annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Trolling... :chuckle: It's called having a discussion with rocketman, not you - and if he decides he's not up for it then he can go back to ignoring me again.
Donald Trump will WIN BIG!
- Thread starter THall
- Start date
Trolling... :chuckle: It's called having a discussion with rocketman, not you - and if he decides he's not up for it then he can go back to ignoring me again.
The point is that the Bible's attitude is against feminist ideology- these nations being patriarchal really just twists the blade.
You can't justify a cause that calls for the same exact things that the Bible is against.
Just a tad ... :chuckle:
Not any more understated than a leveling thread titled: "Hillary... American liberal's acceptance & love affair with lawlessness" :think:
I don't believe the Bible is interested in liberal or conservative politics entirely. Only in as much as they serve the good.
I don't know why you believe that. Once upon a time most, nearly all of early societies were.
The Bible isn't an enemy of feminism. It's the enemy of your perception of it...and of certain corners, which is true of nearly any ideology under the sun. Or, see my first answer above.
Paul was anti-feminist. So was St. Augustine. In fact, there's a lot of liberal historians today who like to slander them as 'hating women'.
And yet, they are two of the most pronounced edifiers in history.
Exactly. That's why it matters. If the people closest to him can't trust him, neither can we.
Hello Mr. Journey, its always good to read your posts
That may be true, but that doesn't mean that Trump will have my vote.
In fact, they do have a choice. They can either vote for him or not vote for him.
It looks like there isn't anything they can do to stop Trump. This doesn't mean that they have to support Trump.
Yes, they can refuse to support the nominee. They can do this by stating that they refuse to support the nominee.
I agree. Trump will only ever adopt Trump's agenda, which is "Trump wants to be the president."
Yes, possibly. I would call that "protesting the nomination of a man who is unfit to be president of the US."
I don't think anyone has claimed that they are able to reject Trump as the presumptive nominee at this point.
They know this, but they do not have to like it. And they are not required to support Trump.
And Jefferson owned people. I'm kidding (but not about Jefferson). Paul wasn't anti-feminist. He'd be anti some ideas within that tent, which is why I noted in my last that overly broad approaches are problematic. All feminists don't believe the same thing/define feminism in exactly the same way. Essentially, feminism was a politicization of the belief that women were entitled to the same protections and legal rights as men. Not all feminism is of the same particular, however, which is why Sarah Palin was comfortable calling herself a feminist.
And a lot of people who don't understand Paul attempting to paint him in misogynistic tones, both left and right. People.
So was Jefferson.
Where there's Trump there's bull!
He does seem to be pretty hard on China too.They do, just not about the apparent nominee. They can by and large hold Trump in check as the legislative body. I suspect that's why he's meeting with Ryan. Else, he could be a conservative version of Carter, who rode the anti-establishment wave right up onto the beach and stayed there.
Of course, Trump has to win another bid first and it's far from settled that he can manage it without a great many people compromising prior principles...which to be honest appears to be happening. :think:
Putting the two side by side I will pick the far less scary monster... The one that is not a felon .
You mean loyal like keeping government classified material unprotected? Which is a felony...You mean that kind of loyalty? If the only judgement you have over the man is his personal marital failings maybe you should vote for the female misogynist and complicit accomplice to female sexual abuse Hillary. I guess your alright with the lawlessness and moral depravity she is walking in... And if you are not every other liberal in the country that is voting for her is. Hillary makes Trump look like a choir boy in comparison...your grievance with Trump is very single focused and not even remotely even handed when looking at Hillary Clinton with the same standard.
What do you think about Trump's taxes ?
"Trump’s abrupt dismissal of his own tax plan, which he regularly cited on the campaign trail, came a day after he signaled a possible willingness to raise the federal minimum wage, which would be a major reversal from his stance in the primaries."
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/donald-trump-flip-flops-taxes-wages-he-turns-focus-general-election
You need to know that Trump has only one thing that he is sure about. The fact that he wants to be the president.
Trump is like every other progressive, and I belive if he is elected all his sicophant fans will find out in short order that he is a liberal at heart. Yes, I will vote for the man but, it is more a vote against the felon Hillary than an endorsement of Trump.
Exactly
Exactly!
That's what I was going to say.....and did.
TFTn5280
New member
This'll get me a shot of Southern Comfort I'm sure (or maybe just shot), but I'm gonna call it like I see it. Ted Cruz would be the presumptive Republican nominee right now, with likely the 1237 needed delegates to win this thing, if he had won the one area of this country that he was considered a shoe-in to win: that being the Bible-believing South. Going into the South he supposedly had a firewall set in place, much like Hillary's hold on the same region. In the South, Hillary had the blacks she could count on come hell or high water to vote her way, and Cruz was supposed to have the same with Evangelicals, himself being a firebrand Pentecostal homeboy. What happened? Well the blacks came through for Hillary (Think where she'd be today if they hadn't) but the entire South voted for Trump. A minor two-day waffle while Trump got himself "educated" on the horrors of Duke and the KKK, before his eventual denouncement of same, was all he needed to secure every state south of the Mason-Dixon line and east of Texas. To a cowboy in the West, this is how it looks. The South ~ King James in one hand, Confederate flag waving with the other ~ said which am I most willing to lay down that I might stretch out my hand and pull the lever come Super Tuesday? The answer came through loud and strong. Throughout the Bible-belt the flag flew high and proud. State after state that was supposed to be Cruz's went to Trump. Give those states to the guy with the firewall going into them and this whole thing looks a lot differently. Trump is no more KKK than than Jesse Jackson, and the South is not going to rise again, but for a long weekend leading into Super Tuesday, Trump whistled Dixie and in droves those really dependable Evangelicals said in their hearts, I'll vote my conscience next time: This one's for Dixie.
Bottoms up?
Bottoms up?