Challenge/Offer To Bob B...

[bob b]

Nope. More likely that the classification is wrong, especially towards the ends where arguments rage yearly over who should be classified where. A major problem might pose a challenge though.

Yep. If something is true, this proves evolution.

But if we find that sometimes it is not true, then this also proves evolution.

Now I understand. Thanks, I needed that.

 

[Stripe]

Do you think that's the best criteria to select analogies with?

That may not have come out the way I intended. Apologies.

 

[death2impiety]

Yep. If something is true, this proves evolution.

But if we find that sometimes it is not true, then this also proves evolution.

Now I understand. Thanks, I needed that.

:chuckle:

 

[Johnny]

Yep. If something is true, this proves evolution.

But if we find that sometimes it is not true, then this also proves evolution.

Now I understand. Thanks, I needed that.

Did I say that it also proves evolution? Don't recall those words coming out of my mouth.

 

[bob b]

Did I say that it also proves evolution? Don't recall those words coming out of my mouth.

Sorry. I know that my reply didn't quite "fit", but I had it lying around and I like it, so this was my best chance so far to whip it out for a laugh.