no time
gimmee a 15 second summary
Now I know why you trust scientists. :rotfl:
no time
gimmee a 15 second summary
It's not biased, but you wouldn't know that, cause you don't have time to do research.in full disclosure, i am a scientist, by training education and professional experience
and i'm right now, at this moment watching a couple of videos to prepare me for open lab in a few minutes
so your silly biased youtube clip just isn't all that important to me right now
sorry :idunno:
It's not biased, but you wouldn't know that, cause you don't have time to do research.
If you watch movies like "Porky's", then I doubt this movie is going to help you to see clearly about how the government uses science to manipulate an entire generation. Nevertheless, naive people are easily swayed when they are too lazy to do any research. Just look at how Granite has turned out.no, i remember when it came out
i wasn't as impressed by it as i was by wrath of khan or porky's :idunno:
i know a lot of leftist hippie scumbag stoners thought it was totally rad
If you watch movies like "Porky's", then I doubt this movie is going to help you to see clearly about how the government uses science to manipulate an entire generation. Nevertheless, naive people are easily swayed when they are too lazy to do any research. Just look at how Granite has turned out.
If you watch movies like "Porky's"...
No. But that was the opinion of the scientists working with the government in the late 40's and 50's. There was a plethora of misinformation by the government, science, and the media in order to manipulate the masses to believe what is false in order to control them.so it's your opinion that radiation will result in a race of bald-headed people?
No. But that was the opinion of the scientists working with the government in the late 40's and 50's.
They can for men, but not for women.California lawmakers seek to end 'personal belief' vaccine exemptions
Read more here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/04/us-usa-measles-california-idUSKBN0L82NR20150204
From another article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ersonal-belief-vaccine-opt-out-now-in-danger/
Do you think the states should be able to mandate immunizations? If so why and if not why not?
Watch the film. It's real footage of what was being said to the masses at that time, not commentary. :sigh:cite?
No it's not.Measles is nothing to shrug off. It's pretty serious.
The government, CDC/Pharma, and the media are creating hysteria over these measles outbreaks to create fear, in order to make mandatory vaccines a major political debate in the 2016 elections. It's the prefect way to get many on the right (including the candidates) to turn left, and support more government control. This may indeed lead to the deaths of many Americans, not because of vaccines or diseases, but because people will defend their right to not have their babies injected with toxins.
Watch the film. It's real footage of what was being said to the masses at that time, not commentary. :sigh:
They can for men, but not for women.
Us women get to decide what we want in our body and what we do not.
Or does that rule only apply to human life within?
On a serious note, I do not agree that the state should have the authority to force vaccinations.
Although, if an outbreak occurs, those that choose not to vaccinate to keep it at bay, ..... are stupid people.
Measles is nothing to shrug off. It's pretty serious.
Measles
Fact sheet N°286
Reviewed February 2015
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key facts
Measles is one of the leading causes of death among young children even though a safe and cost-effective vaccine is available.
In 2013, there were 145 700 measles deaths globally – about 400 deaths every day or 16 deaths every hour.
... I do not agree that the state should have the authority to force vaccinations.
Although, if an outbreak occurs, those that choose not to vaccinate to keep it at bay, ..... are stupid people.
Measles is nothing to shrug off. It's pretty serious.
historically, it was a killer in the us
If there was a contagious disease that only less than 2% of the population contracted yearly (without any vaccine existing for that disease), and the death rate for those that contracted it was less than .017%, would you call that "pretty serious" and "nothing to shrug off?"