I will answer as long as you promise not to say I haven't answered.Originally posted by Jaltus
Knight,
Can you explain from the context of Luke 12 why it does not fit all times and all places?
What limits the text?
Your argument here is already problematic. you are assuming that it means denial by actions, not verbal denial. You cannot assume this without proving it from the text since this is in fact what the debate is about.NOTE... If a man lives his life in denial of Christ he will be denied by Christ. No argument here.
This is unfounded. How can you make such a claim? There is no defense for this reading at all as far as I can tell. Nowhere in the following section does Jesus limit this in such a way.NOTE... From here on Jesus begins to refer specifically to His followers.
That is quite true. However, it is beside the point. The beginning of verse 11 starts with hOTAN DE, which strangely enough is a very strong contrastive, meaning that what comes before it is only linked in subject matter, and this is making a clean break with it in terms of what it is teaching (it is also used in parables as a break between the parable and the meaning).NOTE... Jesus is referring to when His followers are brought before the leaders of the "synagogues and magistrates and authorities", which does not have a specific application to a wicked lunatic smashing through our door to murder our families.
Originally posted by Jaltus
The text specifically says "confesses" and "denies," both of which are VERBAL. I have already shown you from BDAG in another thread how denial is verbal unless it carries an object of action with it.
Your right, I should have put a "POINT 2" right before I began to deconstruct the verses. My bad. But I also think your being a tad "picky".Originally posted by Jaltus
Knight,
The first problem is that you say two major points, but make only the one obvious reference to a point. I am just pointing that out as a stylistic issue, think of it as me being overly picky.
No that isn't my point at all. For some reason Jaltus you have a hard time understanding the nature of the debate. I will assume that it is my fault for not explaining things well enough. The point is that Jesus is talking about if a man denies Christ, that man will be denied! NOT if a believer denies Christ. Jesus is talking in general terms and says..."whoever confesses Me before men, him the Son of Man also will confess before the angels of God." Followed by..."But he who denies Me before men will be denied before the angels of God."Your argument here is already problematic. you are assuming that it means denial by actions, not verbal denial. You cannot assume this without proving it from the text since this is in fact what the debate is about.
Again you are way off the course of the debate. I am not arguing anything about verbal or non-verbal, furthermore the beginning part of Luke 12 would make that argument irrelevant in that God knows our hearts and minds, it wouldn't need to be verbal.The text specifically says "confesses" and "denies," both of which are VERBAL. I have already shown you from BDAG in another thread how denial is verbal unless it carries an object of action with it.
EXACTLY!!!! Whoever denies Christ as Savior remains in his sin. I am not arguing that.I would also like to reiterate my point that this is unlimited in terms of person, that it says "whoever" meaning ANYBODY in ANY circumstance. There is no circumstancial limitation within these verses (1-9).
All in all I think you are lost and have missed the point of this debate.All in all, I think Knight does not have a real leg to stand on. He must predetermine who Jesus is talking to in order to make his point. He assumes that 4-9 refers to denial by action, but that is not what the verses say. Finally, he makes the false conclusion that 11 is written only to the disciples.
ASIDE
To be honest, the disciples in Luke means all followers of Christ, but that is a side issue.
ROTHFL!!!! IPMP....Originally posted by Yxboom
So if you are held up, tied to a chair with duct tape over your mouth and you are asked if you are a Christian you can write a denial and be absolved of guilt, sway the evil doers and save your family......just as long as you don't say it. That is what Luke 12 is all about anyway..........
All in all I think you are lost and have missed the point of this debate.
Originally posted by Knight
You continue...No that isn't my point at all. For some reason Jaltus you have a hard time understanding the nature of the debate. I will assume that it is my fault for not explaining things well enough. The point is that Jesus is talking about if a man denies Christ, that man will be denied! NOT if a believer denies Christ. Jesus is talking in general terms and says..."whoever confesses Me before men, him the Son of Man also will confess before the angels of God." Followed by..."But he who denies Me before men will be denied before the angels of God."
In essence Jesus is saying the same thing that is said in...
John 3:18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Again you are way off the course of the debate. I am not arguing anything about verbal or non-verbal,
Thanks Pilgrim, I understand your point but I think the best response is....Originally posted by Pilgrimagain
You have asserted this but you have not proven it. That's were I'm in the dark.
Yea, thats a good point... none of us REALLY know how we would respond if the situation REALLY presented itself (heaven forbid).My suspicion is, since I know you are a true man of faith (one I admire for his zeal), that confronted with such a situation (which honestly none of us ever will be in all likly hood) you might want to deny it but that denial would stick in your throat because you would not be able to deny, even in deception what is the truest part of you.
That was Luke.Originally posted by Pilgrimagain
Ok I agree with the verse you posted, but by that same logic you have to use only what the scripture says in Luke. It says nothing about confessing for faith, it simply says to everyone standing there what a denial will mean.
Originally posted by Knight
Thanks Pilgrim, I understand your point but I think the best response is....
To assume the verse means anything OTHER than what it actually says is artificially reading more into the verse than what is really in the verse.
In other words.....
“Also I say to you, whoever confesses Me before men, him the Son of Man also will confess before the angels of God. 9 “But he who denies Me before men will be denied before the angels of God.
Simply means what it says!!!
If a man denies Christ that man will be denied! The man in denial will remain in his sin and die an unbeliever.
I agree with that 100%!!
You continue...Yea, thats a good point... none of us REALLY know how we would respond if the situation REALLY presented itself (heaven forbid).
But hypothetically I think God would rather we thwart the evil lunatic than let him murder our kids, ourselves and then possibly our neighbors.
Originally posted by Pilgrimagain
Peter denied Christ and was still saved.