logos_x
New member
PastorKevin said:You're right. I teach the Bible. I teach God's Word. That is what I have been called to teach and to defend.
I know. And, I'm trying to show you where you aren't teaching it.
PastorKevin said:You're right. I teach the Bible. I teach God's Word. That is what I have been called to teach and to defend.
So, you don't have a response to my arguments, then.PastorKevin said:But you don't believe the Bible to be God's Word so it is pointless to even discuss the issue with you. This entire debate was again centered around what does the Bible say about whether unbelievers spend eternity in the Lake of Fire or not. My arguments are based purely on what the Bible says.
Balder said:So, you don't have a response to my arguments, then.
If you are interested in testifying about the "good news" to the lost of the world, Pastor, then you should be prepared to answer honest criticisms of the story you are presenting.
Interpretations are different from quoting directly what it says.Particularly when your interpretation of what the Bible "says" is not exclusive.
If your interpretation results in the sort of monstrous story I've been trying to expose here, then perhaps you need to think further about your interpretation.
logos_x said:I know. And, I'm trying to show you where you aren't teaching it.
Balder said:Which questions would you like me to answer? I didn't answer the "whose fault is that" question because I thought your analogy was faulty.
We're not dealing with someone who sticks their hand in a fire to see what it's like.
We're dealing with an omnipotent being, who could choose to "settle" things in any number of ways (and I could think of a few, and world religions give examples of other possible ways), but who instead decides to lock a good portion of his creations in conditions of inescapable, conscious torment, in a fiery place of punishment and pain that he himself built. It's not like it's just something naturally occurring there that you warn people about. It's something God himself designed and built, with the intention of throwing sentient beings into it. AFTER giving them bodies which are imperishable, thus ensuring that they will not simply perish or be annihilated, but will instead suffer forever.
That is the picture you are trying to sell me and others like me. The story of a loving sacrifice to deliver people from a very cruel fate which God himself designed, supervises, and perpetually sustains, loses its weight and beauty because of the sadistic horror of the story within which it is set.
As I have said, your simple story is inappropriate. If you purposefully leave the burner on, and if you force your child's hand down onto it every time he misbehaves, that would be a closer analogy. Then whose fault is it, if the child gets 3rd degree burns?PastorKevin said:I have responded to everything you have said. If you are afraid to answer the question it must show something about your theology. A simple question. If I tell my child that if he touches the hot burner he will be burned and he touches it. Whose fault is it? How can you reason about eternal things when you won't even reason about simple things?
Balder said:But to answer your question: Yes, if the child touches something you've warned him not to touch, that is indeed his fault. Unfortunately, that little story leaves so much out, and the devil is in the details.
PastorKevin said:You have not done that. Not even close.
I have tried to replace your analogies with different ones because I think your analogies only work in little vacuum sealed packages, not when you take the rest of the "story" into account.PastorKevin said:I also gave you the analogy of a prison being built which you never responded to because you want to blame God that people spend eternity in the Lake of Fire. You know in your heart that you are wrong and that is why you won't answer an easy and honest question with a simple answer. Is the mayor who builds the prison at fault if people go there? No they don't have to go there is the only answer that a logical person would say. They don't have to commit those wicked crimes.
God created the Lake of Fire for the devil and his angels. God was grieved when man chose rebellion as well. But when man chose to rebel, man sealed his place there as well. God loved man enough to give His own Son Jesus Christ so that man would not have to go there. You are spitting on the sacrifice of God's Son and trying to blame Him for it?
Men don't have to go there if they will humble themselves and accept God's way instead of their own. That's the bottom line and that is a message of great hope.
Balder said:I have tried to replace your analogies with different ones because I think your analogies only work in little vacuum sealed packages, not when you take the rest of the "story" into account.
For instance, Christians also teach that it is impossible for human beings not to sin; it is impossible for any of us to live the kind of righteous life God demands. So, in this case, the mayor builds a furnace and throws citizens into it for failing to live up to standards that are, in fact, impossible for them to live up to...
PastorKevin said:And if a mayor builds a prison for the detainment of hard core criminals, is the mayor to blame that those criminals commit wicked crimes and go there?
PastorKevin said:God knew the hoplessness of the situation so He insterted hope. Stephen if you and I only disagree on the eternality of the Lake of Fire, then why do pagans so easily and readily identify with Universalists and get their thumbs up and praise while I get their scorn?
Balder said:I have tried to replace your analogies with different ones because I think your analogies only work in little vacuum sealed packages, not when you take the rest of the "story" into account.
For instance, Christians also teach that it is impossible for human beings not to sin; it is impossible for any of us to live the kind of righteous life God demands. So, in this case, the mayor builds a furnace and throws citizens into it for failing to live up to standards that are, in fact, impossible for them to live up to...
Perhaps because the pagans have human empathy? Maybe they actually love their neighbor and don't think they will someday rejoice to see their fellow man thrown in to a fiery pit to be tortured forever.PastorKevin said:God knew the hoplessness of the situation so He insterted hope. Stephen if you and I only disagree on the eternality of the Lake of Fire, then why do pagans so easily and readily identify with Universalists and get their thumbs up and praise while I get their scorn?
Balder said:Not for everyone, Kevin. There are millions of human beings who have died who have never even heard of Jesus or YHWH. But they're all getting the same eternal punishment....
But besides this fact, the "way out" is from a monstrous fate that God himself designed
and which he oversees (eternal torment in a Lake of Fire in imperishable bodies). That was my point several posts back.
And the monstrosity of the overall story, in which God is directly involved, diminishes the impact of the "gift" he is offering.
"If you love my son, I won't burn you alive forever...."
What you are forgetting is that many universalists don't believe its a literal fire.PastorKevin said:Well supposedly Balder, Christian Universalists would disagree with you on this statement and say that God did in fact create a Lake of Fire but it is not eternal. They say that sins are judged in the Lake of Fire for a period of "ages". We will see if they have the courage to stand up to your error.