I'm certainly not going to wade through the entire book to dig up more examples for you---nor do I need to (see Post #59). You've been categorically disproven on a public forum. You're arguing now from the sheer pride of not wanting to lose, and only managing to embarrass yourself. Your claims have been objectively refuted. Get used to it.Didn't remember that line, but you're still a couple of alleged ghosts short of:
Well sure, 'cause a story filled with ghosts doesn't qualify as a ghost story... The author himself labels it "A Ghost Story"!Which still wouldn't make it a ghost story.
Entirely irrelevant, for the numerous reasons already demonstrated in previous posts above. Review the thread.But that's before we even get to the principle note that the Victorian tradition of ghost stories died out of popular culture a wee bit prior to the 1960's in America. lain:
I know. But not in the country and time period when the song was written. That was my objection.No. Go look it up. Telling ghost stories on Christmas Eve was traditional.
As opposed to, "No one told scary ghosts stories a long time ago."...9. Most Wonderful Time (because no one tells scary ghost stories at Christmas, that's why) :mmph:
Exactly. And so my objection. The rest with CC is mostly for fun, though it does represent my thinking, as does the above.The tradition of holiday ghost stories was pretty much squelched in America.
Now that sounds overly serious, don't you think.If you're serious, get a grip.
Absolutely.That it's a great piece of literature doesn't mean A Christmas Carol isn't a ghost story.
I'm smiling. Promise.Have some fun.
No harm in it at all, though I don't and can't think of it as one for the reasons given, however Dickens sold it...I suppose "A Tale of an Old, Greedy Man Who Wasted Life In Pursuit Of Pointless Accumulation Of Wealth Instead Of Cultivating Human Kindness" wouldn't have been a draw.It's okay that it's a Christmas ghost story.
"Who and what are you?" Scrooge demanded.
"I am the Ghost of Christmas Past."
Didn't remember that line, but you're still a couple of alleged ghosts short of:
...a story that features four ghosts as main characters, and describes dozens of ghosts as background individuals.
Which still wouldn't make it a ghost story.
"Who, and what are you?" Scrooge demanded.
"I am the Ghost of Christmas Past."
"I am the Ghost of Christmas Present," said the Spirit. "Look upon me!"
"I am in the presence of the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come?" said Scrooge.
The Spirit answered not, but pointed onward with its hand.
"Spirit!” he said, "this is a fearful place. In leaving it, I shall not leave its lesson, trust me. Let us go!"
Still the Ghost pointed with an unmoved finger to the head.
The Phantom slowly, gravely, silently, approached. When it came near him, Scrooge bent down upon his knee; for in the very air through which this Spirit moved it seemed to scatter gloom and mystery.
It was shrouded in a deep black garment, which concealed its head, its face, its form, and left nothing of it visible save one outstretched hand. But for this it would have been difficult to detach its figure from the night, and separate it from the darkness by which it was surrounded.
He felt that it was tall and stately when it came beside him, and that its mysterious presence filled him with a solemn dread. He knew no more, for the Spirit neither spoke nor moved.
“I am in the presence of the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come?” said Scrooge.
The Spirit answered not, but pointed onward with its hand.
“You are about to show me shadows of the things that have not happened, but will happen in the time before us,” Scrooge pursued. “Is that so, Spirit?”
The upper portion of the garment was contracted for an instant in its folds, as if the Spirit had inclined its head. That was the only answer he received.
Although well used to ghostly company by this time, Scrooge feared the silent shape so much that his legs trembled beneath him, and he found that he could hardly stand when he prepared to follow it. The Spirit paused a moment, as observing his condition, and giving him time to recover.
But Scrooge was all the worse for this. It thrilled him with a vague uncertain horror, to know that behind the dusky shroud, there were ghostly eyes intently fixed upon him, while he, though he stretched his own to the utmost, could see nothing but a spectral hand and one great heap of black.
“Ghost of the Future!” he exclaimed, “I fear you more than any spectre I have seen. But as I know your purpose is to do me good, and as I hope to live to be another man from what I was, I am prepared to bear you company, and do it with a thankful heart. Will you not speak to me?”
It gave him no reply. The hand was pointed straight before them.
Often. Though I think Dickens uses ghost where we'd use spirit these days, ghosts being typically the spirit of a dead person and not the spirit of a season, etc. Now Marley is an example of a ghost in modern parlance.You're out of your mind.
Often. Though I think Dickens uses ghost where we'd use spirit these days, ghosts being typically the spirit of a dead person and not the spirit of a season, etc. Now Marley is an example of a ghost in modern parlance.
Scrooge fell upon his knees, and clasped his hands before his face.
“Mercy!” he said. “Dreadful apparition, why do you trouble me?”
“Man of the worldly mind!” replied the Ghost, “do you believe in me or not?”
“I do,” said Scrooge. “I must. But why do spirits walk the earth, and why do they come to me?”
“It is required of every man,” the Ghost returned, “that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellowmen, and travel far and wide; and if that spirit goes not forth in life, it is condemned to do so after death. It is doomed to wander through the world—oh, woe is me!—and witness what it cannot share, but might have shared on earth, and turned to happiness!”
I already agreed that Marley was a ghost. I even acknowledged what I never denied, which is how Dickens wrote it. At least I thought I did. If I didn't, Marley most definitely was a ghost by any definition and Dickens wrote ghost all over the place.Again, you can read what Dickens said in A Christmas Carol, instead of speculating:
I know. But not in the country and time period when the song was written. That was my objection.No. Go look it up. Telling ghost stories on Christmas Eve was traditional.
As opposed to, "No one told scary ghosts stories a long time ago."...9. Most Wonderful Time (because no one tells scary ghost stories at Christmas, that's why) :mmph:
At best, some people tell a ghost story. Though traditionally a ghost story is actually a story about a ghost. I suppose that's why, cover notwithstanding, I've never thought of it as a ghost story, only a story where one particularly memorable one appears.
In fact, I've used Marley's chains as a rhetorical device since the first time I read it.
Exactly. And so my objection. The rest with CC is mostly for fun, though it does represent my thinking, as does the above.The tradition of holiday ghost stories was pretty much squelched in America.
Now that sounds overly serious, don't you think.If you're serious, get a grip.
Absolutely.That it's a great piece of literature doesn't mean A Christmas Carol isn't a ghost story.
I'm smiling. Promise.Have some fun.
No harm in it at all, though I don't and can't think of it as one for the reasons given, however Dickens sold it...I suppose "A Tale of an Old, Greedy Man Who Wasted Life In Pursuit Of Pointless Accumulation Of Wealth Instead Of Cultivating Human Kindness" wouldn't have been a draw.It's okay that it's a Christmas ghost story.
Merry Christmas, zoo. :cheers:
Sneaky rascal. Which list does that go on for you?"I want a Hippopotamus for Christmas" ..
I already agreed that Marley was a ghost. I even acknowledged what I never denied, which is how Dickens wrote it. At least I thought I did. If I didn't, Marley most definitely was a ghost by any definition and Dickens wrote ghost all over the place.
Also, you really should have read the post you still don't seem to have. Here it goes again:
I'll file the above under N, for Nanged. lain: It was that or A and a banning. On the bright side, you just made CC's Christmas card list.Not sure whether to file this under A for Annoying, R for Ridiculous, S for Sad or W for What Remarkable Hubris.
Maybe P for Puffy.
I guess under S. I'll put it with Lighthouse saying "Bob [Cratchit] was part of the problem as well by not seeking better and more gainful employment."
:think: That's a hard thing to overcome. Impossible even. So I won't try and we'll be even. :thumb:I read it the first time and I didn't buy it then either.
...Have some fun.