Cosby Is a Serial Rapist

Granite

New member
Hall of Fame
Regardless of whether or not he is convicted of a crime or faces punitive damages ... one thing has changed. His reputation is now toast ... which, considering his admission to the crime, it should be.

Yeah, there's no coming back from this. First or second paragraph of his obituary, for sure.
 

musterion

Well-known member
Surprised. Disappointed. Disgusted.

His admittance to giving women Quaaludes (which he stocked up on) is an extremely convincing piece of evidence that he denied them of the ability to consent.

Not quite...not if they took them knowingly and willingly, as many people (male and female) did in the '70s where Cosby's sexual mindset appears to have been stuck. If you're slipped a Mickey, you're not responsible. If you consent to taking something that you know is going to put you offline, you're consenting to whatever comes during your blackout.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Not quite...not if they took them knowingly and willingly, as many people (male and female) did in the '70s where Cosby's sexual mindset appears to have been stuck. If you're slipped a Mickey, you're not responsible. If you consent to taking something that you know is going to put you offline, you're consenting to whatever comes during your blackout.

exactly

and it's going to be impossible to prove deception

a classic case of he said/she said
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
wiki sez you're a retard:


Main article: History of the United States Republican Party

Founded in the Northern states in 1854 by anti-slavery activists ...


MSNBC once did a story on George Wallace and his racism. They put an "R" next to his name, and said Wallace was a Republican.

TH lives in Alabama, you would think he knows Wallace was a Democrat.

BMknekACMAAJMU2.jpg:large
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
he hit stardom in the sixties, seventies and eighties

why should anybody be surprised that his world was awash in sex and drugs?
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
Perhaps we should wait for him to be actually tried before passing sentence? Strange thought I know.
Only a jury can pass a sentence and opinion is the meat of this market. So...does this mean you think O.J. didn't do it?



MSNBC once did a story on George Wallace and his racism. They put an "R" next to his name, and said Wallace was a Republican.

TH lives in Alabama, you would think he knows Wallace was a Democrat.
I not only do, I know that the Dixie democrats who resisted desegregation switched parties when the democrats became progressive. That's why the once solid party of the South is now something else.

wiki sez you're a retard:
Where with you it's mostly just the quality of your posts.
 
Last edited:

musterion

Well-known member
exactly

and it's going to be impossible to prove deception

a classic case of he said/she said

Yep. Can't roofie yourself (which is what willingly taking a lude amounts to) then blame someone for raping you while you're out. If he DID rape you while you're out, he should hang. But you made it happen.
 

Town Heretic

Out of Order
Hall of Fame
It means I believe he is innocent until proven guilty by a court of his peers.
Legally true, but this isn't a courtroom and no one's opinion is legally binding.

You didn't answer the question and the problem it presents. O.J. was determined to be innocent. Do you feel obligated to agree with the jury and proclaim his innocence?
 

kiwimacahau

Well-known member
The means we use to determine a person's innocence or guilt is the courtroom. If a jury finds, after considering the evidence, that a person is innocent / guilty then that decision is final pending appeals. We either agree that this is our mechanism for declaring innocence / guilt or we go back to lynchings and the voice of the mobs.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Legally true, but this isn't a courtroom and no one's opinion is legally binding.

You didn't answer the question and the problem it presents. O.J. was determined to be innocent. Do you feel obligated to agree with the jury and proclaim his innocence?

I see what you did there
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
The means we use to determine a person's innocence or guilt is the courtroom. If a jury finds, after considering the evidence, that a person is innocent / guilty then that decision is final pending appeals. We either agree that this is our mechanism for declaring innocence / guilt or we go back to lynchings and the voice of the mobs.

shirely we have more choices
 

Rusha

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Legally true, but this isn't a courtroom and no one's opinion is legally binding.

You didn't answer the question and the problem it presents. O.J. was determined to be innocent. Do you feel obligated to agree with the jury and proclaim his innocence?

OJ was a miscarriage of justice due the discretion of a biased jury.
 
Top