Nope. Evolution is just a theory.
It is a scientific theory which has stood the test of time. It is extremely well supported by the observed facts.
It is not "just a theory". And you repeating this fertilizer over and over again won't make it true.
Nope. Evolution is just a theory.
God is not a mere created designer. Scripture shows us he is the everlasting, omnipotent and omniscient Designer.Barbarian said:From a Christian standpoint, God is the Creator, not some mere created designer.
IOW... Evolutionists think that increasing genetic disorders, and loss of fitness in changing environments = increasing genetic diversity. Such rationalization is a requirement of evolutionism.Barbarian said:Also, genetic diversity can increase in bacteria the same way it increases in vertebrates.
So in other words your first statement was bologna?Barbarian said:Sexual recombination occurs though conjugation of bacteria. In some cases, different species can exchange genetic material.
And when I do, you ignore it.I have been insisting that you provide evidence for your claims.
It is a scientific theory which has stood the test of time. It is extremely well supported by the observed facts.
It is not "just a theory". And you repeating this fertilizer over and over again won't make it true.
And when I do, you ignore it.
Darwinist asserts his religion as fact. Gets called on it. Criticizes creationist.
It's not a religion. It's not "Darwanisn". And your repeating "it's just a theoory" hardly qualifies as "being called on it.
Creationism is a religious belief. Scientifically speaking, it's a theory proven wrong.
You mean the pile of posts that includes the evidence I presented?You simply haven't provided evidence.
Maybe you hope that fact got buried in the pile of posts.
You mean the pile of posts that includes the evidence I presented?
Maybe I should ask for your definition of "evidence". Maybe that word means something else in Stripese than it does in regular English.
For example: When you said that "the example of bacteria evolving resistance to antibiotics is one example that demonstrates [evolution]," I said that "bacteria changes in response to stimulai in ways that show random mutations and natural selection can have no part in the process."
This is evidence.
Except that it is false.
Because you say so? Luria and Delbrook say otherwise.
Darwinist asserts his religion as fact. Gets called on it. Criticizes creationist.
YEC asserts his religion as fact. Gets called on it. Criticizes evolutionist.
Finally you actually present some evidence.
There's no point if all you're willing to read is your Darwinism.You mean these guys?
It was presented pages ago.
There's no point if all you're willing to read is your Darwinism.