There is no other way to look at it. Possessions are things. People are not things. Nor should we treat them as much.
I take care of my possessions
everyone should
There is no other way to look at it. Possessions are things. People are not things. Nor should we treat them as much.
I take care of my possessions
everyone should
you ignore the obvious
you don't have to buy their cars
if
the union sucks the blood out of a car company
but
your only option
is
to vote republican
if
the union sucks the blood out of our public schools
Until the Republicans cut the funding for the public schools, and drive away so many teachers that there aren't any. Then the point is moot.
Odd how you use the words woman, femininity and possession in the same paragraph? :think:
Odd how you use the words woman, femininity and possession in the same paragraph? :think:
many states now face massive deficits
primarily due to excessive pension benefits
demanded by the state union employees
the worst pension shortfall in the U.S.
Until the Republicans cut the funding for the public schools, and drive away so many teachers that there aren't any. Then the point is moot.
Why is that odd?
Woman. Possession.
He said femininity is a possession of women. I think you are reaching here.
I thought of another definition for feminist
any woman who has lost her femininity
what may be her most valuable possession
once you lose it
can you ever get it back?
many women consider their man to be their most valuable possession
you just have to keep him
I don't know what he meant by that. :idunno: My point is that I read Rusha's post as implying something about chrys thinking women are possessions and I don't think he meant anything like that. His post wasn't 'odd' in that respect. Or, I didn't read it that way at least.If you look at the way chrys was using the idea of possession, I think he goes further than the idea of simply possessing a quality:
It's almost as if he's comparing femininity to lost virtue. And anyway, how does a woman somehow "lose" that quality that's a part of her identity and personality? Does she wake up one morning and search around for her femininity to put on for the day only to find that, much to her horror, she's misplaced it?
I assume he does.Here he's talking about one person possessing another, and about it being the woman's job to "keep" the man. (Does he assign the man the same job I wonder?
What is 'that concept' of possession? In any case, chrys's post doesn't necessarily mean he agrees with it either. He's just saying that some women have that idea (whatever that idea is).Either way, I don't agree with that concept of possession.)
are you a feminist?
Absolutely not.
And ungodly feminists have made it very difficult for faithful, biblical, Christian women, to share their faith in public.
:help:
And anyway, how does a woman somehow "lose" that quality that's a part of her identity and personality?
My wife can beat me up :cigar:
He said femininity is a possession of women. I think you are reaching here.
Sometimes it's hard to be a woman
Giving all your love to just one man
You'll have bad times, he'll have good times
Doin' things that you don't understand
But if you love him, you'll forgive him
Even though he's hard to understand
And if you love him, oh be proud of him
'Cause after all he's just a man.