Abortion ISN'T "murder"
- Thread starter User Name
- Start date
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
quip is on TOL for one purpose, alone: to beg for attention. He is a dyed-in-the-wool enemy of truth and logical thinking, and you will never get a rational response from him.
You've, indeed, succinctly shot down the stupidity frothed up by quip.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Quip is the closest I've come to getting a coherent discussion about autonomy from a leftist/liberal/feminist/pro-abort, and he always falls pitifully short. Full autonomy leads to consequences that they always balk at, and when they're shown that what they really believe in is limited autonomy and that the limits they set are arbitrary, their heads explode.
There is no "full autonomy" in relation to abortion...SCOTUS themselves added restrictions regarding late term abortions. This is nothing but a straw-man creation from the likes of your warped imagination.
Once again....try again.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
the concept of full autonomy covers anything that a person might choose to do with themselves
its libertarianism taken to its logical conclusion
not interested in current law :yawn:
Not interested in libertarianism. :yawn:
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
No. He isn’t committed to saving lives.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Why?
Here's the first thing that is given when I type "define murder" on Google:
| the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. |
Did you, by your use of the term, 'murder', have something radically different than that in mind?
For whatever motivation, you have chosen to not say for what purpose you "will never use the term murder (a legal term)", but, I take it you don't literally mean that you will never use it for any purpose, whatsoever. Perhaps, then, you meant specifically that you "will never use the term murder" to refer to abortion--that you will never call abortion murder.
If what you are trying to say is that you will never call abortion murder--that is, under no circumstances, whatsoever, will you ever call abortion murder, then, I ask: Why? Why will you, under no circumstances, whatsoever, call abortion (what you rightly admit is "intentional killing") murder?
Or, if you do not really mean "never", then under what circumstances would you call abortion murder?
Last edited:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
None whatsoever, but then he was hardly going to overturn current laws anyway. To be fair, neither the Republicans or Democrats are likely to.
eider
Well-known member
I don't think so........ a President who is determined over an issue would surely make mention of it, and push for change.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
For those of you who aren't retarded and British and infected with TDS consider the following:
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...rts-to-cement-his-conservative-legacy-2019-12
https://www.businessinsider.com/tru...rts-to-cement-his-conservative-legacy-2019-12
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Which Trump isn't because he doesn't care about it. Anyone who expected him to change laws on the issue was naive at best.
eider
Well-known member
Yes. I wonder about what President Trump does care about.
And if he is re-elected then the World will find out.
Presidential Powers and Privileges for four whole years without so much need to please any of the people, and no need for votes any more.
........ then we'll find out.
As a Brit and soon to be devolved Englishman living in a quite small overpopulated country outside of the European club I recognise our need to be close friends with big countries like the US. That will be our leader's day by day trauma, but will the morning news ever be interesting!
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Himself and...himself.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
It would be interesting to hear why Rusha will not call the murder that is abortion, "murder". If I'm not mistaken, I've asked her why not, but I've not received an answer from her. Perhaps she has me on "ignore". I was going to recommend you to ask her why she will not call abortion "murder", on the notion that, perhaps, though she won't answer it when I ask it, maybe she'd answer it if you ask it. But then I thought that, were you to do so, you might hazard yourself being called "troll" and put on "ignore".
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Did you have the same concerns in 2012 with the Kenyan?
In 2004 with Shrub?
In 1996 with Slick Willy?
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Perhaps she does. Perhaps she had enough of your verbal abuse. I'm not going to help you out here, Rusha is a very good friend of mine and I wouldn't presume to speak for her on the subject, especially to someone she's most likely placed on ignore.