I think you are confusing a few things. Evidence from science supports the creationist model. Rapid speciation is possible because of info that already exists in the genome. For example here is an article about stickleback fish that speciated in just a few generations.alwight said:Well, you told me previously that a sorry genetic decline (fall) was the reason for humanity's non-perfect construction, as I recall, right?
Now when it suits you want to claim that despite this genetic deterioration new species can spring up everywhere apparently at the drop of a hat, equipped with functioning genes and traits for whatever comes along. That would seem to suggest a surprisingly intact if not perfect gene-pool indeed, ...or do I mean an impossibly intact and prepared gene-pool?
Does it make you feel better that ALL of you are ganging up on one poster? gcthomas, hedshaker, stuu, noguru, alwight, jukia, all against 6days? What are the odds? Ridiculous!!
MichaelC
Chicken embryos can be induced to produce teeth by turning on ancient genes, too. Conceivably, a new bird species with teeth could emerge if the environment and ecosystem provided the selection pressure needed to regulate those teeth genes back into use.I think you are confusing a few things. Evidence from science supports the creationist model. Rapid speciation is possible because of info that already exists in the genome. For example here is an article about stickleback fish that speciated in just a few generations.
http://www.nature.com/news/stickleback-genomes-reveal-path-of-evolution-1.10392
*
Maybe you should tell that to 6days, who has just been telling us that natural selection is part of the creationist model.God helped the creatures to adapt as necessary as He saw fit. HE DID IT. Not natural selection.
Haha... thanks Michael, but its not a problem. Their worldview is being challenged so they are trying to defend their beliefs.
"God saw everything He had made and called it VERY good"MichaelCadry said:God created everything and He saw that it was Good (Not Necessarily Perfect...
I think you would agree that God created the processes necessary for animals to survive in our fallen world. In the post flood world, animals would have had to adapt quickly to changing environments.MichaelCadry said:God helped the creatures to adapt as necessary as He saw fit. HE DID IT. Not natural selection. He's the creator and can change things in all of us as He sees fit.
The book of Genesis tells us that there was no other 'race' before Adam. Believing there were people before Adam, or that people were on other planets, seems destroys the Gospel .message.MichaelCadry said:Perhaps He got fed up with one race of men and women warring all the time and destroyed them all, and started over with a new Adam. It says that right in the book of Genesis...
Its OK...I have not always been yec either. But --- you should consider it. Jesus is a YEC! He did tell us that Adam and Eve existed at the beginning of creation.MichaelCadry said:BTW, I am not a YEC!
There is plenty of evidence that speciation is occurring all the time, e.g. Google "Ring Species", but typically in the lifetime of humans it is not observable. YECs have recently tried to force-fit a kind of "super-evolution" as their model not because the evidence suggests it, it doesn't, but because they must make the typically gradual process of speciation upon speciation fit somehow into a ludicrously short span of time, else they will have to reject the whole idea of evolution again.I think you are confusing a few things. Evidence from science supports the creationist model. Rapid speciation is possible because of info that already exists in the genome. For example here is an article about stickleback fish that speciated in just a few generations.Well, you told me previously that a sorry genetic decline (fall) was the reason for humanity's non-perfect construction, as I recall, right?
Now when it suits you want to claim that despite this genetic deterioration new species can spring up everywhere apparently at the drop of a hat, equipped with functioning genes and traits for whatever comes along. That would seem to suggest a surprisingly intact if not perfect gene-pool indeed, ...or do I mean an impossibly intact and prepared gene-pool?
http://www.nature.com/news/stickleback-genomes-reveal-path-of-evolution-1.10392
*
And yet it is a fact of natural history that there never was a time when only two humans existed.The book of Genesis tells us that there was no other 'race' before Adam. Believing there were people before Adam, or that people were on other planets, seems destroys the Gospel .message.
Yes....and?Stu said:Chicken embryos can be induced to produce teeth by turning on ancient genes, too. Conceivably, a new bird species with teeth could emerge if the environment and ecosystem provided the selection pressure needed to regulate those teeth genes back into use.
Michael: So he decided and managed the extincition of some species of plant and animal? Just on a whim?
And if his control is so great, why cancer? why dementia?
"God saw everything He had made and called it VERY good"
Michael... why would God create something less than perfect?
No.So... chickens may be derived from a bird that had teeth, correct?
Dear 6days,
God created Lucifer and Satan, and they are not perfect. It does not say that "God looked and saw that everything that He had made was perfect." It is written in Genesis 1:31, "And God saw everything that He had made and behold, it was 'very good.'" Not perfect. Very few things are perfect.
May God Bless You For Your Good Mind And Heart!!
Michael
Hello Hedshaker,
Wherever have you been? In lots of trouble, I suppose. Good to hear from you again, unless you're going to say something I don't agree with!! ROTFL!!
God Turn You Around,l
Not from what I can see.but in the second chapter, it says the Lord God FORMED the birds/fowl from the dust of the ground.