Unless you've only got six months left.
Then screw it, kill the poor bastard. Right?
except no one is saying that and you know it.
Unless you've only got six months left.
Then screw it, kill the poor bastard. Right?
Kind of let the point sail right over your head there.
Are you involved if i have to get on public assistance for children and myself because my husband got help to end his life because of depression?
except no one is saying that and you know it.
I've only commented on Colorado's law so far. That does not allow for assisted suicide for depression. I said earlier I'd have voted against it if it did.
The fact of the matter is that anyone in favor of legalizing suicide for some people is saying that some people are worth talking out of killing themselves, and some aren't.
Why?
Because it's what I believe is right. Do I need more reasons? That's what your reason is for your views too, right?
As you said before... there is a fundemental difference.
Yes. It is not worth talking someone out of it who is going to die really soon anyway. It is worth talking someone out of it if they still have a long productive life to live.
How do you not understand that?
I believe suicide is wrong.
I believe murder is wrong.
You believe it's wrong to kill a man with 7 months to live.
But it's acceptable, even "good," to kill a man with 6 months to live.
I'm just interested in that discrepancy.
What if the murder happens in war as collateral damage? Do you make an exception then?
I believe a time had to be put on it because a line must be drawn somewhere for legal purposes. I don't think it's "wrong" at 7 months. But the law on the ballot said 6 months and I was ok with that.
Let me ask you a similar question... Why is it ok for an 18 year old to consent to sex with a 30 year old, but not for a 17 year 11 month and 30 day old person to?
Answer: because a line must be drawn somewhere if if it doesn't fully make sense.
That probably depends on the reason that particular soldier fired that particular shot.
Was it to defend his home and family? Was it to defend his country? To stop other innocent lives from being taken by the aggressors of that particular war?
None of those reasons come anywhere close to killing a guy just because he's sick.
But it would be wrong to draw that line anywhere at all if sex was always wrong.
You know, like deliberately taking the life of an innocent person (murder).
The fact of the matter is that anyone in favor of legalizing suicide for some people is saying that some people are worth talking out of killing themselves, and some aren't.
If you think that's not the exact mentality underlying support for assisted suicide, you're either naive or in denial.
You've said some dumb things before but I have to think that this one takes the cake.
again no one is saying what you claim and it is false witness to pretend otherwise
Is it always right for 18 year olds?
Illness took the life.
Your stance of saying it should NEVER be allowed would be akin to me saying it should be required.
There are way too many people alive on Earth today. If someone wants to check out, let them.
God may ask us to suffer (1 Cor. 12:26; Phil. 1:29). We are to overcome (Rev. 3:5). It's not about us. It's about him (Ac 9:16, Jn 21:19).