taoist said:Misquote, Shadowx. And deliberately out of context. We've got a special smiley just for you.
:troll:
To claim that the OV asserts that God has no control is simply not true and for you to claim that Bob asserts this after reading his last post, quite frankly Dave I thought better of you than that!Dave Miller said:...Nope, trusting in God's absolute power to bring about goodness from the midst of evil, and
trusting that God has absolute control even in the midst of the worst evil. As Sam has said many
times, the thought that God has no control in the midst of evil is far more frightening than the
thought that God allows evil to occur...
Theological debate should be undertook with professional precision and dispassion,
deardelmar said:from the Critique thread
To claim that the OV asserts that God has no control is simply not true and for you to claim that Bob asserts this after reading his last post, quite frankly Dave I thought better of you than that!
You've got to be kidding me. If Bob was any more OFF topic, we'd have to put the debate on a different website!Rimi said:Couldn't make a decision in round 1, as it seemed more introductory. Round 2, both were strong. But it was Brian's letter and this quote in round 3:
These were the dealbreakers. I don't think Bob was hasty at all in declaring victory.
And false. See above post.deardelmar said:Now I am willing to say that Bob is winning the debate. The letter from Brian Rohrbough was powerfull!
Who the hell has ever raped a baby? Why do you guys get all dramatic and offensive against my views by declaring such retarded notions?Rimi said:Let me see if I understand you correctly, ZMan . . . . I have many questions for you . . . .
. . . when a baby is raped, this is what God wanted to have happen?
Wanted? No. But ordained? Yes.. . . when a woman is raped, this is what God wanted to have happen?
All of these examples you bring up to prove freewill are horrible. Not to mention, you are not making a clear rebuttal against my post HERE. My point is that God ordains calamities in our life, and Scripture proves it. You have begun an entirely different debate about freewill.Answer why God said to Cain in Genesis 4:6-7:
"Why are you angry?
Apparently, Cain had a choice to not be angry or God wouldn't feel the need to ask. Why is God asking if He's the one who made Cain to be angry anyway?
Why is your face downcast?
If Cain doesn't really have a choice because God knows what he's doing to do anyway, why is God asking?
If you do what is right, will you not be accepted?
Why is God saying this since He's orchestrating everything anyway? Doesn't He know the answer?
But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it."
Why would God give advice since He knows how it's going to play out anyway?
If God knows every choice, He would know every thought, yes? Then answer why God said to HIMSELF in Gen 6:3 and 11:6):
"My Spirit will not contend wth man forever, for he is mortal, his days will be a hundred and twenty years."
??? They have no free will, so why are they contending with God? Why is he saying this? Per you, He already knew this was going to happen, didn't He?
"If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them."
Thought they didn't have free will. Wonder why God is surprised here. Why does God think nothing will be impossible for them if He knows exactly what's going to happen?
because man has free will which no one denies. Man is responsible for his independent actions but that does not prevent God's foreknowledge. Are you attempting to make God the author of evil and responsible fort the evil that man has chosen?Rimi said:Let me see if I understand you correctly, ZMan . . . . I have many questions for you . . . .
. . . when a baby is raped, this is what God wanted to have happen?
. . . when a woman is raped, this is what God wanted to have happen?
it is for Cain's benefit that the questions were ask. Not God's. This in no way implies that God did not know the answers.Answer why God said to Cain in Genesis 4:6-7:
"Why are you angry?
Apparently, Cain had a choice to not be angry or God wouldn't feel the need to ask. Why is God asking if He's the one who made Cain to be angry anyway?
Why is your face downcast?
If Cain doesn't really have a choice because God knows what he's doing to do anyway, why is God asking?
If you do what is right, will you not be accepted?
Why is God saying this since He's orchestrating everything anyway? Doesn't He know the answer?
But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must master it."
Why would God give advice since He knows how it's going to play out anyway?
[What makes you think that God was surprised? God's knowing does not prevent free choice. Your statement,"They have no free will", is a false assumption. No not bear false witness against me.If God knows every choice, He would know every thought, yes? Then answer why God said to HIMSELF in Gen 6:3 and 11:6):
"My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal, his days will be a hundred and twenty years."
??? They have no free will, so why are they contending with God? Why is he saying this? Per you, He already knew this was going to happen, didn't He?
"If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them."
Thought they didn't have free will. Wonder why God is surprised here. Why does God think nothing will be impossible for them if He knows exactly what's going to happen?
I need to look up the word blasphemy to see if it applies.
Did God make the choice for you or did you make the choice? When God knew your choice has no relevance in your ability to make it.Rimi said:E4E, if God knows every single decision before man makes it, then it's the way it's going to be, and therefore not really free will. It just is.
They do not understand the Biblical truth that even though God ordains it, we are still responsible. Jonathan Edwards once said:elected4ever said:Z, I think these guys wont to take God of his throne and make him responsible for the evil in the heart of man, which man chose by the way. Now they wont God to be responsible for the evil that a man does. That is why they make these outlandish attacks against us that have no basis in factual truth.
Z Man said:He desires all men to be saved, but effectually calls only some (1 Timothy 2:4; 1 Corinthians 1:26-30; 2 Timothy 2:26).
You're not far from the truth Guy...GuySmiley said:You should add to your list:
He predestins every act of history, but then also predestins that some people He chose would actively disagree with this aspect of his nature and try to convince other people that He chose that the open view is correct.
I would not go so far as to say that God predestined every act in history but God in His foreknowledge permitted every act in history. God did not predestine man to be evil. He predestined man to be in His image which is a totally different thing. Man chose to be evil and God permitted it because God gave man the freedom of choice. God does not violate man's authority to choose by choosing some to be good and some to be evil, some to be saved and some to be lost. Those are the decisions a man makes and God permits it. None of this violates God's foreknowledge. It is God's foreknowledge that guarantees victory.GuySmiley said:You should add to your list:
He predestines every act of history, but then also predestines that some people He chose would actively disagree with this aspect of his nature and try to convince other people that He chose that the open view is correct.
E4E .... do you realize you just described Arminianism???elected4ever said:I would not go so far as to say that God predestined every act in history but God in His foreknowledge permitted every act in history. God did not predestine man to be evil. He predestined man to be in His image which is a totally different thing. Man chose to be evil and God permitted it because God made man a free moral agent. God does not violate man's free moral agency by choosing some to be good and some to be evil, some to be saved and some to be lost. Those are the decisions a man makes and God permits it. None of this violates God's foreknowledge. It is God's foreknowledge that guarantees victory.
I do not know what Arminianism is. I thought you guys said I was a Calvinist? :bang:RightIdea said:E4E .... do you realize you just described Arminianism???
:doh:
Did you not see the basic chart of the 4 views that I provided in another thread? If so, let me clarify...elected4ever said:I do not know what Arminianism is. I thought you guys said I was a Calvinist? :bang: