Ah, I'm disgusting for talking about pap smears and childbirth.....and that turns into Elo's descriptive misquote, "the resulting on the toughness of your parts from that and child birth."
It's obvious from your quote that is what you were implying, that because of your female part has been exercised in those ways it would be a breeze to be raped for you, and yes, that is an extremely disgusting sentiment, and on a number of levels.
But you two can speak about "arousal" ...
Me saying arousal is not lust is a fairly benign statement.
and "consensual kink" ...
Are you claiming that the marriage bed is not honorable in all? If not, that's a vague term to avoid being sexually explicit about what is moral between married couples but isn't considered procreative intercourse.
and "sperm count" and "hormonally visually stimulating" and "ovulating women" and "stimulating" and "pleasure centers for sickos" and anything else that pops into your sex-hyped brains and that's just fine. Over and over and on and on without respite.......
If it's fine for you to bring up strippers deserving rape and your own personal sexual experiences, and mention sex as much as you do in these discussions (we could provide more examples), and that allegedly means we are sex-hyped but not you?
My wife was a virgin when I married her so you aren't going to find her bragging like you, and she doesn't discuss her sex life. Her points about sex were general, in context and relatively benign.
Then Little Miss Innocent 1PM dares to ask if what I posted is "allowed on TOL"? What a HYPOCRITE :loser:
She was making points relevant to the subject being discussed. We are on a thread about glamour models and their alleged effect on men's sex drive.
On the thread we quoted you, it was about how nobody deserves to be raped. There you brought up the idea that strippers deserve to get raped and that being raped would be a breeze for you because of ... well, people can read for themselves now.