Common sense prevails, Trump bans transgenders from the military
- Thread starter jeffblue101
- Start date
Quote Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Does that answer your question for you?
When dealing with Trump supporters such as yourself, I have to remember what Senator Ted Cruz said during the primaries:
"Trump supporters are low information voters".
Since it was done for the wrong reasons, no, I'm not excited about the decision.
Does that answer your question for you?
When dealing with Trump supporters such as yourself, I have to remember what Senator Ted Cruz said during the primaries:
"Trump supporters are low information voters".
Since it was done for the wrong reasons, no, I'm not excited about the decision.
The strangest part about these trans people, if they are born male, they are straight and often been married, to women, of course, and they only like women, sexually. If they are female, they are almost always homosexual, and swldom been married, in fact, they are former lesbians.
Oh, sure, there are the few 'she-male hookers' in red-light districts, yet they are more like drag queens and would never like to join the military.
They are, not as a group, gay people' since only the females are gay.
Before you disagree, read the literature, female tyrannys are not considered gynephilic.
Oh, sure, there are the few 'she-male hookers' in red-light districts, yet they are more like drag queens and would never like to join the military.
They are, not as a group, gay people' since only the females are gay.
Before you disagree, read the literature, female tyrannys are not considered gynephilic.
I'm not sure where you get your information from, but I'll address this part of your post:
I highlighted the word "been" for a reason. Granted, I can't think of many women that would want to share their wardrobe with their husband, hence a good reason to divorce if he doesn't seek therapy.
That being said: I find it hard to believe that a man who is so psychologically imbalanced that he enjoys dressing in women's clothing or takes it a step further and has his genitals mutilated would have a normal sexual appetite.
Where do you get your information from?
I highlighted the word "been" for a reason. Granted, I can't think of many women that would want to share their wardrobe with their husband, hence a good reason to divorce if he doesn't seek therapy.
That being said: I find it hard to believe that a man who is so psychologically imbalanced that he enjoys dressing in women's clothing or takes it a step further and has his genitals mutilated would have a normal sexual appetite.
Where do you get your information from?
His character was faking it, just like all of the trannies and homos, hoping to get discharged.
Last edited:
aCW does not support banning transgenders from the US military, sad :nono:
How about we take this discussion where 200-300 people a day can view it?
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=5070938&viewfull=1#post5070938
Bring your multiple personalities along, I always enjoy your act.
This is not the way to go about this. LGBTQ is sin. It is wrong, on so many levels. And banning it in the military but not banning it elsewhere is the wrong approach. Like abortion criminalizing it in certain situations but not others is a failed strategy from the outset. Ban it outright, in all circumstances; no exceptions.
Another TOLer with limited knowledge of the real world, human nature and science.
Is this all you have or are you going to make a point?
Asking questions is not the same as making a point.
Things that are immoral and unethical should not be allowed to prevail. Banning them in one instance or circumstance does not affect the issue properly.
LGBTQ is, for lack f better terminology, mental illness. People attracted to their own gender, or believing themselves to be the wrong physical gender is clearly dysfunction. There's a reason the term "dysphoria" is used.
The point is this: banning homosexuality is ignorant. Homosexuality exists. A religious based ban will do nothing but drive homosexual behavior underground. Well, then perhaps you will not be personally offended walking down the street in any big city or in Provincetown for example, but your ban will do nothing positive.
It is ignorant and stupid.
And I'm sure you base your belief that it is a mental illness on years and years of study and research. Or not, because if that were true you would not make the statements you make on the topic.
glassjester
Well-known member
Reproduction is a basic biological need and function. It is to the species, what eating is to the individual. Of course reproduction is accomplished naturally through sex between a man and a woman. A man with an aversion to sex with a woman is akin to a man with an aversion to eating. It's a disorder.
glassjester
Well-known member
So you would prefer that transsexuals are allowed in the military?
I know homosexuality is not recognized by the psychiatric community as a mental illness, anymore. That doesn't mean it isn't.
But you can't even muster up a thought out and detailed argument for why I'm wrong. You say it's ignorant and stupid but you can't seem to tell me why. Or demonstrate it to be so.
By the way, I base my statements on years of observation. And common sense.
Tell me something: Why is homosexuality the only deviant [as in deviates from the typical] sexual attraction that is not classified as a disorder/illness?
Also, do you think banning it is the only thing I think should happen?
Another researcher into the human sexuality, no doubt.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
The point is this: banning pedophilia is ignorant. Pedophilia exists. A religious based ban will do nothing but drive pedophilic behavior underground.
Great argument Jonah! :thumb:
glassjester
Well-known member
You can't attack the argument, so you attack the man?
Come on, explain why I'm wrong.