Are You Qualified to be the Executioner?
- Thread starter CabinetMaker
- Start date
I didn't reference one verse; it was two. And neither of them is from the passage in question.
Again, directly: You think John 8 somehow diminishes the law, but Jesus was explicit in saying the law would remain.
See how direct that is? Notice how it demolishes your stupid opinion? See how nonsensical your response is?
Because emotionalism is a waste of time.
Learn to engage sensibly.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
genuineoriginal
New member
Are you aware that when Jesus comes back, He will rule the nations with a rod of iron and that the law of the entire world will be keeping the law of God written in the first five books of the Bible?
Christians will not be watching from balcony seats in heaven at this time, they will be set up to rule cities.
When the Law of God is the law of the land, are you going to refuse to keep it?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Tell you what Stipe, you start answering questions directly and then I'll start answering yours.
I still note that have not answered a very simple, very direct question. Why?
Who said anything about me refusing to keep the law? As a Gentile, I am not under the law. My relationship to the law is what Paul taught the Galatians.
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?ur...&share_tid=130548&share_fid=4230&share_type=t
If it was a mistake, I recommend you fix his name.
genuineoriginal
New member
If you are not under the law, are you lawless and disobedient?
1 Timothy 1:8-11 8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; 9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; 11 According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust. |
Someone define "children" for me please.
7 years old? 17 years old?
As I said before:
7 years old? 17 years old?
As I said before:
Hmmm. Well... ....off the top of my head I'd have to say that 10 years old is too long to put to death. But they will be warehoused for the rest of their lives probably. Which is really worse?
But in your view he should've never been given the nose-cleaning opportunity. Correct?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
In my view he should have paid the ultimate penalty for killing 2 year old James Patrick Bulger
drbrumley
Well-known member
Just to verify, your saying that because witnesses were not provided she was declared innocent? So the process cleared her? So if witnesses did come forward, Jesus would have said she was to be killed? Much appreciated!
No. There was more wrong with the prosecution than a lack of witnesses.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
drbrumley
Well-known member
Ok, like what was wrong with the persecution other than they were in occupied Israel under roman authority which didn't allow adulters to be killed?