7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Was he wearing a tie, and if so, what color was it?
Can a Christian lose their salvation
- Thread starter Bright Raven
- Start date
Why so you want to embarrass yourself? They list several of the sins delineated in the 10 commandments and sin is the transgression of the law.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
So, you agree that Paul says nothing about the Ten Commandments in the verses you quoted.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Domo arigato, Mr. Miyagi.Edit: Actually, they don't. The Ten Commandments are a proscription only against sins of those who are under the Ten Commandments (Mosaic law): viz., the children of Israel.
Whose sin? What law?
Last edited:
What law do you suppose, John a jew, was referring to?
So what?
Edit: Actually, they don't. The Ten Commandments are a proscription only against sins of those who are under the Ten Commandments (Mosaic law): viz., the children of Israel.
Whose sin? What law?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Whatever law the sinner is under.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
In another thread, beginning with my post at the following link, I've already discussed the sort of error (born of hastiness and inattentiveness) you are advocating:
The NINE CommandmentsBoy, that's an old rebuttal to obedience to the 10 Commandments. They're too much for us to bear? Funny thing is I have been following that with the simple question "Which Commandment(s) are too difficult for us to keep?" for about a decade and you know what? Not ONE single time has that...
theologyonline.com
|
Hastiness and inattention? You know better than that. You've read my posts for quite a while now. You know the quality of my research,
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
What an inopportune moment/context for you to have written "inattention".
You're really funny.What an inopportune moment/context for you to have written "inattention".
Right Divider
Body part
This is your problem. Many things are scriptural but they are not dispensational (i.e., They are NOT current).
It seems to be because you do not understand that it means to be a dispensationalist. You seem to have some strange "idea" of what it means and you argue against that and not actually dispensationalism.
Dispensationalism is simply the recognition that God does different things at different time with different people. God has different "rules" from time to time. This does NOT mean that everything changes, as some things are universal.
What does that have to do with anything?
That is a LIE. Why do you LIE?
Again, you LIE.
Your straw-man "dispensationalist" is no match for you, but the real thing stands up just fine.
You should take the time to learn about the beliefs that prove you wrong on so many counts.
Last edited:
I see the fruits of your beliefs, and that is enough for me. Jesus said by their fruits ye shall know them.
Right Divider
Body part
It figures that you will not actually address what others say, since you cannot.
Are you a Christian Scientist?
Last edited:
So? What we believe has everything to do with how we behave. It's a law of human nature. Is there a reason that those who do not believe in God become pedophiles, alcoholics and drug addicts?
Right Divider
Body part
You cannot discuss Christian doctrine without getting hysterical.
Why do you think I'm hysterical? You know me well enough by now to know I don't get that way.
Right Divider
Body part
Then discuss without resorting to misdirection and lies.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Could you give an example of some proposition, and of some behavior that you'd say believing said proposition "has everything to do with"?
There you go. There's my evidence.