7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
False.He became a murderer by killing Abel.
1 John 3:15 Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. |
False.He became a murderer by killing Abel.
1 John 3:15 Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him. |
He became a killer by killing Abel.He became a murderer by killing Abel.
Not at all.These passages contradict your ideas.
That is a good way to look at it, as Jesus did say it is adultery to even look on a woman with lust, so it must also hold true that looking on someone with hate is murder.False.
1 John 3:15
Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
I am surprised 7djengo7 didn't correct you too.He became a killer by killing Abel.
I would argue that murder as a concept was created with the ten commandments
The problem in your reasoning is that we don't lose our free moral agency be becoming Christians. If we wern't free moral agents we could never become Christians in the first place. We can still choose to sin.Not at all.
"Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin."
This is from Paul's narrative of his past while still in the flesh.
He wasn't anymore when he wrote Romans.
"For when we were in the flesh,..." (Rom 7:5)
"Gal 5:16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.
Gal 5:17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
Gal 5:18 But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Gal 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
Gal 5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
Gal 5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."
I am not sure of what your point is, but I agree with all those verses.
Summed up with..."Walk in the Spirit and you won't fulfill the lusts of the flesh."
Paul was right !
Thanks be to God.
Rom_6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
1Jn_1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1Jn_2:1 My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
I agree we still have the choice of slapping Jesus in the kisser, or not, after conversion.The problem in your reasoning is that we don't lose our free moral agency be becoming Christians.
Plus we can now choose not to commit sin and carry out that choice by the grace of God which we didn't have previously while we walked in the flesh.If we wern't free moral agents we could never become Christians in the first place. We can still choose to sin.
I agree.I agree that Galatians 5: 22, 23 tell us we can overcome sin, but that doesn't mean we will always choose to not sin.
"Should" is probably the word of choice by the interpreters of what we read today.Why does Paul say that the old man was crucified so that we should not serve sin rather than telling us we cannot serve sin?
Because the folks he was writing to were not holding fast to the the tenets.And why do we find all throughout his writings counsel to the churches not to sin?
John, in 1 John, uses a lot of juxtapositioning to illustrate the great difference between those walking in the light-God, and those walking in the darkness-sin.The same with John's writings in 1st, 2nd. and 3rd John all the statements he makes about sin and righteousness?
They don't argue against each other.Like I said your beliefs contradict scripture as Paul and John do not disagree. The Bible does not argue against itself.
I don't like making long posts as I had a stroke a year oe so ago and my left hand doesn't work well for typing. I'll just address what I see as the key point in your reply.I agree we still have the choice of slapping Jesus in the kisser, or not, after conversion.
But those who have shed the "flesh" don't !
Plus we can now choose not to commit sin and carry out that choice by the grace of God which we didn't have previously while we walked in the flesh.
I agree.
It does however tell us what those walking in the Spirit's reactions will be to any temptation.
"Should" is probably the word of choice by the interpreters of what we read today.
John uses "cannot" in 1 John 3:9.
Because the folks he was writing to were not holding fast to the the tenets.
All (?) his letter were correcting fleshly behavior of those professing Christ, but not acting like Christ.
John, in 1 John, uses a lot of juxtapositioning to illustrate the great difference between those walking in the light-God, and those walking in the darkness-sin.
Just as Paul did in Rom 8, where he juxtaposed those walking in the Spirit with those walking in the flesh, they illustrated the chasm between believers and unbelievers.
Both show us a right way and a wrong way of life.
Those walking in darkness-sin and those walking in the flesh, are not "in Christ".
They don't argue against each other.
1Jn 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1Jn 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1Jn 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
Jn 3:6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
1Co 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
1Co 3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.
1Co 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?
1Co 5:1 It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father's wife.
1Co 5:2 And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that hath done this deed might be taken away from among you.
What a bizarre reaction from you to a post in which I documented you glaringly contradicting 1 John 3:15. You claimed that Cain became a murderer by murdering his brother Abel, whereas Scripture states that Cain was already a murderer, and so did not become a murderer by murdering Abel.That is a good way to look at it,
Not at all.I don't like making long posts as I had a stroke a year oe so ago and my left hand doesn't work well for typing. I'll just address what I see as the key point in your reply.
You would have John ague with himself,
Thus I say you are misreading John's meaning.
I agree.I say this is a true text. So what does it mean to abide in Christ? To me this means I stay in contact with Him every day and even more frequently than that. I pray multiple time a day asking for Him to make me like Him and I spend time in His word every day getting to know Him better.
If a certain behavior doesn't illustrate Christ, stop doing it.Yet I still do what is wrong sometimes. I get irritable, raise my voice to my wife, get upset with posters on line, etc....
I did respond.I also noticed you didn't respond to the question I asked you about why Paul's writings are filled with counsel to the church members on what to do with those who sin.
Cannot and do not are separate questions.So where are all these people who cannot sin in Paul's writings?
I thank you for going a little deeper into the thought about murder than I did.What a bizarre reaction from you to a post in which I documented you glaringly contradicting 1 John 3:15. You claimed that Cain became a murderer by murdering his brother Abel, whereas Scripture states that Cain was already a murderer, and so did not become a murderer by murdering Abel.
You didn't address the scripture I gave you.Not at all.
If you are referring to 1 John, John is presenting juxtaposing POVs.
One applies to those walking in God...the light, and the other applies to those walking in sin...darkness.
I agree.
If a certain behavior doesn't illustrate Christ, stop doing it.
Keep praying about those things, so that God will allow your growth in grace and knowledge.
I did respond.
The folks he wrote about were not being Christians.
Adultery, covetousness, going to the unbelievers for judgement, requiring circumcision, holding dietary restrictions that had passed away, and other things that were counter to walking in the Spirit, all needed refuting.
He even wrote that some should be cast out.
Cannot and do not are separate questions.
All men "can" sin, but Christians, those who have truly repented of sin and received the gift of the Holy Ghost, don't sin.
Christians have crucified the flesh and walk in the Spirit.
We walk in the light, and not in darkness.
The wayward were getting all the ink.
I like how Paul concluded these epistles.
1 Cor 16:22..."If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha."
2 Cor 13:11..."Finally, brethren, farewell. Be perfect, be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace shall be with you."
Gal 6:16..."And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God."
Eph 5:27..."That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish."
There are your folks who do not sin.
Deu_30:6 And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live.
Eze 36:25 Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you.
Eze 36:26 A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.
Eze 36:27 And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.
Col 2:11 In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:
Isa_51:7 Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their revilings.
If you are referring to 1 John
We'll find out on the day of judgement.
Just because something is possible doesn't mean it has to happen.
Those reborn of God's seed will obey God...always.
Those who don't resist are not of God's seed.
The "new heart" is related to the nation of Israel. The body of Christ is a new creature.These are basically the same promise as given in Galatians 5: 22,23. A new heart and God's Spirit put within enabling them to live in God's statutes and keep His judgements because of love for Him.
Deuteronomy 30:6 has nothing to do with gentiles.And here is the fulfillment of Deuteronomy 30: 6 given to the Gentiles.
I know how you think about them. That was the point. The promises given to Israel are the same as those given to the Gentiles.The "new heart" is related to the nation of Israel. The body of Christ is a new creature.
Deuteronomy 30:6 has nothing to do with gentiles.
Deut 29:29-30:10 (AKJV/PCE)
(29:29) The secret [things belong] unto the LORD our God: but those [things which are] revealed [belong] unto us and to our children for ever, that [we] may do all the words of this law. (30:1) And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call [them] to mind among all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath driven thee, (30:2) And shalt return unto the LORD thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul; (30:3) That then the LORD thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the LORD thy God hath scattered thee. (30:4) If [any] of thine be driven out unto the outmost [parts] of heaven, from thence will the LORD thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee: (30:5) And the LORD thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers. (30:6) And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live. (30:7) And the LORD thy God will put all these curses upon thine enemies, and on them that hate thee, which persecuted thee. (30:8) And thou shalt return and obey the voice of the LORD, and do all his commandments which I command thee this day. (30:9) And the LORD thy God will make thee plenteous in every work of thine hand, in the fruit of thy body, and in the fruit of thy cattle, and in the fruit of thy land, for good: for the LORD will again rejoice over thee for good, as he rejoiced over thy fathers: (30:10) If thou shalt hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which are written in this book of the law, [and] if thou turn unto the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul.
That is ALL about Israel and the children of Israel.
No, they are not. That is the point of quoting the scripture.I know how you think about them. That was the point. The promises given to Israel are the same as those given to the Gentiles.
I disagree. I'm not a dispensationalist. I do agree that God is not a liar. Besides, what difference does it make? God gave the promises, not a man, and they match up to what Paul and John said. If you don't like that, take it up with God as the promises to Israel come from His word.No, they are not. That is the point of quoting the scripture.
God gave Israel promises specific to the nation of Israel, like the promise of the land. God is not a lair.
You can be wrong, if you so choose.I disagree.
That's too bad and probably not completely true.I'm not a dispensationalist.
That's good. You got one right.I do agree that God is not a liar.
It makes a huge difference. God made promises specifically to Israel and He will keep them.Besides, what difference does it make?
Whatever that's supposed to mean...God gave the promises, not a man,
Paul said that God will restore the kingdom of Israel after the fullness of the gentile come in.and they match up to what Paul and John said.
You are immensely confused. God promised Israel that they would be safe in their land forever. That will happen some day.If you don't like that, take it up with God as the promises to Israel come from His word.