So why did you ask it here then?
Stuart
Glad to see that you found what you were looking for.I used to believe in evolution. I thought the idea of evolution was extremely interesting. So I started reading a lot about evolution. That's when it fell apart. The more I looked for proof, the more I saw there was no proof. There are poor excuses for evidence, and tons of examples of lies and frauds, some still being taught as fact long after they were discovered to be frauds
I think you are beating a dead horse Mark. The Bible does not use the word species. The word is fairly flexible with no exact definition that is accepted by all. Animals can change and rapidly adapt to various environments. I would say they can speciate, but they can't change into a different kind...finches change but remain finches.... salamanders may adapt to the point some say they have speciated, but they still are the same kind of animal. Same with dogs / wolves as you mention.She also Believes that Wolves are a Separate Species from Dog.
The ancestors of finches were dinosaurs....finches change but remain finches....
The ancestors of finches were dinosaurs.
Stuart
You would both be wrong if you believed that.I would say that we Both Agree, that Animals can Mutate, and some mutations that are Random, can work out for the Better for the Creature in the Long Run
No.So you think that Dinosaurs Turned into Birds, and that's Why they are no Longer Here?
=M=
No.
Stuart
Eye evolution?? haha... Evolutionists can't provide even one clear example of mutations causing a gain of information, or creating a new gene. Yet they believe extreme sophistication / specified complexity (our eyes)Six Days;
I would say that we Both Agree, that Animals can Mutate, and some mutations that are Random, can work out for the Better for the Creature in the Long Run, but that is not any reason that the Eye would Just happen.
You would both be wrong if you believed that.
And that is because you didn't read properly when it was pointed out to you that evolution works on whole populations, not on individuals.
Stuart
Eye evolution?? haha... Evolutionists can't even one clear example of mutations causing a gain of information, or creating a new gene. Yet they believe extreme sophistication / specified complexity (our eyes)
were created by mutations. Eye evolution is blind faith. Science suggests optimal designs are created.
Sure, and Trex evolved into a chicken I suppose... Imagine those drumsticks!:carryon:The ancestors of finches were dinosaurs.
Stuart
Probably rapid climate change; possibly they were finished off by the meteorite that left the Chicxulub crater 65 million years ago.So how do you believe Dinos Were Destroyed?
Why should they have died out? Our mammalian ancestors survived, so why not birds?Why are there still Birds, but no Dinos, if Birds did come From Dinos, Shouldn't they have died With the Dinos?
You jest. But I don't think you are far off reality there.Sure, and Trex evolved into a chicken I suppose... Imagine those drumsticks!:carryon:
or creating a new gene.
Yet they believe extreme sophistication / specified complexity (our eyes)
Eye evolution is blind faith.
Science suggests optimal designs are created.
Can you give me an example of a line of descent in which we could try it out to see if the 'original species' can reproduce with the modern species? Homo sapiens with homo erectus? Oh dear, there aren't any more homo erectus. Modern horses with pliohippus? Hmm, no pliohippus left.If it Works on Multiple ones, where is Your Modern Animal that is a Direct Observation of True Speciation, which can No Longer Reproduce with it's Original Species it came From?
=M=