Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Not really, why do you ask?
chrysostom’s 2013 annual awards
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
Not really, why do you ask?
zoo22
Well-known member
She's trying to beat Chrys out this year for the 2013 passive aggressive award.
And the winner of the 2013 semi-annual TOL Passive Aggressive Award is... Eeset.
Wow. That's a real upset.
Sorry Chrys. You put up a great fight, no one's passive aggressive like you, but I think this year you might have lost a bit of the passive.
zoo22
Well-known member
And the TOL Raging Cracker Award for the week goes to CatholicCrusader.
Exactly misleading and truncated.:yawn: All quotes on my site are exact.each:
From serpentdove's website post:
See, again, that makes it seem like I'm questioning her salvation instead of her practice. That's what she does. What I did was something different.
Here's what I actually wrote:
:think: Shouldn't Jabberin at least get a dishonorable mention?
The annual Chrysostom awards are usually quite controversial [political like, a bit like the Nobel peace award] but this year...well
I have no control over who comes here
so
we just have to deal with it
we are being tested
so
we just have to deal with it
we are being tested
I feel your pain
he should be recognized
zoo22
Well-known member
rainee
New member
First, thank you, TH, for taking down the pic of your eye peeping down and into the computer screen. Although I'm sure it was a nice eye
I immediately felt alarm like I felt at a similar shot of King Kong peeping in the Apt window, the T-Rex in Jurassic Park at the car window, remember? That really got me! And maybe one from Jack and the Giant Slayer...
Today I see you just need a shave, that's ok I guess. But it might make you feel better to get one. Does your gay barber do that for you?
Now Onward:
Wait I believe the thread was about how in three other threads, one being in religion, I could fish out at least one quote by you where you made a reference to hair.
That was it, Town, in a hutshell. From that point you had to take the tease or try to ward it off or whatever you wanted or others wanted..
Maybe it was funny on the level that one might not know what to make of it at first? But I grabbed those three comments of yours and set them out.
It was hilarious to me because it looked kind of odd and inexplicable and a bit bizarre (when really it wasn't - I guess?)
(And men who are not bald by a certain age perhaps should get teased by others? I had seen you and Tomo ribbing about the topic before then. )
It was your hair quote on a religious thread after you fussed at me and accused me wrongly that and got mad at me that got me thinking about it. I guess I do remember that.
And yes you did make some tongue in cheek remarks and made a good showing mostly.
Until something happened.
And a move of others to make the bizarre I had found look good or right started happening. (If I remember correctly.)
That was because a perversion was going on and nothing can fix that. I had to shut it down. Strange is always strange - one cannot make it normal - to try to make strange normal or right is a factor in what makes an abomination, right? Ok then.
So you see? I did not make myself mad as you try to claim, but I was angry.
And some people when they do not sound mad are too mad to say they are, they have to have action. Which is why I shut it down.
Men should be kind and make up with their wives when they get the silent treatment from them, I think, because sometimes we can't speak when we are really troubled..
No. The thread had a touch of the surreal because it was a bizarre topic with some room for wit and humor.. Recently I almost did a post on Zoo saying butthurt so many times after Res said it, but I couldn't do anything with it. However, for me it was becoming bizarrely funny.
I didn't want Zoo becoming fixated.
Now hold on - it is not always a quoting of you that is the answer.
You know how to use words.
What I have to do is try to keep you from saying white is something other than white and stuff like that.
Did you know preachers who use the word of God a lot can have it become almost meaningless to them - like a piece of wood?
Now behold your quote:
TH, what you meant when you said, " I have the sneaking suspicion that someone didn't get out of a thing what they'ed hoped..." is what is the insult to me. The implication inside your words is that I meant something negative and not good. Period. No wheedling out of that, TH, word master or not.
Insulting me now is unnecessary!
What are you doing?! Quit it!This why some may call you hurtful names in response, TH.
Town, I can work with words, quotes are not pesky to me. I don't have to be a word smith or master to be a word understanderer..uh.. hmm.
But then again I'm boring.
Really? I thought you rode Eeset like your favorite saddle pony
lol. Uuups. Sorry.
Well hello Mr It Is Not always Just About You, I told them nicely at the end that they were trying to make it look ok when it was by design a bizarre thing. What they were doing at the end was disgusting. THEN YOU opened a look alike thread and said I had wanted to hurt you! Very Wrong of you to think that over hair..
Hmm. Omitting smilies doesn't seem to leave a lot... I don't know what to say to that, hehehe
EXCEPT You obviously do not understand my intents!
I immediately felt alarm like I felt at a similar shot of King Kong peeping in the Apt window, the T-Rex in Jurassic Park at the car window, remember? That really got me! And maybe one from Jack and the Giant Slayer...
Today I see you just need a shave, that's ok I guess. But it might make you feel better to get one. Does your gay barber do that for you?
Now Onward:
Wait I believe the thread was about how in three other threads, one being in religion, I could fish out at least one quote by you where you made a reference to hair.
That was it, Town, in a hutshell. From that point you had to take the tease or try to ward it off or whatever you wanted or others wanted..
Maybe it was funny on the level that one might not know what to make of it at first? But I grabbed those three comments of yours and set them out.
It was hilarious to me because it looked kind of odd and inexplicable and a bit bizarre (when really it wasn't - I guess?)
(And men who are not bald by a certain age perhaps should get teased by others? I had seen you and Tomo ribbing about the topic before then. )
It was your hair quote on a religious thread after you fussed at me and accused me wrongly that and got mad at me that got me thinking about it. I guess I do remember that.
And yes you did make some tongue in cheek remarks and made a good showing mostly.
Until something happened.
And a move of others to make the bizarre I had found look good or right started happening. (If I remember correctly.)
That was because a perversion was going on and nothing can fix that. I had to shut it down. Strange is always strange - one cannot make it normal - to try to make strange normal or right is a factor in what makes an abomination, right? Ok then.
So you see? I did not make myself mad as you try to claim, but I was angry.
And some people when they do not sound mad are too mad to say they are, they have to have action. Which is why I shut it down.
Men should be kind and make up with their wives when they get the silent treatment from them, I think, because sometimes we can't speak when we are really troubled..
:nono:
No. The thread had a touch of the surreal because it was a bizarre topic with some room for wit and humor.. Recently I almost did a post on Zoo saying butthurt so many times after Res said it, but I couldn't do anything with it. However, for me it was becoming bizarrely funny.
I didn't want Zoo becoming fixated.
Quote me. The thing about people who want to fudge the truth that doesn't quite serve their purpose is that they never do get around to quotes...it's a theme.
Now hold on - it is not always a quoting of you that is the answer.
You know how to use words.
What I have to do is try to keep you from saying white is something other than white and stuff like that.
Did you know preachers who use the word of God a lot can have it become almost meaningless to them - like a piece of wood?
Now behold your quote:
TH, what you meant when you said, " I have the sneaking suspicion that someone didn't get out of a thing what they'ed hoped..." is what is the insult to me. The implication inside your words is that I meant something negative and not good. Period. No wheedling out of that, TH, word master or not.
Insulting me now is unnecessary!
What are you doing?! Quit it!This why some may call you hurtful names in response, TH.
Pesky things, quotes...if they aren't erased I mean.
Town, I can work with words, quotes are not pesky to me. I don't have to be a word smith or master to be a word understanderer..uh.. hmm.
But then again I'm boring.
She's a great cautionary tale. Though I don't bring her up that often. In this case, a perfect fit, so to speak.
Really? I thought you rode Eeset like your favorite saddle pony
lol. Uuups. Sorry.
Well hello Mr It Is Not always Just About You, I told them nicely at the end that they were trying to make it look ok when it was by design a bizarre thing. What they were doing at the end was disgusting. THEN YOU opened a look alike thread and said I had wanted to hurt you! Very Wrong of you to think that over hair..
Hmm. Omitting smilies doesn't seem to leave a lot... I don't know what to say to that, hehehe
EXCEPT You obviously do not understand my intents!
My own admission?? I wish I could charge admission for your word play!
You're welcome. Funny response. I appreciated it. And really, how often am I going to get to say that to you?
That's a queer comment.
I suppose upward was too much to hope for.
lain:Try quotes. It's funny how quotes have a way of sorting memories out.
You don't. I read through the thread. It was people mostly having fun with the notion. Apparently not what you had in mind. :idunno:
See, that's you trying to make questionable or bad what was only harmless and light. And you're doing that because your purpose was questionable and bad, not harmless and light. That's ironic.
Angry isn't mad...hokay.
lain: You should rewrite a dictionary. oly: See, that's you calling me deceptive without actually saying it. So you do just fine using words.
Beheld.
No, it's an observation. People are having fun and you close it down. You must not have wanted that.
You should consider that in light of your entry here. Because in that light it's very funny.
I agree that people who do that are almost always in your position.
See, to me that's a real glimpse into your thinking. I don't pay much attention to the Shirley Temple act around it. You aren't really sorry and there's nothing funny about what Sod tried to do.
You write about something else? That's encouraging.
No, I didn't.
I nominate rainee for Least Likely to Succeed (at using quotes).
And the winner is: no one who reads her, ever. :first:
Last edited:
Being inferentially insulting in a way that doesn't hold up under challenge, use quotes and the like?
Yeah, you really nail that one. You should be a supervisor by now.
lain:
Being inferentially insulting in a way that doesn't hold up under challenge, use quotes and the like?
Yeah, you really nail that one. You should be a supervisor by now.
you are wrong about voting for republicans
the supreme court is proving that
austin is proving that
and
it could be that you are just wrong
You're saying I mostly shouldn't do that? Because I mostly do.
No, it isn't and hasn't. Republicans gave us Roe and the Court isn't going to do anything to overturn Roe.
You don't even believe it will, because you say we have to destroy the Democratic party for that to work and we both know that won't happen, that it's easier to change an issue than a whole philosophy among people.
That's why you never take me on when it comes to that.
still talking about what happened 40 years ago
but
nothing to say about what is going on now
at the supreme court
in austin
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it the next semester.
I only just did, presenting a quick form of the argument and question you always run from, like you just did again.
That's not The Supreme Court and its not overturning Roe. That's a side bar.
Last edited: