Creationists admit "We are losing badly"

Stuu

New member
No, the comedy is all the mental gymnastics that have been done to deny that the material as we see has been through huge contortions and disturbances. When tons of material from New England ends up in Grand Canyon, when the whole center of Australia is determined to be rapid deposit sentiment, it is clear that our Maker was breaking open the fountains of the deep on a scale that sunk and raised whole plates at a time, that there was both massive amounts of water and magma sloshing around everywhere. Catastrophic and quick plate tectonics is what Genesis is referring to and is the geologic story as well.
It's a shame then that the fossils say otherwise.

Stuart
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
It's a shame then that the fossils say otherwise.

Stuart

They don't. Marine fossils are found inland on every continent and high elevation. A. Mayor THE FIRST FOSSIL HUNTERS, as a secular source. Grand Canyon has places where 275M years of layers are 'missing.' Everest has a yellow band that is sediment that should be elsewhere.

And it is not just fossils either. There are human artefacts such as mayan items that have been found in Thailand and Australian sediment, in slurry.

Someone would have to explain or concoct a conspiracy theory to show why about 500 flood accounts or legends exist universally, not as fantasy literature, but as sane explanations as to why the surface of the earth is the way it is today. The west coast Klamath never mention seeing the ocean until after the great flood; then they mention that it is visible from (Mt shasta). Ie, explanations of drastic changes in the world are found or shown in all these materials.
 

Stuu

New member
They don't. Marine fossils are found inland on every continent and high elevation. A. Mayor THE FIRST FOSSIL HUNTERS, as a secular source.
That's because many places on most continents used to be the seabed. You don't say whether they are all the same fossil species or not. Clue: they are different depending on when the continent was under the sea.

Grand Canyon has places where 275M years of layers are 'missing.'
What the hell does that mean??

Everest has a yellow band that is sediment that should be elsewhere.
Hilarious! And where does Ken Ham or Henry Morris or any of the others of that shower of liars think the yellow band should be?

And it is not just fossils either.
But that was my point.

So I will delete the rest of your mini Gish Gallop.

Stuart
 

Greg Jennings

New member
No, the comedy is all the mental gymnastics that have been done to deny that the material as we see has been through huge contortions and disturbances. When tons of material from New England ends up in Grand Canyon, when the whole center of Australia is determined to be rapid deposit sentiment, it is clear that our Maker was breaking open the fountains of the deep on a scale that sunk and raised whole plates at a time, that there was both massive amounts of water and magma sloshing around everywhere. Catastrophic and quick plate tectonics is what Genesis is referring to and is the geologic story as well.

:chuckle:

And where, pray, are these fountains located?
 

gcthomas

New member
The west coast Klamath never mention seeing the ocean until after the great flood; then they mention that it is visible from (Mt shasta).
How come the Klamath lands weren't flooded during the Flood, and the Klamath don't have a worldwide flood myth?
 
Top