patman
Active member
Where did you answer that question? Cause you are saying God really didn't say that, then what did He say? Who said what Knight brought up?
E4E just wants to confuse everything so he can pretend he is right.
Where did you answer that question? Cause you are saying God really didn't say that, then what did He say? Who said what Knight brought up?
When have you ever addressed this argument?How many times have I got to prove you wrong on this post Knight? You got to be a gluten for punishment. God never said, "for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me." Looks like you would get tired of dredging up that tired argument.
Who is "the Angel of the Lord"...?
a. "This phrase is especially employed to denote the Lord himself in
that form in which he condescends to make himself manifest to man"
- Barnes (commentary on Gen 16:10)
b. "It seems to denote some person of the Godhead in angelic form."
- ibid.
-- Indeed, many believe that it was Jesus Christ, the Son of God in
pre-incarnate form, sometimes called "the Angel of the Theophany"
[Could this be? What other explanations might there be? In answer to
such questions, let's take a closer look at some of the...]
I. APPEARANCES OF THE ANGEL OF THE LORD
A. TO HAGAR...
1. When she was in the wilderness - Gen 16:7-14
2. The Angel speaks as though he was the LORD - Gen 16:10-12
3. Note carefully Gen 16:13
a. It was "...the LORD who spoke to her"
b. She called His name "You-Are-the-God-Who-Sees"
c. She said "Have I also here seen Him who sees me?"
B. TO ABRAHAM...
1. When he was about to sacrifice Isaac - Gen 22:9-19
2. The Angel speaks in the first person as though he were God
a. "you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me."
- Gen 22:12b
b. "By Myself I have sworn, says the LORD...blessing I will
bless you..." - Gen 22:15-18
C. TO MOSES...
1. At Mount Sinai, in the burning bush - Exo 3:1-6
2. The Angel identifies himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and
Jacob - Exo 3:6
D. TO ISRAEL...
1. The Angel of God led the Israelites out of Egypt - Exo 14:19;
cf. Num 20:16
2. God's angel led Israel through the wilderness - Exo 23:20-23;
cf. 32:34; 33:2
a. Note that God says "My Name is in Him"
b. This angel was called "the angel of His presence" - Isa
63:9; cf. Exo 33:14-15
[There are other examples where "the Angel of the Lord" speaks as the
LORD in the first person (e.g., Num 22:32) or where the Angel and the
LORD are described interchangeably (e.g., Jud 6:11-14). So, just who was
"the Angel of the Lord"? Here are two...]
II. EXPLANATIONS FOR THE ANGEL OF THE LORD
A. AN ANGEL WITH A SPECIAL COMMISSION...
1. Acting as God's representative or ambassador
2. One problem some pose with this explanation: implied is the
ability of the Angel of the Lord to forgive sin, something only
God can do - cf. Exo 23:20-23
B. JESUS CHRIST, THE PRE-INCARNATE SON OF GOD...
1. A kind of temporary pre-incarnation of the second person of the
Godhead
2. If the Angel of the Lord were the pre-Incarnate God the Son
a. Then the term 'Angel' would be taken in its root sense of
'Messenger'
b. Making the pre-incarnate Word of God 'the Messenger of God'
3. Evidence offered for this explanation
a. The Messiah to come is described as "the Messenger of the
covenant" - Mal 3:1
1) So Jesus would be a "messenger" of the New Covenant
2) Could He then have been a "messenger" (angel) during the
Old Covenant?
b. Paul reveals that Israel in the wilderness:
1) Was nourished by "that spiritual Rock that followed them,
and that Rock was Christ" - 1 Co 10:1-4
2) Tempted Christ - 1 Co 10:9
3) Which some take to be a reference to the Angel of the
Lord, the Angel of His Presence - cf. Isa 63:9; Exo 33:
14-15
4. But if Jesus was "the Angel of the Lord" where so mentioned in
the Old Testament...
a. He was the One sent to destroy Jerusalem after David's
census - 2 Sam 24:15-17; 1 Chr 21:14-18,26-30
b. He was the One who slew 185,000 men of the army of Assyria
- 2 Kin 19:35; 2 Chr 32:20-22; Isa 37:36; cf. Isa 63:9
c. Then again, Jesus is the One who will exercise judgment on
those who know not God nor obey His gospel - cf. 2 Th 1:7-9
Great point, the story makes no sense unless understood as written.I mean think about it, here is the whole story.
The 'since' here is better rendered 'seeing' as in the ESV. In "now I know" the actual Hebrew rendering would be "now I make it known". Moreover, the 'fear' is actually a metonymy to 'obedience'. In other words, "for now I make it known that you are obedient to God, seeing you have not withheld your son". Hence, the point was to manifest to the world, including anyone that would hear or read this account of Abraham, that Abraham was a man who was obedient to God.Ok, so if God wasn't testing Abraham why did He say.... "for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me."?
...for now I know....
...since you...
Why did God have Abraham go through all of that? What was the point?
I apologize. I am devoting much time and attention to my questions and responses--there is no other conversation going on around me. My answer must not have been clear so let me try once more. God knew from eternity what Abraham would be and would do, including "fearing" (obeying) God. I believe that was your choice 'D'. Please note that I am going to answer similarly for all things related to what God knows, for I do not believe that God accretes knowledge.It's funny, you seem to respond to questions I dont ask. Maybe you are having another conversation with someone else and you are getting confused?
I didn't ask.... when did God know Abraham would be His instrument?
I did ask.... when did God know Abraham feared Him?
I even gave you a pool of possible answers so you would be sure to answer the correct question and yet you still missed it.
The 'since' here is better rendered 'seeing' as in the ESV. In "now I know" the actual Hebrew rendering would be "now I make it known". Moreover, the 'fear' is actually a metonymy to 'obedience'. In other words, "for now I make it known that you are obedient to God, seeing you have not withheld your son". Hence, the point was to manifest to the world, including anyone that would hear or read this account of Abraham, that Abraham was a man who was obedient to God.
I apologize. I am devoting much time and attention to my questions and responses--there is no other conversation going on around me. My answer must not have been clear so let me try once more. God knew from eternity what Abraham would be and would do, including "fearing" (obeying) God. I believe that was your choice 'D'. Please note that I am going to answer similarly for all things related to what God knows, for I do not believe that God accretes knowledge.
The Hebrew scholar I communicate with does not agree with that.The 'since' here is better rendered 'seeing' as in the ESV. In "now I know" the actual Hebrew rendering would be "now I make it known". Moreover, the 'fear' is actually a metonymy to 'obedience'. In other words, "for now I make it known that you are obedient to God, seeing you have not withheld your son". Hence, the point was to manifest to the world, including anyone that would hear or read this account of Abraham, that Abraham was a man who was obedient to God.
OK, fair enough. I disagree but you already knew that.I apologize. I am devoting much time and attention to my questions and responses--there is no other conversation going on around me. My answer must not have been clear so let me try once more. God knew from eternity what Abraham would be and would do, including "fearing" (obeying) God. I believe that was your choice 'D'. Please note that I am going to answer similarly for all things related to what God knows, for I do not believe that God accretes knowledge.
Why would God need other people to know Abraham fears God. I thought that is supposed to be between God and Abraham?
Who needed to know Abraham feared God? Shoot Abraham could have told you that even before the event.
No additional examples are necessary, Knight. Thanks.Yes.
Of course!
By all means.
Do you want me to give you MORE examples? (I already gave you a great one a couple of posts ago)
AMR says," 12 And He said, “Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I make it known that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”
Say What AMR? Why would God need other people to know Abraham fears God. I thought that is supposed to be between God and Abraham?
Who needed to know Abraham feared God? Shoot Abraham could have told you that even before the event.
drb,AMR says," 12 And He said, “Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I make it known that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”
Say What AMR? Why would God need other people to know Abraham fears God. I thought that is supposed to be between God and Abraham?
Who needed to know Abraham feared God? Shoot Abraham could have told you that even before the event.
The Hebrew scholar I communicate with does not agree with that.
OK, fair enough. I disagree but you already knew that.
AMR I wish you would participate in more topics, it would be fun to team up on the same side in a different debate on another topic. For instance, it would be fun to battle some atheists together! :up:
Any other questions or things you would like to ask of me?
drb,
I believe that I stated "Hence, the point was to manifest to the world, including anyone that would hear or read this account of Abraham, that Abraham was a man who was obedient to God."
.....
Here we find a man who was obedient to God, yet a man whose faith was remarkable. Note how in Gen. 22:5, Abraham stated that he and his son would return, despite having been told by God to sacrifice Isaac. Abraham possessed the faith that God would raise up Isaac if he indeed would sacrifice him. Yet, there was no event of such a resurrection by God even recorded in the Hebrew writings at this time. But Abraham believed it could happen. How many of us possesses such faith? God is not asking anyone to sacrifice their sons to Him, yet we all fall short, and are humbled by, the faith Abraham demonstrated when asked so much more.
By the same logic one could very well ask why we have any narratives in the scriptures. You are not making much sense here.AMR,
The point of the test was to see how much faith he had. But why do you change the person interested? Why did God need to prove to us what he already knew? Why couldn't he just command us to have faith in Abraham's faith the same way he asks us to have faith in his resurrection?
I have carefully explained the verse. In previous posts I have also explained in much detail my position on God's knowledge. Your mere assertions to the contrary are unpersuasive.There is no way re-write scripture to fit our theologies. If we find ourselves doing so, our theology must be rewritten, not the scripture. God tested Abraham, he found out the answer, and then he knew.
The verse doesn't say "now the world knows" or "Now heaven knows", but "now I know."
Also, it is fun to look for more in scripture than is at face value, but we must be careful.
No I use the Mark passage for this one, since it is a quote of the Psalm.You forgot the 11th time scripture says a name twice. Psalm 22.
AMR,
The point of the test was to see how much faith he had. But why do you change the person interested? Why did God need to prove to us what he already knew? Why couldn't he just command us to have faith in Abraham's faith the same way he asks us to have faith in his resurrection?
There is no way re-write scripture to fit our theologies. If we find ourselves doing so, our theology must be rewritten, not the scripture. God tested Abraham, he found out the answer, and then he knew.
The verse doesn't say "now the world knows" or "Now heaven knows", but "now I know."
Also, it is fun to look for more in scripture than is at face value, but we must be careful.
You forgot the 11th time scripture says a name twice. Psalm 22.
I can feel confident in this because of the numerous examples in God's word.Can you elaborate on why you feel confident that, given God's sometimes fallible anticipation,
He could indeed, but that doesn't change that the fact that things didn't turn out as expected so I am not sure I get the question.(how does a false anticipation help God deal with the future challenges of mankind's history)? For example, I assume that one reason you would be confident is that God can intervene in human affairs when needed to "set things right".
He used to participate on TOL all the time.I'd like to see that scholar.
By the same logic one could very well ask why we have any narratives in the scriptures. You are not making much sense here.
I have carefully explained the verse. In previous posts I have also explained in much detail my position on God's knowledge. Your mere assertions to the contrary are unpersuasive.
No I use the Mark passage for this one, since it is a quote of the Psalm.
Thanks for stopping by.
Moses is writing down what God is telling him to convey important truths to the Israelites. The lesson is "What does it take to please God?"
The answer is "that God must have pre-eminence in your life."
Abraham's story is recorded to convey that lesson.
now...............I know....that......thou.......fearest...........God
Henceforth....know....truly.....you...morally revere......Elohim