeremysdemo]

let's just cut to the chase here Naz,

ignoring the illegality of marijuana and the result that has on a society for a second.

God created marijuana, he also said quiet clearly that every plant bearing seed was for us to eat.

So are you blaming God for the first person who walked up to the plant and ate it?
and the second who took some back to his village and sold it to others (now he's a "drug dealer") who needs to repent of that and the guy that ate it according to Gods instruction needs to repent too.

What in your "righteous" eyes makes this plant a drug?

maybe if we understood that we would understand your logic.

Drugs in my definition have adverse effects on the mind and body, they cause illness and addiction, where as plants God made for us to eat are beneficial to both the mind and body.

keep shinin

jerm

 

[Nazaroo]

let's just cut to the chase here Naz,

ignoring the illegality of marijuana and the result that has on a society for a second.

God created marijuana, he also said quiet clearly that every plant bearing seed was for us to eat.

Here is your first major FAIL, where you fall flat on your face,
and your entire argument is revealed as obvious nonsense.

God created Deadly Nightshade. Its a seed-bearing plant.
According to your interpretation of Genesis,
God said quite clearly that every seed-bearing plant was for us to eat.

Eating Deadly Nightshade results in death.
According to your interpretation of Genesis, God is a trecherous, murdering jerk.

I would agree with you that the "hero" who first consumed marijuana and got stoned,
may have thought he had the 'right' to eat anything he wanted.
But he was just an ignorant fool,
either because he did not have the sense NOT to eat anything he wanted,
or else because like you he ignorantly believed that God said he could do so.

But this would be the very same case,
if our "hero" was the first to consume Deadly Nightshade.
He may have thought he had the 'right' to eat anything he wanted.
But he was just an ignorant fool,
either because he did not have the sense NOT to eat anything he wanted,
or else because like you he ignorantly believed that God said he could.

But others, more intelligent than the first man to eat Deadly Nightshade,
quickly figured out after a few experiments with animals,
that eating Deadly Nightshade was fatal, and also foolish.

Thus men accumulated knowledge about botany and biology
which extends far beyond the vague and short statement in Genesis.
We now catalog a list of poisonous plants some 100's of species long,
which directly contradicts your private interpretation of Genesis.

Grow up, and stop rejecting knowledge in favor of self-serving,
and ignorantly false interpretations of Genesis.

Its not about marijuana.
Its about your dangerously stupid interpretation of the Bible.

So are you blaming God for the first person who walked up to the plant and ate it?
and the second who took some back to his village and sold it to others
(now he's a "drug dealer") who needs to repent of that
and the guy that ate it according to Gods instruction needs to repent too.

No. I'm not blaming God for the fact that an idiot can misinterpret
a bad translation of the text.
But I am most certainly blaming you for perpetuating a bad interpretation,
which can result in death.

What in your "righteous" eyes makes this plant a drug?

maybe if we understood that we would understand your logic.

Simple: Medical and biological knowledge classifies some plants,
or rather their active components, as drugs.

You can understand my logic, if you understand modern science.

Drugs in my definition have adverse effects on the mind and body,
they cause illness and addiction, where as plants God made for us to eat
are beneficial to both the mind and body.

Here your stupidity is most clear:

You began by saying that ALL seed-bearing plants were allowed by God for food.
Now you have decided to distinguish between plants that are beneficial,
and those that have adverse effects.

In essence, you are making a distinction between plants when it suits you,
which is not supported by your own interpretation of Genesis.

You began by saying that ALL seed-bearing herbs were given by God for food.
That was your justification for the consumption of marijuana.
You have ended by saying now only that those "plants that God made for us to eat" are good for food (i.e., not all plants).

The distinction found in Holy Scripture was "seed-bearing".
But that distinction does not separate poisonous plants from plants safe to eat for food.

Since God's distinction does not protect us from food-poisoning,
your argument that God's distinction here gives blank permission to eat any seed-bearing plant is false.

You have misinterpreted God's word to allow you to consume marijuana.

The real interpretation must be something else;
God's word here only gives a general indication of man's diet: that is, grains and fruit.
It does not give any advice here at all for how to avoid dangerous or poisonous plants.

Not only is your interpretation of Holy Scripture faulty,
but your application of exceptions is arbitrary and personal.

You obviously should not instruct others.
Bible exegesis should be public and verifiable by science,
not private, idiosyncratic, and favoring one's own filthy pleasures.

 

[jeremysdemo]

just answer the question, you have not proven marijuana to be unsafe for the human body in any capacity other than your spoon fed cotton industry diatribe that illegalized it in the first place,(not any legitimate scientific research which actually shows quiet the opposite) so everything you are saying is based on that ignorance.

thankfully your ilk will die out soon and we have the benefit of being governed by more educated groups.

I don't know about anyone else but for me that day can't come soon enough.

keep shinin

jerm

 

[JonahofAkron]

I suppose 'fleeing from the appearance of evil' isn't going to dissuade you?

 

[JonahofAkron]

just answer the question, you have not proven marijuana to be unsafe for the human body in any capacity other than your spoon fed cotton industry diatribe that illegalized it in the first place,(not any legitimate scientific research which actually shows quiet the opposite) so everything you are saying is based on that ignorance.

thankfully your ilk will die out soon and we have the benefit of being governed by more educated groups.

I don't know about anyone else but for me that day can't come soon enough.

keep shinin

jerm

Do you eat marijuana?

 

[Paulos]

Here is your first major FAIL, where you fall flat on your face,
and your entire argument is revealed as obvious nonsense.

God created Deadly Nightshade. Its a seed-bearing plant.
According to your interpretation of Genesis,
God said quite clearly that every seed-bearing plant was for us to eat.

Eating Deadly Nightshade results in death.
According to your interpretation of Genesis, God is a trecherous, murdering jerk.

Deadly nightshade does provide us with some medicinal benefits. For example:

Dangers and Benefits of Belladonna, the Deadly Nightshade