:AMR:Keep to that good attitude even in spite of ever running afoul of it. :up:
English, dude. English.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
:AMR:Keep to that good attitude even in spite of ever running afoul of it. :up:
Is it ever just to kill an innocent person,
One man's obfuscation is another man's embracement of ignorance.
One might think that you, having admitted ignorance, might be interested in learning, in correcting that deficit
That is the wrong question, since it implies that we enjoy the death of the wicked.
Ezekiel 18:23
23 Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die? saith the Lord God: and not that he should return from his ways, and live?
The right question is whether adulterers are worthy of death according to the judgment of God.
Romans 1:32
32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
The right question is whether adultery is a sin unto death.
1 John 5:16-17
16 If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it.
17 All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
The question remains: Do YOU want to stone adulterers? You can parse it any way you like but are you willing to cast that first stone?
Correctly convicted adulterers should be executed. Personalizing the topic is just a play at emotionalism.The question remains: Do YOU want to stone adulterers? You can parse it any way you like but are you willing to cast that first stone?
I want a society in which adultery is recognized as being a capital offense and is, thus, virtually nonexistent. Towards that end, yes, I'd be willing to cast the first stone. And the second.
Correctly convicted adulterers should be executed. Personalizing the topic is just a play at emotionalism.
You haven't got a rational argument. You want the law abolished, but you pretend "fulfilled" means it has been overturned. You want "fulfilled" to mean no more executions, but you still want punishments. You quote the Bible because you want to be seen as being scriptural, but everything you say undermines the gospel.
You're a stupid, useless addition to almost every discussion.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
I am not interfering when I say that God has determined that there are crimes/sins that are so vile that the offender must be put to death to rid the community of the evil.Then give it up to God. He doesn't need your interference.
You are arrogant enough to try to thwart justice.Justice simply IS. I'm neither arrogant enough to either dispense it, determine it nor rejoice in it.
Emotionalism is the standard set forth by the OP.If emotionalism is your standard...then you've made a compelling case!
The real question you are asking is whether you are willing to believe what God says.The question remains: Do YOU want to stone adulterers? You can parse it any way you like but are you willing to cast that first stone?
Leviticus 20:10 10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. |
Deuteronomy 17:7 7 The hands of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterward the hands of all the people. So thou shalt put the evil away from among you. |
Deuteronomy 19:16-20 16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong; 17 Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days; 18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; 19 Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. 20 And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you. |
I am not interfering when I say that God has determined that there are crimes/sins that are so vile that the offender must be put to death to rid the community of the evil.
Emotionalism is the standard set forth by the OP.
You are arrogant enough to try to thwart justice.
Then allow God to do his thing. Your commentary only serves your self-righteous ego.
What are you talking about?By allowing God to determine His judgement, on His own terms? :think:
It seems MY the one arrogant enough to presume God's will????It seems YOUR the one arrogant enough to presume God's will.
Says the one who thinks "This statement is true" is sometimes false.Give reason a whirl.
What are you talking about?
I am not declaring some standard I have created, but I am declaring the standard given by God.
Your argument is that the standard your created does not match God's standard, therefore I must be self-righteous somehow.
:kookoo:
It seems MY the one arrogant enough to presume God's will????
Would you like to buy a vowel and an apostrophe?
Spoiler
Says the one who thinks "This statement is true" is sometimes false.
God's standards have not changed in the 3,500 years since they were written down by Moses..Standards of God vary like the seasons.
I am not declaring my own opinion (like you are doing), I am declaring what God said, as written down in the scriptures.Your declarations mean nothing