Thanks. But I am looking at the whole context, beginning with:
Matthew 24:1-2.
And even just before this where Jesus weeps over Jerusalem and laments its destruction. So everything Jesus says is in answer to this question: when will Jerusalem be destroyed and what signs will accompany it?
As you rightly say, the meaning of 'you' is clarified by the context. This is the context. 'You' is the disciples he is speaking to and the other disciples who would believe in him who were in danger of being caught up in the violence that was to come.
You must consider the surrounding text in which the verse appears to understand who "this generation" is. Consider the immediate context of the verse:
“Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. 33 Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it[e] is near, right at the door. 34 Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away. Matthew 24:32-35
You assume that "this generation" refers to whom he is immediately speaking. However, as we see above, he says this within the context of the parable of the fig tree. He says that "when you see these things" - that is when you see these signs and events which he above describes as the beginning of birth pains - that then you will "know that it is near, right at the door." And it is "THIS generation who will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened," that is to say, the generation who sees these signs.
Furthermore, the rest of the chapter goes onto describe the fact that no one knows the day nor the hour when these things will occur - not even the angels in heaven or the Son, but only the Father - only God Almighty himself. It would be quite foolhardy to say that no one knows this, not even the son - yet then try to say that the Son gave a deadline of the immediate generation.
There are false prophets who have tried to rebut that while we might not be able to pinpoint the day or the hour that we can know the week, month, year, etc. when these things will occur - but I don't think anyone can honestly read that passage and come to the conclusion that it was intended to merely restrict the precision of calculating when these things will occur. Rather the spirit of the verse is that it is beyond us to know when these things will occur until they start occurring - and even then, only if you have been persevering and keeping watch.
“Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. 43 But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into. 44 So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. Matthew 24:42-44
I wouldn't have bothered to ask. The mere fact that he said it shows that he delights in attention-seeking and I try not to oblige. I am not interested in mysteries but in openness.
Unfortunately, this explanation suffers from a serious error of logic. Because in order to make a meaningful statement you must distinguish certain things from certain other things. But if Jesus meant the whole of mankind from Adam then his statement is just a truism that this generation will end when it ends.
Unfortunately, this explanation suffers from a similar deficit as that of Michael Cadry above. Clearly Jesus says 'When you see these things'. So I don't see how you can say in the same breath that he is referring to some future generation when the events are going to happen and then overlook that he is speaking to the present generation. The cataclysmic events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 ad are easily enough to explain the language Jesus uses. And although this would support a preterist viewpoint, it doesn't prove a preterist viewpoint as there are other ways of looking at it. But the idea that Jesus was prophesying the fall of Jerusalem in 70 ad. is natural and well attested.
Jesus said many things which are not recorded in the Gospels and I am not saying that the preterist viewpoint is correct. Perhaps both the long and the short period return of Jesus were taught. And it is an obvious driver in Christian thought and ethics that there will be a final judgement. Jesus' warnings to flee Jerusalem were acted on by the early Christians and it seems obvious to me that Jesus' warnings must have, for that reason, been specific enough to be of value to them. But as the years go on and ten thousand interpretations have been given of how his words would apply to each present generation throughout history, the predictions of Jesus seem less and less meaningful and I think it would be entirely reasonable to conclude that they were not meant for us at all.
If you find this convincing- good for you. To me it looks like, for lack of a more polite term, nonsense. .
I wouldn't have bothered to ask. The mere fact that he said it shows that he delights in attention-seeking and I try not to oblige. I am not interested in mysteries but in openness.
Dear desert reign,
Do you live in the desert? I do. Hey, I just wanted to mention also that when Jesus said, 'every eye shall see Him, and they also who pierced Him {Rev. 1:7KJV}. "And the graves were opened, and many... and went into the city, and appeared to many." {Matt. 27:52KJV}. So was it then, so will it be at His 2nd Coming!! Thanks for Your post, Bro!!
Michael
P.S. I ignored your grievous words towards me. That is how I am. Love also your 'enemies.'
Gee, you'd think the Word of God would be more clear.
In Mathew 23, Jesus is prophesying the end times. It is clear that he is saying that the generation that enters the end times will not pass away untill it is finished. What he's saying is the end times wont last longer than a generation.
If you find this convincing- good for you. To me it looks like, for lack of a more polite term, nonsense. .
I clearly stated that the examples of such typology abound. This typology runs throughout Torah and Prophets and that was only the proverbial tip of the iceberg. What do you want me to do? post a book of Scripture passages for you in someone else's thread? You have Moshe and the Prophets.
Paul speaks of many mysteries and you would likewise do well to seek the truth of those matters rather than judging others as you have done all over this thread already in such a short amount of space. I posted many Scripture passages which all have to do with the OP and the "generations" of man; and you only show your own inner bitterness and gall when you judge that I only do so for my own glory. As another poster already said, Yeshua quoted much from Scripture, (and the apostolic new covenant writings did not yet exist at that time) and we all would likewise do well to understand when, where, and why he quoted what he did, which can only be done by checking the contexts of the those places from where he quoted. You claim to read Greek but what good does it do for you if you cannot even abide by what comes through in plain English? Matthew 7:1 immediately comes to mind and what follows applies directly to you for judging others without cause or good reason as you have done here in this thread: "Therefore all things whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you even so to them: for this is the Torah and the Prophets", (Matthew 7:12). You put yourself right back under the Torah and Prophets when you judge the motives of others, (especially unfairly) as you have done even right here. Do you not hear Paul when he says that you formerly served the Prince of the power of the air and unclean spirit of the world? Where did that one go when he went out of you? or did he truly ever even go forth from you? and does Yeshua not say that the unclean spirit returns to his house from whence he came, with seven other spirit more wicked than himself, as was quoted from Matthew 12:43-45 on the previous page? Do you not believe the Testimony of Yeshua or Paul? Do you not believe what Yeshua says about the the seven headed queen of Sheva the south rising up against you in your hour of judgment and great tribulation? You only curse yourself when you attempt to curse others as you have done here. It does you no good to read Greek or Hebrew if you do not believe what you read and apply it to yourself. You are fooling yourself having placed yourself under the judgment of both Torah and Prophets by the Testimony of Yeshua. In the afterglow days you will consider it perfectly, (if indeed you overcome in your appointed time). :crackup:
Paul and the disciples {and Stephen}, and other apostles, thought they were going to die for a good part of their lives, and that the rapture was in their lifetime on earth. There is a generation of man, beginning with Adam, and there is generation of this world that, so far, it is encroaching upon us and you all don't even know that. I don't want to tell you too much because it is hidden from you. Others may know, but you cannot, because you are not ready mentally or spiritually.
God Be With Your Heart, Mind and Spirit,
Michael
Look at his name Micheal; the king of Arabia is Aretas `Aza'zel.
Know to whom it is you speak . . . :crackup:
In his book "The Atheist’s Introduction to the New Testament: How the Bible Undermines the Basic Teachings of Christianity", Mike Davis says that, for him, the deciding factor about Christianity came down to Matthew 24:34.
I, of course, like the KJV so here it is:
Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
Proverbs 30:11-15 KJV
11. There is a generation [1] that curseth their father, and doth not bless their mother.
12. There is a generation [2] that are pure in their own eyes, and yet is not washed from their filthiness.
14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
We know the gospel wasn't preached throughout the whole world by 70 AD.
Yes, those who have not been regenerated would think that for sure.
Looks more like it's the believers who can't agree what Jesus was talking about.
Right again!!
You left out an important part of the verse.
It says, in your version, "as a testimony to all nations".
KJV says; "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come."
Acts 2 shows us this came to pass well before Jerusalem was destroyed. God deposited the gospel as a "testimony" (witness) throughout the entire inhabited world through His "chosen people" no less.
And you'd think God would ensure his word would be more clear and understandable.
I wouldn't have bothered to ask. The mere fact that he said it shows that he delights in attention-seeking and I try not to oblige. I am not interested in mysteries but in openness.
Unfortunately, this explanation suffers from a similar deficit as that of Michael Cadry above. Clearly Jesus says 'When you see these things'. So I don't see how you can say in the same breath that he is referring to some future generation when the events are going to happen and then overlook that he is speaking to the present generation. The cataclysmic events surrounding the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 ad are easily enough to explain the language Jesus uses. And although this would support a preterist viewpoint, it doesn't prove a preterist viewpoint as there are other ways of looking at it. But the idea that Jesus was prophesying the fall of Jerusalem in 70 ad. is natural and well attested.
Jesus said many things which are not recorded in the Gospels and I am not saying that the preterist viewpoint is correct. Perhaps both the long and the short period return of Jesus were taught. And it is an obvious driver in Christian thought and ethics that there will be a final judgement. Jesus' warnings to flee Jerusalem were acted on by the early Christians and it seems obvious to me that Jesus' warnings must have, for that reason, been specific enough to be of value to them. But as the years go on and ten thousand interpretations have been given of how his words would apply to each present generation throughout history, the predictions of Jesus seem less and less meaningful and I think it would be entirely reasonable to conclude that they were not meant for us at all.
Unfortunately, this explanation suffers from a serious error of logic. Because in order to make a meaningful statement you must distinguish certain things from certain other things. But if Jesus meant the whole of mankind from Adam then his statement is just a truism that this generation will end when it ends.
Yes, chair, that is TOTAL nonsense. Just wanted to let you know that I feel the same way, dude!
Remain Content And Joyful At The Coming Of The Lord Jesus,
Michael
Dear daqq,
You can't even spell my name right. It is MichAEl. It's okay though.
I agree with Chair and Michael.
Non is spewing nonsense.