Right Divider
Body part
Neither? So you admit that YEC isn't science? We're making progress!
Don't get childish and dishonest. You don't have observations to support your beloved "big bang".... but you still call it "science".
Neither? So you admit that YEC isn't science? We're making progress!
You don't have observations to support your beloved "big bang".... but you still call it "science".
Actually, we do have observational evidence for the Big Bang theory:
The earliest and most direct observational evidence of the validity of the theory are the expansion of the universe according to Hubble's law (as indicated by the redshifts of galaxies), discovery and measurement of the cosmic microwave background and the relative abundances of light elements produced by BBN. More recent evidence includes observations of galaxy formation and evolution, and the distribution of large-scale cosmic structures,[72] These are sometimes called the "four pillars" of the Big Bang theory.[73] -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Ba...ional_evidence
"Big bang" is science. It's the best science we have at the present time to explain the data. But like all science, it is subject to change when presented with new information. It isn't "doctrine" or "dogma."
It's funny that you do not understand the highly speculative nature of those "observations".
https://kgov.com/evidence-against-the-big-bang
How would the Creator create a huge universe with distance stars and light without some "appearance of age"?
The "scientific establishment" is well aware of the problems.Creationists do a fine job of sitting on the sidelines and throwing mud at the scientific establishment.
:rotfl:But shouldn't they should try to do something constructive for a change? Try expanding the boundaries of scientific knowledge, rather than shrinking it.
Such childishness.So you agree that the solar system has the appearance of ~4.5 billion years of age, and the universe has the appearance of ~13.8 billion years of age? Great, we're making progress!
The "scientific establishment" is well aware of the problems.
Such childishness.
Why don't you try to answer the question?
How would the Creator create a huge universe with distance stars and light without some "appearance of age"?
Of course the scientific establishment is well aware of the problems in cosmology. In fact, YECs wouldn't even know anything about the problems in cosmology if the atheistic darwinialistical evolutionalists hadn't told us all about it.
How much "appearance of age" do you estimate the Creator created the solar system and the universe with?
How would the Creator create a huge universe with distance stars and light without some "appearance of age"?
Just try to answer the question.
Begging the question is not an answer.I'm trying to agree with you, but you don't seem to want to let me. The answer is obvious: The Creator DID create the universe with distant stars and light with "appearance of age." Specifically, He created the solar system with the appearance of ~4.5 billion years of age, and he created the universe with the appearance of ~13.8 billion years of age.
I just answered the question. How do you respond?
Begging the question is not an answer.
I'm not "begging the question," I'm begging you for an answer to the question, How much "appearance of age" do you estimate the Creator created the solar system and the universe with?
I'll wait for you to actually address the question.
I did address your question. I answered it in full. But you seem keen to avoid the question I asked you: How much "appearance of age" do you estimate the Creator created the solar system and the universe with? Why is that?
Here it is again for reference: How would the Creator create a huge universe with distance stars and light without some "appearance of age"?
Begging the question.... again.He wouldn't.
No, it's not.It's an inherent contradiction to say so.
Adam would appear to us to be "aged" and YET he was not... see the point yet?How could God create Adam without an "appearance of age?'' If God created Adam as a full-grown, adult male of say, 25 years of age, then Adam's "appearance of age" at the time he was created was "apparently" ~25 years.