Advice for Kim in Kentucky
- Thread starter Interplanner
- Start date
It may be hard for advise anyone to give up their career. Even though, in doing so, does demonstrate disapproval. If true, only a small percentage are behind this, then the rest is not responding according to the numerical advantage. We may let the state do what we dislike, though the state cannot make us approve what the few desire. The act itself, exposes them, and once exposed, there may be a fallout effect from the act disapproved, where this small wayward group could be driven to the periphery, without violence, and without vocal disapproval, only with a 98 percent to persist, thus causing these to move out of sight.
PureX
Well-known member
They aren't passing any laws. They are simply interpreting the laws that have been passed and determining their constitutionality. But whenever you don't like their decisions, you cry and whine that they're "passing laws".
Grow up.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Just another reason we should go back to the beginning when women and those who didn't own property had no vote.
She's in jail for obstructing a lawful order. She's an officer of the court and her options were to comply or resign. She chose to overstep her authority and is suffering the consequence she knowingly invited.
PureX
Well-known member
When you find yourself living in a country that disagrees with you about fundamental rights and freedoms, you ARE the "odd man out". Accept it for what it is and either leave, or learn to live with it.
I don't understand this insane presumption that the entire nation is supposed to find a way to accommodate your beliefs, when the vast majority of people in the country don't believe what you believe. That's not rational. And it's not going to happen.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I'm so glad you'll never see that day.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
she is in jail because she would not approve of two guys living together
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
While that bit of cleverness might fit more neatly into your Joan of Arc narrative, it's not the truth.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
The only way the judicial branch has any say, is on how an individual is prosecuted in court in violation of a law.
PERIOD.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Simon?
lain:I assume you're joking or do you think they just pop women into jails in Kentucky on whims?
Dialogos
Well-known member
What world do you live in?
:idunno:
Sex is almost a universal human behavior but I can point to the B in LGBT, the growing prominence of polysexuality and the longstanding prevalence of bigamy in many societies currently and throughout history to prove that you are simply, and demonstrably wrong.
Hisservant has pointed this out to you and your responses have been less than convincing.
And that's not the only thing you are clearly wrong about in this thread.
In the end, jailing someone because of their religious belief is a good thing how again?PureX said:
She's an elected official. And she offered to allow the licenses to be issued insofar as her name did not appear on them. Judge Bunning (who is behaving like a fascist judicial tyrant) did not see this as a suitable compromise and unlawfully imprisoned her.PureX said:
Her responsibility was to uphold KY law which actually contradicts the Supreme Court ruling. She is not being imprisoned for failure to follow her oath (which congressmen, our president, and federal court judges do all the time without being carted away in handcuffs), she is being unlawfully imprisoned for following the law as it read when she took the oath.PureX said:
Secondly, her community has nothing to do with this. The Supreme Court took it upon itself to disregard the separation of powers inherent in the Constitution and wrote a law for all 50 states legalizing same sex marriage. Her community didn't decide this, 9 (actually 5 of the 9) Justices did.
Which speaks to your statement below:
What are you talking about!???PureX said:
Democracy is not 9 people ruling a country, that's an oligarchy. Democracy would be allowing each state to decide the issue on the basis of the will of the people.
Kim Davis defied the oligarchs, and so she has become a political prisoner because she refuses to bend her will to the will of the Supreme Court oligarchy and its judicial Prefect, Judge Bunning (who is acting like a fascist judicial tyrant), who would not allow her to remove her name from the licenses. Until she consents to allow those licenses to be issued with her name on them the judge will keep her a political prisoner.
Judge Bunning should be impeached and publicly removed for his shameful disregard for constitutionally guaranteed rights. His actions are deplorable, he has torn the fabric of freedom of our country.
why is this a secret?
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
to their eternal shame
Let me guess - Rachel Madcow told you so? :chuckle:
inform yourself:
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090406021728AAc6Xzv
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
I agree with yer signature.
a.k.a. starchild, starburst, stardust, sweetpea, and dumber than dirt.
:cheers:
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
so it looks like this could have been handled in way that would have accommodated her religious beliefs and allowed the perverts to have their way
I wonder why that wasn't good enough.
Perhaps fool can come along and tell us how not having Davis' name on the certificate would have "picked their pocket" or "broke their leg"
Interplanner
Well-known member
For the same reason, Obama should be in prison, Hillary, the mayor of SF and the 2 judges who approved of SS marriage in CA against the vote of the people. We shouldn't be ruled by 1.5% but there is something so "right" about homosexuality that they manage to overthrow everything about the American system, whereas if it was a historic belief, it would be considered "imposing" to retain it.