Should I "assist" someone to commit suicide if they aren't terminally ill? Why or why not?
It's funny how one can die in martyrdom, but cannot take one's life when pain is unbearable and death is imminent.
Do you honestly see no difference between someone dying naturally, and someone being deliberately killed?
Being terminally ill is the criteria being used.
Are you shifting the goal posts on me?
But if they can be saved, why is it not worth it?
I support letting people die who are close to death anyway.
I believe suicide is wrong.
I believe murder is wrong.
You believe it's wrong to kill a man with 7 months to live.
But it's acceptable, even "good," to kill a man with 6 months to live.
I'm just interested in that discrepancy.
I am trying to find out why certain people "can" commit suicide, and others "cannot."
I am trying to find out why certain people "can" commit suicide, and others "cannot."
So what's your reason for believing (I assume) that it's rightfully illegal to assist in the suicide of a healthy individual?
I don't know...how many are there?Also how do we know its 7 months or 6 months, etc.. doctors can be and often are very wrong, how many "brain dead" people whose family refused to murder them, later woke and said they heard it all?
I don't know...how many are there?
Pain, suffering, no chance for quality of life, dignity....or to answer your question, a distinct lackthereof of what makes a quality life worth living.
Exactly the point, no one knows.
Are there not people who suffer equally, if not more, due to mental illness?
I don't see how any government or individual has the right to tell one man his life is worth living, and to tell another man his is not.
Can you actually cite any?
These real life examples of people who have recovered after being pronounced "brain dead" shows that doctors and hospitals are sometimes dead wrong. This chronological list is ordered by the most recent report we have for each case:- see link
That would be impossible. There will always be a means to that end.
But that does not mean the state should encourage or allow it.
Are there not people who suffer equally, if not more, due to mental illness?
I don't see how any government or individual has the right to tell one man his life is worth living, and to tell another man his is not.
Mental illness is a tough one, it's subjective and hard to objectively measure.
Let's just say I'm around 80 years in age with an advanced terminal illness such as cancer. I'm in constant pain, perhaps immobile, going to the bathroom upon my self with only a few weeks to live. At this point in my life and given my condition, I'm more in dread of the remainder of my life than of death.
The choice is obvious: Get my affairs in order than die on my own terms.