Right Divider
Body part
I think that you are imagining things.Then that is a completely different scenario than our resident rape apologist described.
Last edited:
I think that you are imagining things.Then that is a completely different scenario than our resident rape apologist described.
I recommend reading the first page of the linked thread if you haven't, with Quip's and Town's back-and-forth.Abortion///cont.
Nothing in that connects to a refutation of my argument. Those are the dots and that's the nature of my answer. Quite to the contrary: On closer examination your position demands it. A newly combined egg and sperm are being lobbied as falling under the umbrella of "right-to-life". By...theologyonline.com
@Town Heretic argues against abortion rights based there being a preponderance of evidence that we cannot objectively know when on the timeline, between conception on one side and birth on the other, that the baby's right to life comes into being. Since we objectively cannot be sure, combined with it being such a grave evil if we are wrong about it, we are therefore only morally permitted to forbid and outlaw unjustified abortion.
That is completely and utterly wrong. We know, for a fact, that life begins at conception. That is irrefutable Biblical and scientific knowledge.I recommend reading the first page of the linked thread if you haven't, with Quip's and Town's back-and-forth.
Town's reasoning is simply solid. He doesn't even argue from the position that life begins at conception, he merely ties together the fact that our constitution is based upon human rights and that rights attach at some point between conception and birth inclusive, and that since it's currently unknowable when that point is, that it's simply responsible to forbid elective abortion.
Amazing to review that thread. Not a single mention of The DonaldHope your ban is up soon.
Came across this thread the other day. There are few threads left from my first couple years here when I was still a Republican. It's from the year before I left the GOP.
I miss so many posters who aren't here anymore.
toldailytopic: If you voted for Obama, do you regret it?
How do you reconcile voting for McCain given both his stand on abortion and your apparent view that the president impacts the issue? I followed somewhat the conversation between several posters here about whether someone voted for a baby killer or not. I have a problem with that particular...theologyonline.com
It is what it is. I'm an unapologetic Catholic apologist whose Catholic apologetics is unapologetically Catholic. And TOL is Dispensationalist.Hope your ban is up soon.
President Trump did, what you and Chrysostom were talking about, with the link with judges and abortion. For whatever he is, he did more to defend the fetus, than any other politician in America since Roe.Came across this thread the other day. There are few threads left from my first couple years here when I was still a Republican. It's from the year before I left the GOP.
I miss so many posters who aren't here anymore.
toldailytopic: If you voted for Obama, do you regret it?
How do you reconcile voting for McCain given both his stand on abortion and your apparent view that the president impacts the issue? I followed somewhat the conversation between several posters here about whether someone voted for a baby killer or not. I have a problem with that particular...theologyonline.com
An old thread which prompts a slightly different but related question:
Is believing/faith a work ?
The answer is absolutely yes. If we agree with the overall definition of work according to the greek word for work ergon: See strongs # 2041: business, employment, that which any one is occupied that which one undertakes to do, enterprise, undertaking any product whatever, any thing...theologyonline.com
Is reading the Bible a work?
If you can't find an old thread, try Google.
So, why are you dredging this thread up?can anyone please give me proof that Jesus Christ is real?
I have been dealing with this mythology teacher , and interviewing him on my tv and radio programs, and he gave incredible answers and question I don`t know to deal with them and if I let them be broadcast to the unbelievers and my audience it might prove to people there never was a real Christ...theologyonline.com
As if there is more than one....What definition of rape are we using?
Do you know what "everlasting" means?Israel under the Old Covenant was a special case.
A husband can rape his own wife, yes. It would be criminal and gravely sinful, and if he were my daughter's husband I'd have him arrested and help her divorce him.
Nope
What definition of rape are we using?
I know, right?As if there is more than one....
Yes.Do you know what "everlasting" means?
OK. But see link above.Genesis 17:13 He who is born in your house and he who is bought with your money must be circumcised, and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
Ezekiel 37 26 Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them, and it shall be an everlasting covenant with them; I will establish them and multiply them, and I will set My sanctuary in their midst forevermore.
The first is already here, the next is not here yet. Israel broke it, God did not. It is everlasting. No, it will not get them into the Body.
Just some interesting ideas in the OP; some common challenges /doubts offered by seekers and nonbelievers and Christians. I thought this one was particularly interesting (being Catholic I notice such things):So, why are you dredging this thread up?
lol yes indeed, that's one.The proof is that it is 2023 AD.